You might want to try this editor. It has a feature that converts any selected text to lowercase and viceversa. It has a lot of very cool other features too including syntax highlighting for almost ANY language (incl HTML, ASM and so on), you can assign special macros to your F9 - F12 keys for various filetypes and so on... Plus it's pretty small.
</plug>
Wouldn't mind if it could point out my PHP syntax errors though!
| ? quoting Crono |
|
Which flavor of assmebly do you have to use? There is no standard for assembly language, thus there are different syntax standards for different versions (NASM, MASM, TASM) Macs assembly language doesn't even use "mov" to move stuff is uses like ... bsd or something that starts with a 'b', which makes no sense. |
Hmm I should've been more specific. ConTEXT supports 80x86 assembly syntax. We're required to use MASM (with a 16bit linker) and it seems to be compatible with most instructions and directives so far.
small bug..
situation: you log in, you take to long to reply, you time out..
you get the message you need to log in first, but the link.. leads to no place.
however, if you back up a couple pages, and use the link there, it works..
by then, you have lost your post..
[addsig]
this isn't really a suggestion more of a question, anywhos, why was the snarkpit changed from v.3 to v.4?
[addsig]| ? quoting $loth |
|
anywhos, why was the snarkpit changed from v.3 to v.4? |
because we came up with so many new ideas, the old version wouldn't support them
each version, was a marked step up.
[addsig]on the other side of the coin, we have members who have contributed a fairly tiny portion to the site, but have extraordinary high marks..
the ONLY reason i have not brought this up before, is because i was afraid the system would be scrapped if it was noticed that they have such high scores when valued members are so low. before anyone scoff's, it is a real concern because the snarkmark system has never been fully accepted, and it would be a shame to lose something that can work if the kinks are worked out.
since we the members do not know the exact ratio's the marks are divided by, its really hard to suggest a solution.. would it be possible to post the current ratio so we can work from there? 
[edit] this is not intended to sound like an elitist comment, you are more than welcome to apply any term you feel comfortable with to assign value to the people who contribute more to the snarkpit as a whole.. i only chose "valued" because i couldn't come up with any other term less specific.
[/edit]
[addsig]
