OMG!!! Cass is onto something. maybe it was the fat controller himself that developed the new physics engine to make the earthquake bombs...........................
[addsig]Posted by Tracer Bullet on Thu Jan 6th at 12:00am 2005
No s**t, it's called capitalism and market economy - and this guy http://www.davidicke.com/ , is laughing all the way to the bank by exploiting people still living in the age of the X Files.
I could write any old tripe and link it randomly up with international events of past and present, and write books just like this guy.
Oh BTW it wont help coming back with conspiracy theories - we are just the mindless, brainwashed masses, after all. We believe in the government.
God the irony is seeping out to dangerously high levels...
I wish I had the balls to write stuff like that. I could make a fortune in pseudoscience!
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Thu Jan 6th at 12:03am 2005
I'm going to go study Deus Ex now, just so I'm prepared. It's like Warren Spector saw the future and is communicating it to us through a first person shooter... I really can live the future, today!!
[addsig]Yak_Fighter
member
1832 posts
406 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 30th 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Posted by Jahzel on Thu Jan 6th at 12:19am 2005
Well, OK, listen, I'm not going to waste my time trying to tell you about the New World Order. You're obviously treating the whole thing like one big joke, that's ok, that's for your own enjoyment, but it do you or your family and friends any favours in the near future. It's inevitable, it's like a trigger mechanism that generates ridicule. Sa the words 'New' 'World' 'Order' to an unsuspecting crowd and they will laugh, just as they are condtioned to.
"And to lash on the irony further, isn't the essence of this conspiracy theory the same that was at the heart of the Nazi desire to gain power - ie an international conspiracy of governments and jews.
Same s**t, different wording."
Yes, and the same techniques used by the Nazis as well as other dictatorships are still being used today. They are effective in that they delude the population into thinking that their 'saviour' (i.e. Adolf Hitler, George W Bush) is here to save them from evil. It worked and millions were enslaved in Nazi regime.
And yes it is the same sh*t different wording.
-
On Feb 27, 1933 Hitler Burned the Reichstag to consolidate centralised federal police power and undermine the German Constitution and take many of the freedoms of the German people.
-
On Apr 19, 1995 the explosion of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, helped Clinton to get his 2nd term as president. AND centralise federal police power and undermine the American Constitution and take many of the freedoms of the American people.
-
On Sep. 11, 2001, The Destruction of the WTC in New York and Washington, DC, helped Bush centralise federal police power and undermined the American Constitution and took many of the freedoms of the American people. In fact, the USA Patriot act power grab, makes Hitler look like a piker.
The next day after Hitler Burned the Reichstag, he used that as an excuse to round up his opponents and have them shot. Then he Issued his BIG DECREE, JUST LIKE THE CLINTON ANTI-TERROR LAWS, AND JUST LIKE THE BUSH PATRIOT USA ACT, THAT WAS SIMULTANEOUSLY PASSED IN THE OTHER 15 "USED TO BE FREE" NATIONS OF EUROPE AND AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.
HITLER WAS GIVEN POWER TO RULE BY DECREE. IT WAS BY LAW AN ACT OF TREASON TO SPEAK AGAINST NAZIS. Did you hear what happened to those who turned their back to Bush as he addressed the OSU commencement?
Let this be a warning to everybody; If you want to ignore the facts then prepare for a new Global Nazi Germany to emerge.
[addsig]
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Thu Jan 6th at 12:23am 2005
Cry about it why don't you.
There's no way Bush could become a Hitler-like dictator and hold power, considering the massive size of the US population and landmass, the wide variety of differing opinions and stances people hold, the lack of homogenity among the people, the incredible strength of the US economy, the number of guns owned by normal citizens, and the 50-50 split in the voting.
These are facts, that is reality. Pull your head out of your ass please.
