Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 3:45pm 2004
Posted by ReNo on Wed Nov 24th at 3:47pm 2004
[addsig]
ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 3:48pm 2004
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Nov 24th at 3:55pm 2004
the difference between 3 and 4 is so marginal its not worth the idea of getting another camera
storage, thats where its at.. getting better storage, as in cheaper and bigger. the SD storage disks are cheap and hold a s**tload.
i would suggest investing the money in either storage or printing, not a 4 mp camera
to answer Duncan's question.. i have a 5.2 mp camera, but i only use the 1.2 mp option.. its great clarity and stores well. the documentation that came with my camera simply stated that 3.2 mp is perfectly optimized for 4"x6" photo reproduction.. sounded odd to me considering that 3.2 mp is far larger than 4x6.. i suppose it formats well or some such.
i have a 128mb SD card and 32 megs internal storage.. i can take 400+ pictures at 1.2mp.. believe me, i have tried to fill up the card alone which takes 320 pics.. its very difficult.
my advice, find the most common storage mode (around here its SD) and buy a camera that utilizes it.. so you can obtain it cheaply.. also buy last years model camera.. 5.2 is not top of the line anymore so you can get them cheaper than i did
/ 2 cents
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Gwil on Wed Nov 24th at 3:56pm 2004
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 4:00pm 2004
Well since mine is still nice I might as well go ahead and get some more storage. All I was planning on doing is taking a few pics and importing them into a map or two iv been workin on. But I cant bump map so I might wait.
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Nov 24th at 4:05pm 2004
things to look for in a camera
1) brand.. IMO at least in camera name is of some significance.
2) internal storage.. you will need some, whether you think you do or not.
3) external storage.. SD works great and is cheap.
4) USB ported.. make sure it will connect to your pc.. some are USB 1 and some are USB 2, if your computer is old, and the camera is new, the 1 and 2 may not talk to each other.. i am unsure of this though.
5) flash capable.. you need to have a flash, or no dark area pictures.
6) power source.. the batteries for cameras are expensive as hell.. i got one with rechargeable capabilities.
7) picture mode.. mine is in jpg i think.. but make sure its compatible with your machine.
i think thats about it.
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 4:08pm 2004
Posted by Crono on Wed Nov 24th at 4:24pm 2004
2.5 gigapixels.. interesting.
mmm detail. [addsig]
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 4:24pm 2004
Thats cool. Nice find I messed around with that for like 5 minutes.
Posted by Spartan on Wed Nov 24th at 4:27pm 2004
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 4:32pm 2004
Posted by fraggard on Wed Nov 24th at 4:36pm 2004
The average 3MP digital camera SUCKS. Most of them can't shoot in low light conditions unless the entire scene and the photographer stay still for almost 10-15 seconds. So you can forget the action shots. They have very low battery life, and almost no internal storage. Oh and the Flashes are crap.
My advice: If you're not interested in too much quality, buy a 4MP camera with at least 3x optical zoom. Digital Zoom is just a marketing gimmick. Try whatever you want to buy first in any lighting conditions you plan to use it in. Make sure the software you have to install is not crap. And make sure you have enough battery life, storage space, etc.
BTW: My Old Olympus OM10 beats almost any digital camera hands down in every department.
fraggard
member
1110 posts
201 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 8th 2002
Location: Bangalore, India

Occupation: Student
Posted by SWATSiLeNt on Wed Nov 24th at 6:44pm 2004
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Nov 24th at 7:10pm 2004
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by fishy on Wed Nov 24th at 7:41pm 2004
yup, i'd say the same about my old canon t50.
the main thing i would be looking at with a new digi camera, would be the lens size. as a general rule of thumb, the larger the lens diameter, the less barrel distotion you will get. it would also need a non-digital zoom of at least 5x.
[addsig]Posted by scary_jeff on Thu Nov 25th at 2:08am 2004
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Nov 25th at 2:09am 2004
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by scary_jeff on Thu Nov 25th at 2:14am 2004
There is a great article about choosing digital cameras and how megapixels are by no means the end of the story. But it is long, so you might not want to read it:
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article.php?directory=beyond_megapixels_part_1
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0139 seconds.

