Karen O.
Post Reply
Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Apr 5th at 12:36am 2004


? posted by Vash
Offspring rocks you.

hmmm, the process of creating offspring rocks for sure.

/scuttles away

[addsig]




Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Skeletor on Mon Apr 5th at 12:51am 2004


? posted by ReNo
Nobody seems to mate, its just young kids that hear and like a song, and can only afford a single with their pocket money..

I think singles are outdated now, ESPECIALLY because of mp3's and p2p and crap like that. Why by a single for half the price of the album when you can download it for free? And you should have no trouble finding a single because they are usually popular. The only downside is if you wannt that extra stuff they put on there like remixes and bonuses.





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Mon Apr 5th at 9:38am 2004


It's not as easy as it used to be to download the new popular songs, because fakes are circulated around the p2p networks. Also, if it's a band that only has a tiny fanbase, you're not really going to get mp3s unless they give them away. It's not always as simple as it used to be. Of course, what's wrong with just getting the album? They don't cost much. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Crono on Mon Apr 5th at 5:23pm 2004


? quote:

Of course, what's wrong with just getting the album? They don't cost much.


...Dude, I don't know where you live, but that's not true everywhere.

Here, CDs cost more then DVDs in some instances and they're usually a dollar off, new that is. However, used the CDs are the same price as used DVDs ... I don't want to pay $18-25 dollars for a CD, when for the same amount of money I could get something closer to being worth it. [addsig]




Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Mon Apr 5th at 6:35pm 2004


Really, I would never buy a CD that goes over ?12, as that would just be a rip off (unless of course if it is a double-album, in which ?20 is the limit, or unless I really wanted it). http://www.play.com do CDs for ?8-9, with free delivery, which is a great deal compared to what I'm used to. And, they sometimes have the more obscure artists, so it isn't just limited to the chart toppers. I can very easily afford a couple of CDs a month (maybe one or two more if I feel like treating myself) where I live, which is more than enough for me. DVDs tend to cost around ?15-20 over here, so the idea of CDs costing the same as DVDs bewilders me somewhat. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by SuperCrazy on Mon Apr 5th at 7:34pm 2004


? posted by Yak_Fighter
Bah! Offspring is not pop-punk. We aren't talking about Good Charlotte, New Found Glory, All-American Rejects, Simple Plan, or any of that crap...

You can't just say they're not pop-punk. I would place them in that category along with the other bands you mentioned, but you would not. It's subjective.





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Mon Apr 5th at 7:49pm 2004


The Offspring (i.e. now, in 2004) are undeniably pop-punk. They're just good pop-punk. Not all pop-punk is crap. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Finger on Mon Apr 5th at 10:28pm 2004


"so the idea of CDs costing the same as DVDs bewilders me somewhat. "

Think of the amount of entertainment you get from a good CD, compared to a good movie. Maybe I am abnormal, but I just can't watch a movie more than a few times, no matter how great it is. Music on the otherhand, I can listen to for decades.





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Skeletor on Mon Apr 5th at 10:39pm 2004


Do they raelly cost that much in Oregon? That's hard to believe. Down here, they've lowered almost all CD's down to around $10. At Best Buy they have plent for $6 even. I think they bare trying to compete with p2p and maybe even iMusic, or at least generate the same popularity? I dont know.



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Apr 5th at 10:40pm 2004


? posted by Finger

Maybe I am abnormal, but I just can't watch a movie more than a few times, no matter how great it is. Music on the otherhand, I can listen to for decades.

i guess, i should not mention, that i watch "Men in Black" almost every week.. i call it men in black sunday around here

and i have seen "Dinosaur" and "Zeus and Roxanne" about 100 times, thanx to my grandson.. and i might add, i enjoy them each viewing

my music? 70's and 80's two decades that IMO will never be surpassed in quality.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Mon Apr 5th at 11:55pm 2004


I'll agree that arguing about what category a group fits in is rather pointless as it is all subjective. I go less by lyrics and more by sound when making those judgements, and under those circumstances I would put Offspring closer to Pennywise than New Found Glory, but to each their own. I'm not going to really defend a band that isn't in my top three favorites





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Apr 6th at 12:08am 2004


? posted by Yak_Fighter

I'm not going to really defend a band that isn't in my top three favorites

AbbA
Donna Summers
Chic?

/runs but cannot seem to out distance approaching projectiles.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Tue Apr 6th at 12:16am 2004


Oh Orph, you couldn't be farther from the truth.

