A HEALTHY political topic.
Post Reply
Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 8:58pm 2004


? posted by Smoke
Don't let anyone ever tell you that money doesn't grow on tree's.

you should really get one of our artists to edit the red out of that avatar.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Juim on Sat Mar 13th at 8:59pm 2004


Why would anybody care about what other people do,especially if it has no bearing whatsoever on your life?

Will gay relationships jack up your insurance?, or threaten your existence in any way at all? Or your childrens?

How?

I mean, to take a meaningless stance publicly and actually protest something as inneffectual to them as homosexuality. I swear, sometimes I think people just like to feel there jaws moving.

Its here, its real, and its never going away. How can it be an abhorration of nature when it occurs so frequently within nature? It's not a disease for cryin out loud. Get over it people. We are set acast in a world with some very real and dangerous problems. We should all focus more on simply being decent humans, as opposed to White, or black, or straight, or gay humans.

As for gays being selfish for wanting to have access to the constitution of marriage, how does that work? Because a person is gay they should not be entitled to the same blanket of federal assistance as any one else?. Why.? I feel that monogamy and devotion are higher functions of a conscious mind. These behaviours benefit a person regardless of the compositional elements. Don't quote the bible either. Its a 2000 year old reference on how to live and needs updating sorely. (remember, son of a minister speaking here, hehe).

I am suprised and dismayed when I hear people say things like "They should all be destroyed". Hitler felt that way about the jews did'nt he? How is it any different?. This, I feel is nothing more than mindless intolerance. Or perhaps fear. You want to make the world a better place, than start at home base. Step back a sec and take a long hard look at the battles you choose to fight. You may miss an opportunity to actually make the world a better place while you are staring at your neighbor with hatred and contempt.

Thats all for me. Hope I did'nt bore anyone.





Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 9:05pm 2004


? posted by Juim

Is it selfish to want equal treatment?.

the government in essence, already punishes people, just for being single, what makes gays special enuff to warrant better treatment than people whom want to remain single?

my brother makes like 20 bucks an hour, he got married last year because?? taxes were eating him alive.. he won't admit to this, but i see absolutely no love in his relationship with his spouse.

how does this have any barring on the question at hand, i haven't the slightest idea, but if gays really want the benefit of married life and tax breaks, let them find a gay of the opposite sex, and marry them, no one says they must sleep with them

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on Sat Mar 13th at 9:24pm 2004


So your brother should be allowed to marry a woman he in all likelyhood doesn't love, but a homosexual couple where both parties greatly love each other shouldn't be allowed to marry?

Not everyone has a hidden agenda. You talk about gay marriage as being just for the benefits, but what about those who genuinely love each other? And those who don't, how is that any different than a heterosexual couple getting married only for the benefits?

Marriage in its purest sense is a commitment to someone - a commitment that I myself am making this summer (though really, the ceremony is just a confirmation of that commitment I have already made).

Justifying views against homosexual marriage based solely on the grounds that some (read: not all) would abuse it for the benefits or better treatment or whatever else only holds up until you turn the microscope back on heterosexual marriages and realize they're already doing the exact same thing.

Hell, half the claims I see against gay marriage take studies aimed at the longevity of gay relationships vs. married couples. But get this. There's no equal ground for comparing married heterosexual couples with partnered homosexual couples. So they take a blanket sample of the entire population against only the married heterosexual couples, and then say that homosexual couples are less stable. So what the hell happens when you include a cross-section of the entire heterosexual community, married, engaged, or even dating with the results? How many of you have been in a relationship that lasted only a couple months?

Manipulation of the sample is a powerful thing, and the organizations behind them are always some "Marriage research foundation" or "defense of family" front group for a much larger fundamentalist group. Go figure.

