The upload progress map upload page is back, albeit in Beta form. The original add map page is still there if you have problems, but there is also a link to the beta page.
You will need Flash player 9, although 10 is recommended.
I have heavily overhauled the way the backend code works to make it compatible with non-Firefox browsers, and hopefully everything should be working ok now.
Should be useful for people uploading large files.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Thu Jun 4th at 4:13pm 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Thu Jun 4th at 4:13pm 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Riven on Sat Jun 6th at 6:09am 2009
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Posted by Riven on Sat Jun 6th at 6:09am 2009
Suh-weet! Although, I think if you want to get some real tests out of it, I would turn the beta upload page into the default page (the page to appear when clicking the 'add map' button) and add a link at the bottom saying something like
"If your map did not upload, or the profile did not go through, please click here to load up the standard version of this page and try again. Sorry for the inconvenience, we are currently testing a new upload bar for large files. Thank you!"
-And every time a user clicked that link, you could have it send you a personal e-mail notifying you, or offer the user to send you a pm describing the issue.
/2 cents
"If your map did not upload, or the profile did not go through, please click here to load up the standard version of this page and try again. Sorry for the inconvenience, we are currently testing a new upload bar for large files. Thank you!"
-And every time a user clicked that link, you could have it send you a personal e-mail notifying you, or offer the user to send you a pm describing the issue.
/2 cents
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Sat Jun 6th at 6:34am 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Sat Jun 6th at 6:34am 2009
I still need to do a bit more code for the backend as there is a certain way it can break right now... well, not break but behave oddly if someone does certain things. It's v unlikely tho. It should degrade to a normal form if you don't have flash too, but haven't tested that yet either.
I'll just keep working and get round to testing it in other browsers... then recode the edit page too before making it the default.
I'll just keep working and get round to testing it in other browsers... then recode the edit page too before making it the default.
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Mon Jun 8th at 8:36am 2009
Modified upload processing so that an animated gif will work provided its dimensions are with the specified constraints and it does not exceed 256KB.
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Mon Jun 8th at 8:36am 2009
Quoting RedWood
Is there a way to get a gif to work as an avatar? It uploaded but it doesn't play.
Modified upload processing so that an animated gif will work provided its dimensions are with the specified constraints and it does not exceed 256KB.
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by RedWood on Tue Jun 9th at 5:42pm 2009
Modified upload processing so that an animated gif will work provided its dimensions are with the specified constraints and it does not exceed 256KB.
Thanks Larch
My gif won't work though
Posted by RedWood on Tue Jun 9th at 5:42pm 2009
Quoting larchy
Quoting RedWood
Is there a way to get a gif to work as an avatar? It uploaded but it doesn't play.
Modified upload processing so that an animated gif will work provided its dimensions are with the specified constraints and it does not exceed 256KB.
Thanks Larch
My gif won't work though
Reality has become a commodity.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Riven on Tue Jun 9th at 6:40pm 2009
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Posted by Riven on Tue Jun 9th at 6:40pm 2009
Have you re-uploaded it? or re-named it first and then uploaded it (in case the current code does not overwrite files with similar names)
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Tue Jun 9th at 8:00pm 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Tue Jun 9th at 8:00pm 2009
You need to resize it so it doesn't exceed 150px in either width or height, and also make sure it doesn't exceed 256KB in file size.
If it exceeds either of these it will go through processing which will nerf any animation.
Name doesn't matter... they all get named to avatarUserID.gif or whatever (eg avatar6381.gif/jpg/png for me).
Also fixed the issue with them being cached and not refreshing after upload.
If it exceeds either of these it will go through processing which will nerf any animation.
Name doesn't matter... they all get named to avatarUserID.gif or whatever (eg avatar6381.gif/jpg/png for me).
Also fixed the issue with them being cached and not refreshing after upload.
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by haymaker on Tue Jun 16th at 2:15am 2009
Posted by haymaker on Tue Jun 16th at 2:15am 2009
I have a question about updating maps...
I need to post new download links as all the Filefront targets got deleted unbeknownst to me, BUT I don't necessarily want to have them appear on the front page. There's no reason to bump somebody's hard-worked-on new release from public view just to do such a low-level update.
Possible?
I need to post new download links as all the Filefront targets got deleted unbeknownst to me, BUT I don't necessarily want to have them appear on the front page. There's no reason to bump somebody's hard-worked-on new release from public view just to do such a low-level update.
Possible?
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Tue Jun 16th at 7:26am 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Tue Jun 16th at 7:26am 2009
Well the 'latest maps' column doesn't go off when a map was updated, so you won't bump any maps off there.
The 'recent updates' box on the bottom left will still show any recent edits... just so ppl can see when something has been updated.
Sound ok?
Hall of Fame got waylaid, sorry. Might get around to doing it properly if I can!
