but SC, where exactly does one draw that line?

i mean seriously, the only thing i hate more than gays are cell phones, but people always tell me to mind my own business about those two, in spite of the fact that they do indeed infringe on my rights to drive on safe highways.

some people do not understand the distinction between the two, rights and imagined rights.

i agree that in theory, gays do no damage other than to themselves, but the fact is, some do hurt children, no more so than than supposed normal people do, (if you could consider anyone who hurts children to be normal).. anywhos... here i am preaching again.. will i never learn.

that SC was very well put, i agree 100% on all counts, but the fact remains, some feel otherwise, and would fight just as strongly about retaining their phones.

indeed, i do like how you posed your thoughts..

either your teacher is your age too, or lived in a hut during the 60's cause sex was far more open then than even now..

you might have your teachers credentials checked out, cause if he/she is remiss in this, then you might not be getting the best education you deserve.

for the record, i disagreed with the 60's outlook on sex too, for my own reasons of course.

Pot should be legalized, but for no other reason than if it is, it would take the money that orgainized crime now makes and uses to beat, murder and be just plain nasty, and make it taxable by the government to fund programs such as free medical care, schools, colleges, and University's. On top of that the poor mid west farmers will be able to actually make some money producing and growing a crop that is worth $2000/pound compared to corn $2/pound. Not to mention it would stop the rape of this worlds natural resources to make paper, cotton, etc, because pot grows 20 ft in four month's outside, is perfect to make paper, and textiles, on top of that it doesn't require chemicals to: bleach the paper pulp and cotton, or chemicals to make polyester, and other synthetic fibers, that strangely enough all come from the same company: Dupont, the company that back in the day, lobbied the government, and spent millions of dollars to make pot illegal. Why you ask, because if it was legal, Dupont would stand to lose billions, and be out of business along with the major cotton producers that became so powerful through the use of slave labour. Before the 1920's. It was illegal not to grow pot. You had to support the war effort, pot was used for everything, as well as a great way to relax.

so few people actually take the time to type an agreement to my words, that its truly shocking when i read it, and i might add, makes it all the more special..

i would like to say, that i have never advocated the thought police mentality, you cannot be held accountable for thinking stuff.

everyone has thought, "i'd like to kill so and so" some time or another, but should they be charged for attempted murder?

all males think about screwing someone (be is hetero, or homo sex) should they be charged with attempted rape?

thought police, are the worse kind of crimes against ones rights. but i fear, a few here at snarkpit suffer this malady.

thanx for the kind words cass

I acknowledged this in my second post. I'm not sure exactly where the line goes, but I doubt a society that approaches this hypothetical line will exist during my lifetime, so I'm not terribly concerned about it.