I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Post Reply
Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by Orpheus on Thu May 13th at 9:23pm 2004


Some images in this post have been automatically down-sized, click on them to view the full sized versions:

*bumps*

well i spent about an hour adjusting scores today.. the good news, no one went down, so if you notice a difference in your score, twas prolly me..

the bad news, many already had 5's so i couldn't help those

the really bad news, i could not find 56 people to score a 5 to, so i could not displace vash as top dog in the nicest user category, tis sad, there just are not 56 people here that damned good :/

consider, only the right bar.. thats how many people i have scored here at the pit.. that far right, signifies 5/5 .. i have score perhaps 50 people that high.. now compare it to the yellow (the 3/5)

not many people left i bet.. i imagine i can get those by next week

[addsig]




Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by ReNo on Thu May 13th at 10:59pm 2004


Whoa, you don't give you many 4's do you orph? Bit odd you give out so many 3's and so many 5's, but so few of the one in between. I'm the opposite - 4 is my most common, with 3 being pretty common and 5 being quite a hard to get grade. I can only think of about four people I've rated a 5 off the top of my head - as the top grade I feel it should be given out only to those with a decent amount of evidence of their extraordinary ability [addsig]



Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by Orpheus on Thu May 13th at 11:06pm 2004


reminds Duncan:

i use the rating system incorrectly (according to lep)

i see it as a personal rating, and as such 3 is middle (neutral) ground..

you join the pit, you are nothing, to no one, a "3"

now you do well, you go up, you do poorly, you go down..

i realize, that if everyone doesn't use the system this way, it tends to skew, but.. i just cannot accept leps definition of how the system works.. it just makes more sense my way.. but as i said, if i am the only one...

in the end though, what i give you is based mostly on how i feel you have benefited the pit as a whole, and all one need do is ask me how i scored them and i will tell them.. i am not ashamed, and actually proud of it..

i walk to the beat of a different drummer

[addsig]




Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by omegaslayer on Fri May 14th at 2:18am 2004


I have also noticed a trend, most new map posts are maps that are either conceptual ideas, or maps that wont even get done. [addsig]



Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by ReNo on Fri May 14th at 2:33am 2004


Thats because more of us are mucking around with hammer for fun and practice than for the creation of full maps. Since nobody plays them anymore (basically), whether a map turns into something complete or nothing more than a "scene" makes little difference to me, and I think there are others who are much the same. Of course, if a map has good gameplay potential, I'll probably complete it, but if its nothing more than a pretty picture, why bother "completing" it? [addsig]



Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Fri May 14th at 4:59am 2004


? posted by omegaslayer4777
I have also noticed a trend, most new map posts are maps that are either conceptual ideas, or maps that wont even get done.

Chances are, 1 out of every 10 maps actually gets finished. I have quite possibly a few dozens worth of RMF concepts that I'll never actually finish; but hey, they were good for practice, right?

[addsig]




Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by Mr.Ben on Fri May 14th at 6:20am 2004


Nope [addsig]



Quote
Re: I have noticed a definite trend of late.
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Fri May 14th at 6:53am 2004


? posted by Mr.Ben
Nope

No one asked you! Go work on the silos!

[addsig]





Post Reply