Wow, that got a little on a tangent... Bottom line is, anything that the gay community is being accused of as 'damaging' to society or whatever else is already being done on at least as large a scale in the heterosexual community, and denying the homosexual community any right to marriage on these grounds alone (which many arguments are) only is viable when marriage itself is entirely abolished and banned. Let's see how well that propostion goes over. [addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 9:30pm 2004


the problem andrew is, the most vocal of the gays i have heard on the news and whatnot are indeed complaining about the taxes issue, i didn't just throw that in to make myself sound better.

i realize love comes in many forms, i also realize that hetero couples divorce at at alarming rate now days, i am no more an advocate of that either. i have been married since 1981, do you think i stay that way only cause i am to lazy to get divorced?

i did not relish the thought of my brothers impending wedding, but what could i do, he is in his 30's afterall, its his choice to screw it up, my obligation ended when i told him it was a mistake, end of discussion, that is if i want to continue with any sort of a relationship with him.

the point is, there are ways around taxes, that do not involve gay marriage, gays whom love each other, will continue to do so without a certificate of authentication

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by fishy on Sat Mar 13th at 9:37pm 2004


should there be legal recognition of same sex couples in areas of entitlement and liability?

yes

should two people get together in front of a god that calls them an abomination, and hope for his blessing because its ok now?

i think not.

is it ok for two bank robbers(one male one female) to get married?

yes

is it accepable to rob banks?

bank robbers think so.





Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 9:40pm 2004


fish, you never fail to make me smile..

you have my gratitude, even if that was not your goal.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by fishy on Sat Mar 13th at 9:48pm 2004


in the time it took me to write a few different attempts at a post, the thread has grown by a full page. i dont know what anyones talking about now.

cheers Orf,

btw, i'm sure it was these forums that someone posted a link to an article about people getting married to trees in india. some sort of custom to do with land rights, but marriage all the same.





Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Sim on Sat Mar 13th at 9:51pm 2004


wow, I haven't been reading this, but it's at 6 pages in 15 hours! It's like IRC here. [addsig]



Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 9:55pm 2004


? posted by fishy

btw, i'm sure it was these forums that someone posted a link to an article about people getting married to trees in india. some sort of custom to do with land rights, but marriage all the same.

that would be, yours truly

funny, i found that ceremony far less offensive, could have been the fact that it predates our version of marriage, i dunno, but i found the article fascinating none the less.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Skeletor on Sat Mar 13th at 11:44pm 2004


? posted by Orpheus
? posted by Juim

Is it selfish to want equal treatment?.

the government in essence, already punishes people, just for being single, what makes gays special enuff to warrant better treatment than people whom want to remain single?

So, because a man doesn't want to get married to a woman, or because a man can't find a woman to marry (vice versa), two gay people who WANT to get married shouldn't be able to?

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 11:49pm 2004


uhhh, skeletor, this whole thread has been asking this very question.. i am afraid i am not the best person to ask. [addsig]



Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Skeletor on Sat Mar 13th at 11:51pm 2004


? posted by Orpheus

the point is, there are ways around taxes, that do not involve gay marriage, gays whom love each other, will continue to do so without a certificate of authentication

Gays shouldn't have to "find a way" around taxes or be denied a certificate. It's all about equality, and I don't think that's selfish at all. [addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Mar 13th at 11:59pm 2004


? posted by Skeletor

? posted by Orpheus

the point is, there are ways around taxes, that do not involve gay marriage, gays whom love each other, will continue to do so without a certificate of authentication

Gays shouldn't have to "find a way" around taxes or be denied a certificate. It's all about equality, and I don't think that's selfish at all.

dude, you are on another page, the page where people think just like you do.. quoting me aint gonna help much. my point is a valid one, albeit not totally accepted in all circles. but valid none the less.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Cassius on Sat Mar 13th at 11:59pm 2004


*slaps Skeletor's hand for good measure

Anyway, Crono, Orph said he would divorce his wife if gays were given legal marriage because of protest.

