US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Post Reply
Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 11:31am 2004


? posted by Orpheus

i think, that if you cannot dig deeply enough to find any british/UK atrocities (which obviously exist as well), that you should not post any american ones..

Shut up. We were talking about the worldwide-headline-news, not bashing America.





Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by scary_jeff on Sun May 2nd at 12:22pm 2004


? quote:
Interesting followup to the UK version:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3677311.stm


? quote:
you cannot dig deeply enough to find any british/UK atrocities


Erm?




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 1:25pm 2004


Orph, go re-read the title of the thread. My US comments are aimed at the US planning of the war, they planned and directed it. Their are UK photos (from the most dubious sources...).

Knee jerk reactions are not your friend.

[addsig]



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Orpheus on Sun May 2nd at 1:49pm 2004


? posted by Leperous
? posted by Orpheus

i think, that if you cannot dig deeply enough to find any british/UK atrocities (which obviously exist as well), that you should not post any american ones..

Shut up. We were talking about the worldwide-headline-news, not bashing America.

*glares at lep*

watch your mouth..!!

you have never heard me say anything about bashing americans, nor i doubt will you.

the day i need to shut up, cause some mouthy kids says so will be a sad day indeed TBH.

now, as i said, i have a friend who was f**king there, its hardly a localized issue, but i do feel it is exceedingly inflammatory to pose it as such..

lep, either stay neutral, or you may shut up and show me how its done

that was totally, uncalled for.. and in all honesty, i would accept someones word whom i trust, and was there over any news feed.

*mumbles*

one of these days, you will go to far.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 2:29pm 2004


I'll remember you said that the next time you call me a prick, then



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Orpheus on Sun May 2nd at 3:33pm 2004


this is a very small excerpt from a very private email i received, i don't think its betraying any confidences, cause its nothing personal.. and considering only one person here prolly knows whom its from anyways, the quote is basically anonymous.

? quote:
After Iraq, some of the lads didn't even care that they'd taken lives, not even those of the the conscripts or civilians. If they had a shred of remorse, they concealed it well. I don't ever want to have such callous disregard for the loss of human life. Even during peacekeeping, an unprofessional few demonstrated no respect toward the locals. I know I'm not the same as these people but I live with them, socialize with them and work with them. I'm afraid it's only a matter of time before my own set of values and standards begin to fall.

the only reason i quoted this at all, is because the person whom sent me this letter, is not the same person who went to war.. he sounded so much like you c**ky kids around here, it was basically stereotypical, now... he is different.

i can only attribute it to what he saw, or did, and honestly i feel he may someday need to come to terms with those visions.. but bottom-line, he has told me things about iraq, and frankly, few of the tales compare to what you guys keep posting for the rest of us to read..

i think, i will take his word for it, and let the rest of you keep reading the tripe..

i think if something can transform this c**ky kid into the person who wrote what you just read... its relevant..

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 3:45pm 2004


Orph, I fail to see how that is relevant to what this debate was about, and youre only making yourself look worse by showing your prejudice against so called "c**ky kids"...

You're digging a big hole for yourself, and i'm afraid there's no ladder out of it.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 4:51pm 2004


1) We discuss the alleged mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners, discussion dies down

2) I post a news item relating to a similar incident supposedly carried out by British forces, in which the article points out that it is likely to be fake.

3) Orph comes in and says "if you cannot dig deeply enough to find any british/UK atrocities (which obviously exist as well), that you should not post any american ones"

3) I say, "Shut up. We were talking about the worldwide-headline-news, not bashing America."

4) You retort with "watch your mouth..!!" and have a go.

5) I point out you've called me a prick before in the past.

6) You retort by calling us "c**ky kids".

/wonders who is derailing the thread





Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Orpheus on Sun May 2nd at 5:08pm 2004


you also, act as if its the first time i erred..

sadly, if the title had said "coalition prisoner abuse in iraq" the subject might have been neutral..

call it anyway you wish, but the topic is blatantly biased.. i still say it is, and no ladder or holes will alter that viewpoint.

next time.. begin your topic heading, less focused, generalize the damned thing for christ sakes.

am i so unbiased that only i can see it was a dig?

and lep, i don't need your counting skills demonstrated, its a sure sign, of a c**ky f**king kid

now.. if you wanna discus it as adults, i am game... but gwil and lep.. you proved my point, you failed miserably to disprove it.. even IF my point was irrelevant to the topic, you still proved i was right about your age. you can be 30 or 40 and still think like a c**ky kid .. shoot you guys think i am childish daily.. whats the diff?

if this subject is truly and unbiasedly about abused iraqis.. so be it.. but i don't see it as such, nor does it necessarily have to be so.

the topic.. was derailed when a member was specifically told to "SHUT UP" .. till then, it was typical snarkpit idle forum banter.. if you don't see it as such.. so what..

for the record, there is no such thing as being prejudiced against c**ky kids... its not as if its a born afliction. its a state of mind, or mindset... actually i guess prejudiced is accutrate enuff, in a VERY BROAD sense of the word .. its about as accurate as saying, you are prejudiced against people, who dislike c**ky kids.. yeah it would take a very long ladder to reach that one..

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by scary_jeff on Sun May 2nd at 5:15pm 2004


I just don't see how he can generalise it when he started the thread about a particular news story! If he generalised it, it wouldnt have been about the news story Lep wanted to discuss. And he didn't say 'coalition' instead of 'US/coalition', because at the time he posted it, only news of the US version was available. The 'UK version' only came out yesterday... Why is Lep wrong for wanting to talk aobut this particular issue? It seems to me that he is only wrong because this particular issue concerns american troops. If it had been australians in the same situation, I somehow don't think you would have come in with the same arguement Orph.



