Posted by Leperous on Wed Jun 16th at 8:35pm 2004
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Gwil on Thu Jun 17th at 6:28pm 2004
Thats on Firefox 0.9, dunno about IE - just get a blank page with submit? URL in the address panel.. ^_^
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Thu Jun 17th at 11:37pm 2004
Campaignjunkie
member
1309 posts
291 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: West Coast, USA
Occupation: Student
Posted by Monqui on Fri Jun 18th at 2:46pm 2004
But basically, say I post something, and it turns out to be the 17th post, then I sign off. Then, say 15 more people post- that brings the post count for that topic up to 32, thus adding a new page. Clicking on the snark piccy will only jump to the 30th post, not taking into account the other 12 posts that came up since the last visit.
Ehh? [addsig]
Monqui
member
743 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 20th 2002
Location: Iowa, USA

Occupation: Poor College Student
Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jun 18th at 3:05pm 2004
first off it makes perfect sense, it also did back on page 39 when i did it.. but so far all i can see thats been added to solve this issue is this..

this does help tremendously, so i am not bitching, but it would be much nicer if, the site knew i had not been here for whatever how long and go to that page in the thread..
it may be asking for more code than its worth, so i am content.. but still it is a suggestion of note, for those people who happen to be away for a few days..
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Monqui on Fri Jun 18th at 3:35pm 2004
If it's anything like what I'm thinking, all that you would have to do is whilst checking to see how many posts are in a certain thread (which I assume is done, since there are the jump-to numbers) also check to see which number post is the oldest. Once you have that number, simply change the start part of the snark pic link from whatever post to start at to:
(15 * ((int) ($newPostNumber/15)))
or something along those lines... [addsig]
Monqui
member
743 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 20th 2002
Location: Iowa, USA

Occupation: Poor College Student
Posted by Leperous on Fri Jun 18th at 7:35pm 2004
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Jun 19th at 3:46pm 2004
suggestion:
i would like to see a place here for a real name.. could be left blank for those whom wish it kept so, but.. many of us use our real names anyways.. its no more intrusive than "location" is ![]()

Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Gwil on Sat Jun 19th at 4:05pm 2004
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Forceflow on Tue Jun 22nd at 8:34pm 2004
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by scary_jeff on Tue Jun 22nd at 11:07pm 2004
Agreed on the new stuff that keeps appearing.. I often see something I haven't before and think 'cool'
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Jun 22nd at 11:20pm 2004
| ? posted by scary_jeff |
| Agreed on the new stuff that keeps appearing.. I often see something I haven't before and think 'cool' |
i made a suggestion to lep via PM, to address this very thing..
hopefully he will do it ![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Wed Jun 23rd at 3:11am 2004
I've had an idea. It might be interesting to see how effective the editing database is. for instance you could have a statistic like this:
% effectiveness = ((#Searches-#posts)/#Searches)*100.
Assuming that every search that does not result in a post constitutes a solved problem this would give you the percentage of questions which are already in the database. It might be pointless, but it would be interesting.
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd at 3:26am 2004
what if:
the editing forum mods made for sure, that each question, that is answered correctly, has a key word in the title..
it is my opinion, that the search-able database is missing stuff for two serious reasons.
1) lazy people not searching,
or
2) the database has no certainties when looking.
seems to me, that if the forum thread title asks "i have a question" but the thread is about lights.rad file editing.. the search option may miss it.
opinion???
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Leperous on Wed Jun 23rd at 3:37pm 2004
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd at 3:55pm 2004
| ? posted by Leperous |
| If people are too stupid/lazy to do a proper search for their problems, then good luck to them and their illustrious mapping career. |
i tend to agree whole heartedly.. but i try my damnedest not to act on this belief. people are just naturally lazy, their first instinct is to bother the multitudes with their inquiries..
but, this is the site suggestion thread, and if we cannot suggest how to improve stupid people, well its a wasted thread.
bottomline, i feel the only way to discourage lazy, is to point it out whenever we see it, so if you see a question you know has a searchable answer.. resist the urge to answer it again, and point them back to the database.
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by ReNo on Thu Jun 24th at 1:14pm 2004
ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by Kage_Prototype on Fri Jul 2nd at 6:54pm 2004
I am uploading a different image, but it's the same filename.
Here are the offenders:
http://www.snarkpit.com/pits/kage_prototype/sewer/t_00.jpg
http://www.snarkpit.com/pits/kage_prototype/sewer/t_01.jpg
http://www.snarkpit.com/pits/kage_prototype/sewer/t_02.jpg
The most annoying part of all this is that it doesn't happen to any large image files, only the thumbnails...this same problem is occuring in my profile as well -- the thumbnails don't change, yet the larger images do.
[EDIT]: Ok, now it seems this isn't exactly the case. In my profile, only one large image has been updated (i.e. the second one). Frustrat'd! [addsig]
Kage_Prototype
member
1248 posts
165 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 10th 2003
Location: Manchester UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Forceflow on Sun Jul 4th at 9:28am 2004
[addsig]
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by beer hunter on Sun Jul 4th at 9:52am 2004
| ? quote: |
| Is this a bug or just a crazy user ? If so, slap him. I just can't believe someone submits his map like ... 7 times. |
Its a bug with SP and Navigator Mozilla when adding a map to your profile, it comes up with a text error message and it doesn't look as tho' the maps been added to your profile but it has
took me a while to work that one out, i mentioned this a while back.beer hunter
member
281 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 6th 2003
Location: The Pub

Occupation: Beer taster

Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0473 seconds.

