What is bettter....?
Post Reply
Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Sushi on Sat Aug 30th at 6:03pm 2003


I know that Hammer is a newer version of Worldcraft; but a lot of people are still using WC 3.3. So my question is for the 'pros': Do you prefer Worldcraft 3.3 or Hammer ?



Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Aug 30th at 6:07pm 2003


? posted by Sushi
I know that Hammer is a newer version of Worldcraft; but a lot of people are still using WC 3.3. So my question is for the 'pros': Do you prefer Worldcraft 3.3 or Hammer ?

use the newest version, your PC can handle..

it is my understanding that, the difference is mainly in the video card.. i would go with hammer, simply because i like the newest of everything.. but at your level of experience.. 3.3 would suit just as well

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by KoRnFlakes on Sat Aug 30th at 7:07pm 2003


VHE3.5 Beta is good. lets you view models etc in editor.

Edit: This should be in general Banter...

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Vash on Sat Aug 30th at 7:34pm 2003


Aye, i have Hammer 3.4 because World Craft had way too many bugs, and hammer has most of them fixed.

As for Hammer 3.5, I used it for a few minutes, but im just going to stick with 3.4- im not going to bother find updated FGD`s for 3.5 and all that.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Aug 30th at 7:51pm 2003


? posted by Vash

Aye, i have Hammer 3.4 because World Craft had way too many bugs, and hammer has most of them fixed.

you know whats funny, in two years of using 3.3 and hearing about all those bugs, i never did find one of my own..

the only insurmountable obstacle that 3.3 posed was, my map "deja_vu_2" refused to convert from 2.1 to 3.3 .. otherwise, it ran smooth as silk

call me lucky i reckon..

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Vash on Sat Aug 30th at 7:54pm 2003


I dont know what your system specs are but some bugs included 3D window turning black(i think), lots of crashing, saving bugs, and other bugs i cant think of atm.

I think they all happen alot on older machines

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Aug 30th at 8:04pm 2003


i had 2 PC actually that used 3.3

1) K62 400 with 96 megs ram and a 16 meg voodoo banshee card- known bug, the card tended to over-accelerated, i had to slow it down to 3/4 of full.. 9this is the PC that had issues with DJV2 but it was not the pc's fault)

2) 1.4 GHZ Athlon T-Bird 512 megs ram ,with an Nvidia 64 meg 440se - no complications at all..

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Cash Car Star on Sat Aug 30th at 8:24pm 2003


I think you all know which editor is really better.



Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Leperous on Sat Aug 30th at 8:31pm 2003


? posted by Cash Car Star
I think you all know which editor is really better.

The one which 99% of mappers use, that was semi-created by Valve in the first place? Wait, by that reasoning, Windows is the best OS in the world... "they're all as good as each other in their own special way, children"





Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by Edge Damodred on Sun Aug 31st at 1:06am 2003


? posted by Cash Car Star
I think you all know which editor is really better.

Yeah, Unreal Ed is pretty great.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: What is bettter....?
Posted by fraggard on Sun Aug 31st at 3:24am 2003


Give in to the powers of Notepad. (cue eerie music and bad light effects)




Post Reply