you also, act as if its the first time i erred..
sadly, if the title had said "coalition prisoner abuse in iraq" the subject might have been neutral..
call it anyway you wish, but the topic is blatantly biased.. i still say it is, and no ladder or holes will alter that viewpoint.
next time.. begin your topic heading, less focused, generalize the damned thing for christ sakes.
am i so unbiased that only i can see it was a dig?
and lep, i don't need your counting skills demonstrated, its a sure sign, of a c**ky f**king kid 
now.. if you wanna discus it as adults, i am game... but gwil and lep.. you proved my point, you failed miserably to disprove it.. even IF my point was irrelevant to the topic, you still proved i was right about your age. you can be 30 or 40 and still think like a c**ky kid
.. shoot you guys think i am childish daily.. whats the diff?
if this subject is truly and unbiasedly about abused iraqis.. so be it.. but i don't see it as such, nor does it necessarily have to be so.
the topic.. was derailed when a member was specifically told to "SHUT UP" .. till then, it was typical snarkpit idle forum banter.. if you don't see it as such.. so what..
for the record, there is no such thing as being prejudiced against c**ky kids... its not as if its a born afliction. its a state of mind, or mindset... actually i guess prejudiced is accutrate enuff, in a VERY BROAD sense of the word
.. its about as accurate as saying, you are prejudiced against people, who dislike c**ky kids.. yeah it would take a very long ladder to reach that one.. 
[addsig]