Posted by Wild Card on Sat Feb 14th at 8:26pm 2004
Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Posted by OtZman on Sat Feb 14th at 8:27pm 2004
OtZman
member
1890 posts
199 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 12th 2003
Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student
Posted by Wild Card on Sat Feb 14th at 8:29pm 2004
well if your maps are rated low, it gives you less snarkmarks, if they are rated high, it gives more. If they are rated low often, it gives less (but in more quantity). If they are rated high often, it give more (in more quantity).
So someone with a single high rating might get less snarkmarks than a guy with many low ratings...
I think.
[addsig]Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Posted by Leperous on Sat Feb 14th at 8:29pm 2004
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Wild Card on Sat Feb 14th at 8:30pm 2004
Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Posted by OtZman on Sat Feb 14th at 8:31pm 2004
OtZman
member
1890 posts
199 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 12th 2003
Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student
Posted by Wild Card on Sat Feb 14th at 8:32pm 2004
if you delete a map
or if you get rated lower?
[addsig]Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Posted by matt on Sat Feb 14th at 8:34pm 2004
| ? posted by OtZman |
| Is there any way the snarkmarks can reduce? |
Rating. Its all about what people think of what you've done, as Leperous said when he showed us the formula for SMs
[addsig]
matt
member
1100 posts
190 snarkmarks
Registered: Jun 26th 2002
Location: Edinburgh

Occupation: Student!
Posted by OtZman on Sat Feb 14th at 8:36pm 2004
300 SM ---> 295 SM
??? [addsig]
OtZman
member
1890 posts
199 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 12th 2003
Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student
Posted by Wild Card on Sat Feb 14th at 8:37pm 2004
Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Feb 16th at 1:50am 2004
| ? posted by Wild Card |
| Oh that was probably Orph, he rated everyone a 3 at one time.. |
before the last system change that prevented it, i did indeed rate everyone i could a "3" (assuming you were new to the site, or didn't rate higher or lower for some past incidences)
, back then you didn't have to have maps in the profile to be elegable... IMO it was slightly better than now, but only cause of my definition as to the rating system in the first place..either way, post a map, a test map will suffice, and you can be rated.
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Gorbachev on Mon Feb 16th at 2:20am 2004
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Feb 16th at 11:10am 2004
| ? posted by Gorbachev |
| My profile is a very rarely visited area. My average seems to be one every odd day or so. Same with a small handful of ratings in comparison to how long I've been here |
you have been a "4" on mine for as long as i can remember ![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Pegs on Mon Feb 16th at 7:03pm 2004
Posted by Wild Card on Mon Feb 16th at 7:44pm 2004
Wild Card
member
2321 posts
339 snarkmarks
Registered: May 20th 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada

Occupation: IT Consultant
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0189 seconds.