Christianity, though it has kept the same text, has obviously changed. It says homosexuality is an abomination. It also says you should be stoned if you work on the Sabbath; so, as Bill Maher (though I hate to quote that rat bastard) says, "they're kind of picking and choosing what in the Bible they want to believe in."

I myself went through confirmation class, and the most important thing I was told was that if you believe in Christianity, you do not snip pages out of the Bible which you choose not to believe in - it's the same as in Bushido, "you cannot add to the way of the warrior and call it the way of the warrior." It is also said in the Bible that Christians should not differentiate in philosophy, but simply follow 'the wisdom of God', which is of course the Bible.

People are perfectly at right to be, and in various ways justified, in saying that homosexuality is an abomination. However, if they do so in accordance with their religious beliefs, then you cannot leave your other beliefs behind.





Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Sun Mar 14th at 12:17am 2004


My take is simply this: It is not the governments place to regulate American life. The only lawful way in which an individual's freedom of action may be curtailed is if that action infringes on another individual?s liberty. Murdering someone clearly infringes upon their rights and should therefore be illegal. Gary marriage affects no one but the consenting parties involved, and should therefore clearly be legal.

The tax issue is an entirely different bag. I don?t think it is right for married people to receive tax benefits the rest of us do not, however I?m sure this is simply a relic of a time when women were incapable of earning a living in society. In that circumstance it would make sense to give the tax break.>>

[addsig]



Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Skeletor on Sun Mar 14th at 12:20am 2004


Yea, I realize that I am a little behind, but you guys are going so fast I haven't had the chance to reply to many of the posts.

? posted by Orpheus
uhhh, skeletor, this whole thread has been asking this very question.. i am afraid i am not the best person to ask.

And about that: I was trying to grasp what you were saying. It was meant to be rhetorical.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Mar 14th at 12:28am 2004


? posted by Skeletor
? posted by Orpheus
uhhh, skeletor, this whole thread has been asking this very question.. i am afraid i am not the best person to ask.

And about that: I was trying to grasp what you were saying. It was meant to be rhetorical.

still, i seem to NOT be the best person to ask, but it is my belief, that the driving force behind all this is the tax issue, has been for a while now... many people are attempting to gloss it over with "rights" issues, but the fact remains its the almighty dollar.

where i work, i drive blah,blah miles each year, its all without any deductions, so my gross and net are the same.

i am forced to acquire other means of deductions, in this case, my car, which goes everywhere i do.. it alone is more than enuff to compensate.

other people work with me, and complain endlessly about their taxes, and i ask them why.. i have no problems at all.

i point out i have a tow vehicle, and they should too, they complain they do not want the hassles of a tow car, i whisper "who says you have to tow it"?

the point is, there are ways, legal ones, why attempt to circumvent the system, or worse cry foul and spout rights bulls**t...

two gays, find two opposite sex gays, marry each other, but live with the one they care for.. end of issue, end of story, taxes are fixed ala married style.

i would think gays had more brains, but maybe their orientation is not the only thing defective

[addsig]




Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Skeletor on Sun Mar 14th at 12:33am 2004


LOL!

Oh dear, I can't believe I didnt think of that!

The argument still stands, WHY SHOULD GAYS HAVE TO GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO GET WHAT EVERYONE ELSE GETS?

[addsig]



Quote
Re: A HEALTHY political topic.
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Mar 14th at 12:39am 2004


? posted by Skeletor

LOL!

Oh dear, I can't believe I didnt think of that!

The argument still stands, WHY SHOULD GAYS HAVE TO GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO GET WHAT EVERYONE ELSE GETS?

because?

you should not be different, but be treated the same?

hell i dunno, and honestly its gone past caring..

i do however suggest you read this whole topic, it contains some rather pointed opinions, and not all of them are as narrow as mine seem to be.

you are only cheating yourself if you dont read them, and you dishonor your fellow members as well... i may disagree with many people here, but would never even consider not reading their thoughts.

[addsig]





Post Reply