Google bbcode has been added: e.g. cheese though it doesn't like being reversed, can't be arsed to write that in right now

Good idea ding, I'll have a think as to how I can make that work...

? quoting Leperous

... and Dark|killer, in his infinite n00bism, gets himself banned for failing to understand the subtle nuances of the 10 day ban and planning to hack the website (he has an l337 coder friend, apparently!)

THAAAANK YOOOOU LOOOORDDD

with the massive influx of new people has also resulted in a massive influx of tutorials. some have proved informative, some not. many have been very poorly implemented as well, and as such are not as desirable as the better worded/constructed counterparts.

we need to either be more stringent in our accepting of tutorial, or we need to send them back for tweaking. creating a monstrosity that involves almost 1 full megs of screen shots is not acceptable. how it could slip though the crack is unknown, but closer inspection must be enforced.

poorly worded, or vague ideas are also not a choice, and should be returned for better results.

if the members are to utilize this resource, it must be with the very least amount of trouble necessary to illustrate an informative tutorial. tutorials cannot always be short, but they must be concise, or as concise as the topic will allow.

if the people responsible for the authorization of these tutorials is not able to check them fully due to time constraints, or whatever real life may be, perhaps some sort of a voting system can be implemented where a tutorial can be more closely monitored by the users. if a tutorial receives enough legitimate complaints, it is removed.

legitimate does not mean 10 complaints of the same problem, it can also mean 10 different complaints all of one each. as long as each complaint is real, and not just bad relations with members personalities. this would eliminate the retaliatory attempts from the members whom had to rewrite their tutorial.

the present authorization procedure is allowing poor examples to slip though and needs to be addressed, before the pile gets to big to sift through. before long, the problem will be so intimidating that only course of action, will be no action at all, and this is entirely unacceptable.

/ 2 cents.