[addsig]Yak_Fighter
member
1832 posts
406 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 30th 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Jan 6th at 12:23am 2005
you know, i dunno which is scarier, a thread less than 12 hours old is 84 replies long, or that some of the replies have scroll bars to read them with :/
you people, you can go on about the most mundane topics i swear. it would be refreshing to have one just once, thats important. truth, i dunno exactly what that topic will be, or could be, but this one..... ![]()
perhaps, its diminished because its all over the place, and doesn't stay true for more than one reply..
carry on gents.
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Cassius on Thu Jan 6th at 12:25am 2005
Let this be a warning to everybody; If you want to ignore the facts then prepare for a new Global Nazi Germany to emerge.
How soon? I'll get my tin foil hat ready.
Posted by Gwil on Thu Jan 6th at 12:30am 2005
Also, your facts on Germany are skewed at best - how do I know? I studied it for 8 years (another reason why I can't be arsed to be drawn in on a debate with it as one of the issues).
You believe what you like, and we will believe what we like - but given there is no hard, factual evidence to back any of it up i'll stick with a normal, healthy dose of cynicism. The administration is crooked, and misaligned with most people in every country.
It's called politics, and politicians - most people dislike them, everyone thinks they can do a better job, but it's hardly cloak and dagger stuff.
And some people just use their social pariah status to write books about conspiracies that don't exist, to make a fast buck. Wake up and smell the coffee
[addsig]
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Jahzel on Thu Jan 6th at 12:36am 2005
"There's no way Bush could become a Hitler-like dictator and hold power, considering the massive size of the US population and landmass, the wide variety of differing opinions and stances people hold, the lack of homogenity among the people, the incredible strength of the US economy, the number of guns owned by normal citizens, and the 50-50 split in the voting."
Yak, for this reason, the next agenda follows:
-
Weakening the US Dollar. eventually there will be an economic collapse to force the world into a global electronic currency.
-
Taking away the Constitution and the right to bare arms to protect yourselves and your families (already in the anti-terror proposals)
-
Using the Patriot Acts I & II and Homeland Security to arrest anyone who is a suspected terrorist, i.e. a threat to a global fascist dictatorship
-
Arresting anyone who frequently refers to the constitution (actually admitted)
-
Arresting ant-war/anti-bush protestors and sending them to 'compact cities', FEMA concentration camps that they already have set up for dissidence
-
Using Electronic Voting a means to manipulate voting figures. There has been a general outrage over voting fraud and it is a wonder the US didnt do exactly what the Ukarainians did.
All I'm asking you, and it's not much, is to read up on this stuff. Go to www.infowars.com, go to www.prisonplanet.com, listen to the interviews, watch the footage, read the documents, be informed, fight this New World Order and global tyranny, and never give up.
P.s. Your avatar states that you must know about George Orwell's 1984. Well just look at what he had to say back then! Look at today's world of 'terror threats; and surveillence! For god's sake, what we are facing today is ten times worse than 1984.
[addsig]Posted by Tracer Bullet on Thu Jan 6th at 12:41am 2005
...Let this be a warning to everybody; If you want to ignore the facts then prepare for a new Global Nazi Germany to emerge.
I don't quite see why you keep on ranting and raving about the U.S. if you don't live here. If I'm not mistaken, European countries have fewer civil liberties than we do, more police/government power, and much tougher gun laws. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that you are an American, and have just put your location as "UK" to throw of the globalists who might be dogging your heels. You don't write like a Brit, and that's a fact. But whatever, it doesn't matter.
I have been decrying your ignorance, but on second thought, I think I'm glad you don't know anything about science. I shudder to imagine my technical knowledge and imagination in the hands of someone so obviously ungrounded in reality.