The 'recent updates' box on the bottom left will still show any recent edits... just so ppl can see when something has been updated.
Sound ok?
Hall of Fame got waylaid, sorry. Might get around to doing it properly if I can!
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by FatStrings on Wed Jul 22nd at 8:11pm 2009
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by FatStrings on Wed Jul 22nd at 8:11pm 2009
why are there no "recently" threads!!!
they were all we ever talked about
they were all we ever talked about
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by reaper47 on Thu Aug 6th at 1:45am 2009
Posted by reaper47 on Thu Aug 6th at 1:45am 2009
Just had a chance to try out the new map upload function (with the live progress bars) and it worked marvelously. Never been that comfortable before.
Great job, larchy!
Great job, larchy!
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Riven on Thu Aug 6th at 4:24am 2009
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Posted by Riven on Thu Aug 6th at 4:24am 2009
I think we need a way to delete map images instead of either leaving them as is, or replacing them, Is there a way to delete a map's profile images one by one? -In case one were to stop working kinda like the second image for RedWood's new map: cs_offload It either needs to be replaced or deleted. Am I missing something?
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by RedWood on Fri Aug 7th at 6:17pm 2009
The last pic was a duplicate. so i changed it from 8 pics to 7 in hopes that it would delete the last one. It didn't work out so well.
Posted by RedWood on Fri Aug 7th at 6:17pm 2009
Quoting Riven
I think we need a way to delete map images instead of either leaving them as is, or replacing them, Is there a way to delete a map's profile images one by one? -In case one were to stop working kinda like the second image for RedWood's new map: cs_offload It either needs to be replaced or deleted. Am I missing something?
The last pic was a duplicate. so i changed it from 8 pics to 7 in hopes that it would delete the last one. It didn't work out so well.
Reality has become a commodity.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Niborius on Sun Aug 23rd at 5:21pm 2009
Posted by Niborius on Sun Aug 23rd at 5:21pm 2009
It would be nice if you were able to comment on someone's diary entry's. Do you think it's a good idea?
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Nibgames
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Le Chief on Mon Aug 24th at 6:50am 2009
Yeah, I kind of assumed we would be able to comment on peoples journal entries then was a little surprised when we couldn't.
Posted by Le Chief on Mon Aug 24th at 6:50am 2009
Quoting Niborius
It would be nice if you were able to comment on someone's diary entry's. Do you think it's a good idea?
Yeah, I kind of assumed we would be able to comment on peoples journal entries then was a little surprised when we couldn't.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by RedWood on Wed Aug 26th at 4:31am 2009
Posted by RedWood on Wed Aug 26th at 4:31am 2009
Larchy I just have to say the site works grate on my cell phone. Even browsing the maps section works grate. I barly see a diffrence between my phone and computer. The only part that doesn't show properly are the actual form post. Unless your zoomed all the way out the body of text is halfway off the page to the left and u can't scrool to it. Other then that grate job.
I have a g1 with a moded os and I think the browser was pulled from a latter version of android. Don't know if u care just incase u wanted to know.
I have a g1 with a moded os and I think the browser was pulled from a latter version of android. Don't know if u care just incase u wanted to know.
Reality has become a commodity.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Riven on Mon Aug 31st at 11:44pm 2009
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Posted by Riven on Mon Aug 31st at 11:44pm 2009
I think it's an unannounced agreed consensus:
Can we allow first posts (starting posts) to threads be editable all the time for the users who posted it?
Hopefully this won't be too big a deal to implement.
Can we allow first posts (starting posts) to threads be editable all the time for the users who posted it?
Hopefully this won't be too big a deal to implement.
Riven
super admin
1639 posts
802 snarkmarks
Registered: May 2nd 2005
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Occupation: Architect
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by larchy on Tue Sep 1st at 7:00am 2009
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Posted by larchy on Tue Sep 1st at 7:00am 2009
kk that should be working now
larchy
super admin
496 posts
87 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 14th 2008
Location: UK
Occupation: kitten fluffer
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Sep 28th at 1:49pm 2009
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Sep 28th at 1:49pm 2009
I don't think that I like the "whos online" being alphabetically listed. I am quite used to being listed among the 1st, not last.
We need to go back to registration date listing order.
We need to go back to registration date listing order.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA
Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Re: ARCHIVE: Snarkpit v6 Feedback Thread
Posted by Niborius on Wed Sep 30th at 3:39pm 2009
Thanks, I needed that also. Works perfectly.
Posted by Niborius on Wed Sep 30th at 3:39pm 2009
Quoting larchy
kk that should be working now
Thanks, I needed that also. Works perfectly.
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/Nibgames
© Snarkpit.net 2001 - 2023, about us, donate, contact
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0153 seconds.
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0153 seconds.