1. Rammstein
2. Nine Inch Nails
3. Fear Factory





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by ReNo on Tue Apr 6th at 12:21am 2004


Offspring certainly WEREN'T pop-punk, however I'd say since perhaps Americana, they have certainly been sliding toward this genre. Its not fair to say they are a pop-punk band in essence as there sound hasn't changed that drastically since Ignition (ignoring the rather unimpressive first album), but the fact that they are a punk band, that from Americana onwards, have proven quite popular, could be reason to call them pop-punk. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Tue Apr 6th at 1:07am 2004


I do have to admit, genres seem rather pointless now. I remember NME dubbed a band "screamcore". What the hell is screamcore? Though then again, it does make it easier to tell people what type of music I'm into when they ask. But then they give me an odd look, so I give examples, and then they start to slowly back away from me. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Finger on Tue Apr 6th at 6:06pm 2004


My tastes could be categorized as:

Death-Folk-hip-hopped-grunge-parlor-ska-trance

Pretty much anything buy Yanni.





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Gwil on Tue Apr 6th at 6:13pm 2004


Its easier to put things into genres of
"I like it"
"I like some of their stuff"
"I like and bits and bobs" and
"I hate them and wish to burn their guitars and drive nails through the hearts"

Not a big fan of the YYY's myself, there was a good song on John Peel before they got all the hooha about them, havent the foggiest what it was called though

i shall now return to various obscure bands and hits from the 80s and continue my music snobbery [addsig]




Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Skeletor on Thu Apr 8th at 12:13am 2004


LOL, sounds good to me. [addsig]



Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by Cash Car Star on Thu Apr 8th at 12:21am 2004


? posted by ReNo
Nobody seems to mate, its just young kids that hear and like a song, and can only afford a single with their pocket money..

Have you seen the cost of a single? Ever? They were always like $4 a cassette, $7 a CD-single. That's about half the price of a full album. Until a year ago, when legal music downloads became available, it was horribly pricy to buy a single. Now, the going rate online seems to be 99 cents, which is a reasonable price for just one song.

The only people who bought singles were die-hard collectors that needed that obscure b-side for completeness.

Edit: Hmm, seems nearly all of this was said right after ReNo said his thing. Frankly, reading through the thread, this grabbed me so much I felt obliged to respond before reading further.

So, um, The Offspring. As the proud owner of Ignition and Smash, and the shamed owner of Americana, I gotta say they really did hit a slide where they stopped putting emotion and though into lyrics and instead headed towards (not-so) witty jokes and stupid sound effects to match. "Why Don't You Get a Job"'s success as a single solidified the approach to their terrible follow-up, Conspiracy of One. "Hit That" seemed just as bad. I would be extremely leery of purchasing an album by The Offspring again. Oh, and for graphic earlier work, you can't really match "Beheaded."

As to explicit lyrics stickers, a lot of the time they really seem to be about image. It's trendy to have one. I own somewhere nearing 80 CD's and only two have explicit lyrics stickers: Songs for the Deaf and Judas O. Judas O. is the B-Sides CD that comes with Rotten Apples, the Smashing Pumpkins greatest hits album. Songs for the Deaf, so far as I can understand the lyrics so far, has the outburst during "Six Shooter" and a fairly pervasive degree of sexual imagery, but it's hardly a swear-fest. Marginally adult. Judas O. contains the f-bomb about three times over the course of an 80-minute disk, some drug references, a song about infidelity and a song about date-rape. Frankly, I'm exceedingly surprised it received an explicit lyrics sticker, far more graphic content on the last two subjects is allowed in government sponsored Public Service Annoncements and that's far from an over-use of the f-bomb, especially in lieu of any other cursewords.

Anyway, what I'm really saying is that there's no need for something to be labeled Explicit Lyrics to be dark, serious and adult. Alice in Chains managed to never release an album with an Explicit Lyrics sticker, and frankly, I haven't seen anyone talk about heroin more than them.





Quote
Re: Karen O.
Posted by blu_chze on Thu Apr 8th at 3:38am 2004


Got offsprings 2 latest albums, rockin absolutely, but their ealier stuff is like meh

? posted by Orpheus
? posted by Vash
Offspring rocks you.

hmmm, the process of creating offspring rocks for sure.

Straight over teh tops of everyones heads...or is every one actually focusing on topic

[addsig]





Post Reply