| ? quote: |
| ooh i see;so Pentium is a 586, i suppose; i started with a 286... that was so slow.... and i used to play "prince of persia".... |
...Not really. A Pentium chip is a Pentium ... the architecture that the board and chip uses is x86. 256, 386, 486, etc. were models based on 'generations' of the architecture, if I'm not mistaken.
However, I don't remember the first x86 machines name. But it was 8-bit addressable (at this point in time, the processor speed did represent the total performance speed of the computer). Then they made it 16-bit, and then in the early-mid eighties, they were able to up it to 32-bit. Now, we're going into 64. Oddly enough, 64-bit computers (for the most part) are not x86.
The AMD Athlon 64 is though
There are a bunch of architectures, so it's best not to try to label them on your own, just look them up.
Surprisingly, someone who took that survey had an IBM360 somewhere! I wonder if he programs hardware on it ... if he does ... he must be a genius
Oh, just a little trivial 'fact'. Next to the IBM 360, the x86 architecture is the ugliest architecture to date.
It's rather inefficient, but, its only saving grace is that it's consistent.
In the 70s someone, I forget who, I want to say Borland, had a stack machine. Basically the machine ran off of a stack, only. It wasn't byte addressable. So, you had to push and pop to send and get information. It was a fairly simple machine and when programmed properly it blew away the x86 ... however, if you're familure with the stack, you'll note that it is NOT constant. So, with the machine you couldn't really rely on certain speeds. [addsig]









