| ? posted by Leperous |
| Mmm, quick reply goodness |
Amen to that brother, wondered when this one would make an appearance ![]()
| ? posted by Leperous |
| Mmm, quick reply goodness |
Amen to that brother, wondered when this one would make an appearance ![]()

gwil, your new avatar makes me itch, i never trusted south paws ![]()

It shows as a new line when I'm making the reply, just not once posted. When I edit the post it also shows up fine. Havent a clue whats wrong, never had problems with it before 

Line break test.
Line breaks? Hmm... Sorry about that, should work now
Sorry about the counter, but that's what you get for using inferior browsers, etc. etc. etc. etc. blah blah
It'll be gone pretty soon anyway and replaced with the proper reply thingummy.
I find this kind of funny
Supposed to be deleted within a week its been there since SPv4 started. Just thought I'd point that out. Please dont delete them though Lep.
[addsig]
| ? posted by Alien_Sniper |
| Any reasons against substituting the reply button in pm's for a quick reply type box underneath? edit: No it's not from laziness, it just might be a little less fiddley. Yes, fiddly. |
or, adding a multiple destination reply??
[addsig]
| ? posted by Alien_Sniper |
| That was decided against because of possible abuse/misuse. However, if Lep decided to introduce different levels for members he could give selected people the power to mass message. Another option would be to limit it to about 10 or 15 people. |
so, we should punish all on a what if...
alrighty then.
we already have block ability.. that would effectively end all abuse after the 1st cases..
[addsig]
| ? quote: |
|
? posted by Jon we already have block ability.. that would effectively end all abuse after the 1st cases.. |
| ? posted by Alien_Sniper |
Nothing to stop future Rugals making loads of accounts and being prats. |
except leps fine ability to IP block..
he could also create a work-in-progress name blocking system..
no names with questionable content.. IE puss,c**k,ass,etc,etc
the database would require some effort initially, but in a few months i bet you could get most combinations blocked..
if by chance, someone insists on using a word thats blocked, he could send a message to lep for authorization..
just a thought..
[addsig]


