Posted by Orpheus on Mon Oct 4th at 8:51pm 2004
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Mon Oct 4th at 9:27pm 2004
Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Leperous on Mon Oct 4th at 9:55pm 2004
Schrodinger's cat is more linked into the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is about how it's meant to be our consciousness which determines reality, and how it has to be us (as observers) which decide if the cat if dead or not. It's sort of the same as that analogy, in that they're both saying that a person has to be there for there for either to exist... though I think Schrodinger's cat is large enough for spontaneous quantum reduction to occur, i.e. it doesn't actually happen in real life ![]()
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Gwil on Mon Oct 4th at 10:03pm 2004
| ? quote: |
Schrodinger's cat is more linked into the Copenhagen
interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is about how it's meant to
be our consciousness which determines reality, and how it has to be us
(as observers) which decide if the cat if dead or not. It's sort of the
same as that analogy, in that they're both saying that a person has to
be there for there for either to exist... though I think Schrodinger's
cat is large enough for spontaneous quantum reduction to occur, i.e. it
doesn't actually happen in real life |
What he said.
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Oct 4th at 10:19pm 2004
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Mon Oct 4th at 10:23pm 2004
| ? posted by Leperous |
|
though I think Schrodinger's cat is large enough for spontaneous quantum reduction to occur, i.e. it doesn't actually happen in real life |
Obveously.
Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by OtZman on Mon Oct 4th at 11:09pm 2004
http://www.phobe.com/s_cat/s_cat.html
*tries to find a cat smiley*
a monkey'll do[addsig]
OtZman
member
1890 posts
199 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 12th 2003
Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Oct 4th at 11:26pm 2004
contrary to what i may lead you to believe, the cat lives/dies theory is not unheard of to me.. i just found it only vaguely interesting when i heard it as a boy, and even less now.. i would be far more inclined to discuss the "if a tree fell" theory, or even the "do bears s**t in the woods" one.
even as a child, it disturbed me deeply to contemplate any theory where something had to die to prove it out.. it reminded me of a discussion we had in high school.. the topic was, "if you knew someone was going to commit suicide, what would you do to prevent it?" sadly i came to the conclusion that, those who want to.. succeed, those who don't succeed, only wanted attention.. IMO, if you could convince someone just how long dead lasts, that would be deterrent enough to save any worth saving.. ![]()
as i said, i hated theories that involved killing something 
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by mazemaster on Tue Oct 5th at 12:15am 2004
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Oct 5th at 12:33am 2004
| ? posted by mazemaster |
| The cat living or dying has nothing to do with the theory. It's just one example of it. Thats like saying you hate the theory of gravity because if someone jumped off a building they would accelerate downwards to their death. |
people have jumped without dying maze..
if i misinterpreted the concept, its only because it has no interest for me to do otherwise..
wouldn't be the first time, sadly i feel it won't be the last.
i apologize to anyone who understands the theory and me ruining it for them :/
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Hugh on Tue Oct 5th at 12:42am 2004
| ? posted by Orpheus | ||
people have jumped without dying maze.. |
That's what they want you to believe. They being the pro-business bulldogs of the evil corporate American empire, of course. I mean, who else would it be, the... anti-antacid cohorts of wholesome female booty?!?! Of course not! So let's be serious.
And that just about sums up this thread to my mind, most likely because I am a... erm... intellectual inferiorite.
Hugh
member
900 posts
170 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 25th 2003
Location: Amerika

Occupation: College Student
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Oct 5th at 12:49am 2004
i think, one of us needs a lobotomy hugh ![]()
you make me laugh so hard sometimes ![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Forceflow on Wed Oct 6th at 8:53pm 2004
[addsig]
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Wed Oct 6th at 10:31pm 2004
Sounds fun to me.
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Agent Smith on Thu Oct 7th at 6:47am 2004
Ok then, we'll do the same times/days as I worked out before, its now just a matter of picking a server. G.Ballblue had a good idea of picking an empty server, if someone could suggest one, as I don't have a clue when it comes to Europe/US servers.
Agent Smith
member
803 posts
200 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: NSW, Australia

Occupation: Uni Student
Posted by Forceflow on Thu Oct 7th at 2:57pm 2004
[addsig]
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by Agent Smith on Thu Oct 7th at 2:59pm 2004
It's already done. Of course if this doesn't suit a lot of people, we can work something else out.
| ? posted by Agent Smith |
|
Ok, I've done some rough calculations, and assuming we're going to play on the weekend, that being friday night/saturday/sunday, If the people in the US start playing at around 3pm on saturday (GMT -8.00), the people in Europe play at around 11pm on saturday (GMT), and the people in Australia play at around 9am on sunday (GMT +10.00), we should all be on at the same time. I'm willing to get up at 9am on sunday to try this out. I don't know how this works for everyone else. |
Agent Smith
member
803 posts
200 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: NSW, Australia

Occupation: Uni Student
Posted by ReNo on Thu Oct 7th at 3:53pm 2004
Who else is going to be playing CS:S from tonight though?
[addsig]
ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by Agent Smith on Thu Oct 7th at 9:10pm 2004
Thats fine me with Reno, I wasn't sure how late you or Gwil be willing to do this. It suits me fine.
I'd love to be playing CS: Source tonight, but unfortanetly my copy of CS: CZ is about 8 months late, courtesy of Vivendi.
Agent Smith
member
803 posts
200 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: NSW, Australia

Occupation: Uni Student
Posted by Gwil on Thu Oct 7th at 10:02pm 2004
But yeah, I can do 11pm right up to about 3am (finish at that time, not start!). Whatever floats other peoples boat, just gotta wait for ding to sort it now
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0117 seconds.


[addsig]