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on Sun May 2nd at 5:19pm 2004


? quote:
next time.. begin your topic heading, less focused, generalize the damned thing for christ sakes.

am i so unbiased that only i can see it was a dig?


...because it actually was US forces involved?

I suppose "some guys do bad things to some other guys in some country" would have been more generalized, but then no one would have a clue what the hell anyone was talking about. [addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 5:21pm 2004


Quote (Thread Title)

"US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq" - posted before UK soldiers were allegedly shown undertaking the same acts.

Quote - Gwil

"Either way this is just another calamity thats going to inflame the situation between Arab nations and the West. Laced with the typical irony, hypocracy and general illegalness that dogs the Bush administration, hopefully it will spur other countries on to speak out against the USA without fear of repercussion.."

[ed- this is not an attack on american citizens. it is aimed at the army, the government and the soldiers who carried out these deeds. please note also im not saying UK soldiers are squeeky clean or anything either, im commenting on this particular story. thank you ]

Quote - Gwil

I agree though that more could be done by other countries to levy the situation, particuarly people like France (who need to repair themselves after the UN Oil For Food scandal) and Russia also....

Quote - Gwil

All i'm saying is that the US/UK administration and the US army should think about the repercussions of their approach toward policing the country, and particuarly their own forces.

Quote - Gwil

And yes, I accept you can't account for what will happen in a war, but their whole policy on rebuilding Iraq is deeply flawed (I can name other examples if people want to accuse me of being a raging lefty with an agenda against the US ) with a horrible bias for western businesses

Quote - Yak Fighter (hint)

I don't think the US administration did much planning at all for an occupation.

I shall say no more on the issue, I think these quotes highlight the relevant points perfectly well.

(and if anyone DARES to try and point out my leaning toward arguing the USA points there I point them to the fact this is a thread based on a story about American soldiers, in the american army in an american led war. Who the f**k am I supposed to talk about? Cuba?)

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 5:24pm 2004


? posted by Leperous

However, I think any condemnation of the US military/government for this is just stupid and shortsighted.

Some people, eh. Anyway!





Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 5:26pm 2004


Not really, who was in charge of setting up the internment schemes in their region? ^_^

These soldiers are the effect, the people who are running the show above are the cause.

Also I find it terribly sad people under the age of x cannot express opinions, thoughts or feelings on issues, national and international for fear of being labelled c**ky, or a rebel.. or similar. Alienate the future generations and your dredge up the past ^_^

[addsig]



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 5:28pm 2004


Fair point- it would have made sense to bring in some prison experts on the same boat as oil experts



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Orpheus on Sun May 2nd at 5:30pm 2004


? posted by KungFuSquirrel
? quote:
next time.. begin your topic heading, less focused, generalize the damned thing for christ sakes.

am i so unbiased that only i can see it was a dig?


...because it actually was US forces involved?

I suppose "some guys do bad things to some other guys in some country" would have been more generalized, but then no one would have a clue what the hell anyone was talking about.

listen to what you just said.. jeez andrew..

if someone had said "building fire set by arsonist" it would have been the same as "gay arsonist sets building on fire???"

and, please don't act as if i would have been suddenly correct, if i had left out the "c**kY" statement either... most of you know whom, or what i am talking about.. the fact is, many of you are c**ky, its not a damned crime, its just exceedingly annoying is all.

the point is, things happen, its not localized to US of UK, or any other country, so why does the heading have to lead it that direction?

just once i would love to see either an unbiased post topic, or one that begins with someone researching a UK incident..

i realize, honest i do that the kids of the UK must think this is a topic worthy of discussing, but even my unbiased patience has its limits..

call me what you like, i could care less.. as i said, i didn't read nothing past the title, and after i saw the biased nature of it, the content became moot.. even if every single piece of it was 100% true, i turned a blind eye, because it was wrong to post it in such a light.

ask yourselves, how can someone as un-politically minded as i am care otherwise??? post government atrocities till you get blisters on your damned fingers i don't care, but even my broad nature can see the topic was pointedly US bashing.. even if its not, it says it is.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Leperous on Sun May 2nd at 5:32pm 2004


Who do you think bought a bloody UK incident into this thread?! Do you follow the news at all? Why don't you go berate CNN et al for bringing this to our attention and being so un-American, or are we at fault for discussing it?



Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 5:38pm 2004


Orpheus i'd happily post topics on many issues - the IMF, world bank, zimbabwe, north korea, nafta, rwanda, the UN, changing roles of nato etc etc.. they have limited discussion potential though.

im afraid when the country is as big as the united states, its actions have repercussions all over the world, and more or less everyone will have an opinion on a large USA related issue... view it as biased if you like, im biased against illegality, war, violence and social injustice (and then some). Not America as a country or as a representation of its citizens.. when referring to the US/USA (being an ex-history student) usually (99.9% of the time) means US Government/Administration/Army.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Orpheus on Sun May 2nd at 5:38pm 2004


*sighs*

look guys, my point was not to prove or disprove the threads contents.

it was to attempt to stall anyone bashing only.. the topic is very biased, no matter how you rationalize it otherwise.

i know, you all are very much more informed than i care to be, thats OK.. you are supposed to be.

but damn, i get so tired of the fights around here, and any time a UK resident, post a topic beginning with US, it leads down a path i care not to read.

as i said, this war changed a kid, just like most of you here.. i worry for him because of it.. but thats another story, and a private one.

just please, stop posting nationalities into the topic header.. it can never lead to rational debates

[addsig]




Quote
Re: US/Coalition prisoner abuse in Iraq
Posted by Gwil on Sun May 2nd at 5:40pm 2004


it was an international news story about american troops... there is pretty much no other way of labelling it - and note I did say coalition as well. I hate the UK government, PM and involvement in this war a whole lot more than I hate your countries trust me [addsig]




Post Reply