you know, i have heard this a time or two, but i always thought that we fell well within the guidelines.. is wanting mappers to stay within the limits of the half-life engine so hard that its considered "high standards"?

i am one of the critique writers, but i do not believe i have ever asked someone to do something that was impossibly difficult.. or even highly difficult..

i pose this question to my fellow pitters, "what is your definition of high standards"?

and

welcome back insanely obscure member of 4 years ago

[edit] no i am not asking for another r_speeds or fun factor debate.. i wanna know why "higher standards" sounds like a cuss word to some.

I use "high standards" as my own impression of your work... I'm a perfectionist so if i cant produce a map that I think is as good as Renos or Orph's (just to name a few..) I wont release it... plus i have a hard time learning to say enough is enough. My maps always ended up way to big.

so take "high standards" as a compliment to your work