Re: Quick and dirty HTML question
Posted by Monqui on Thu Apr 15th at 3:34pm 2004
That's it? Wow- I figgured it was something simple like that, but yow. That would explain why I couldn't see anything in the source code for a few sites I checked out :/
Thanks!
[addsig]

Monqui
member
743 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 20th 2002
Location: Iowa, USA
Occupation: Poor College Student
Re: Quick and dirty HTML question
Posted by Leperous on Thu Apr 15th at 8:48pm 2004
Some do have a <link rel="favicon" snippet of code or the like, don't know if it helps the browser pick up on the icons though (never seem to work 100% for any browser!)

Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Re: Quick and dirty HTML question
Posted by Monqui on Thu Apr 15th at 9:04pm 2004
Nothing ever does... I had a nice simple little table, set up with a height of 150 px, and in IE it was pulling some uber-random shade of grey out of its ass and padding about 20 pixels below the table with it- there was NO mention of that color ANYWHERE in the document (so it was basically setting the height of the table to 170 px)... It worked fine in Firefox... Adding in a "valign='top'" attribute to the tr's cleared it up for IE.
I hate things like that... Makes you think of bizzare solutions to mundane problems. Gah.
[addsig]

Monqui
member
743 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 20th 2002
Location: Iowa, USA
Occupation: Poor College Student
Re: Quick and dirty HTML question
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Thu Apr 15th at 9:07pm 2004
This is why tables are evil, and css is your god.
[addsig]

Kage_Prototype
member
1248 posts
165 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 10th 2003
Location: Manchester UK
Occupation: Student