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Cassius on Thu Jan 6th at 12:42am 2005
-
Taking away the Constitution and the right to bare arms to protect yourselves and your families (already in the anti-terror proposals)
-
Using the Patriot Acts I & II and Homeland Security to arrest anyone who is a suspected terrorist, i.e. a threat to a global fascist dictatorship
-
Arresting anyone who frequently refers to the constitution (actually admitted)
-
Arresting ant-war/anti-bush protestors and sending them to 'compact cities', FEMA concentration camps that they already have set up for dissidence
These ones are just ridiculous. Republicans do not want gun control. I won't even begin to speak about your Global Facist Dictatorship. When has Bush arrested anyone for referring frequently to the constitution? - and if he did, when did he admit to it? I have many friends and a few family members that have been in large anti-war protests, they have not been sent away to 'concentration camps;' nobody has.
You have frighteningly little conception of what life in the US is like.
[addsig]Posted by Jahzel on Thu Jan 6th at 12:54am 2005
Read for yourself about the removal of the 4th Amendment, read about Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants", read about the quiet monitering of anti-war protestors and new 'free speech zones'. I'm sure you and your family and friends may well have escaped detention, but soon the new laws will toughen up and anyone will be targeted by these vultures.
[addsig]Posted by Orpheus on Thu Jan 6th at 1:02am 2005
in the hands of someone so obviously ungrounded in reality.
speaking of which, i have been telling my wife, *holds index finger and thumb 4 inches apart* this is 6 inches for 23 years now. ![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Jahzel on Thu Jan 6th at 1:29am 2005
Go here and read the Globalists proposals:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/ (Project For A New American Century - PNAC)
Some interesting quotes that show that I'm not making this whole new world order thing up and that it has been the grand design of the future for years. P.s. Sorry for hoggin up the forum with this one:
[addsig]"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." --Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, in 1844.
"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."-- Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book "Tragedy and Hope".
"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." - Woodrow Wilson
"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most
significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions." -- Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994"David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it, and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and justanother day's work... In the world of David Rockefeller it's hard to tell where business ends and politics begins" . Bill Moyers
"We know in the not too distant future, a half dozen corporations are going to control the media. We took this step (merger) to ensure we were one of them"--Time Warner spokesperson.
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -- Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg ("Angel" to and active in the United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James' brother Max, banker to the German government - See the Siss?on Report
"All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER."--Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967.
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the
scenes."-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court."I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insideous forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
"For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from it's original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy making arm of the government." --
President Harry Truman"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."-- U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House.
"The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation."-- Mayor (1918-1925) John F. Hylan of New York.
"Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in." --Nebraska State Senator Peter Hoagland, speaking on radio in 1983.
"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of freedom to Americans..." "And so alot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the Housing Projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make the people feel safer in their communities"--President Bill Clinton 3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"
"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans.."--
Bill Clinton USA Today--3-11-93, page 2a"Gun registration is not enough"--Attorney Generral Janet Reno--12-10-93--Associated Press
"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal"--Janet Reno
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, then it will lose it's freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort and security that it values, it will lose that too. Unknown Americans must decide : Are we to be governed by Americans or by an International organization ? I, for one, owe no alliegence to the United Nations nor will I give it any. I obey only the U.S. Constitution. You had better think about this issue, for if the U.N. can violate the Sovereignty of Haiti, Iraq and other countries, it can violate ours...The United States may not be the top dog 15 years from now. U.N.
security council resolutions, backed by say chinese soldiers, could be aimed at us."-Charley Reese-Orlando Sentinel"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting
in June of 1991"From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."--Winston Churchill to
the London press in 1922."The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power--Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical."--U.S. Senator
Barry Goldwater from his 1964 book "No Apologies""I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election....It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"
--George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in1957."The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed
Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92."The Air Force is suffering from pilots who have lost faith in their generals, jet engines that still don't work after repairs and maintenance depots with 'little quality or quantity of work being produced', according to an internal Defense Department memorandum. The draft memo paints a troubling picture of the state of American air power. 'The sad state of air-force readiness can be blamed on the Clinton Administration, which treats the military as a toy to be deployed for meals-on-wheels-type missionswithout due consideration for it's impact on readiness", said Robert
Maginnis, a retired Army Lieutenent colonel and an analyst at the conservative Family Research Council"The International government of the United Nations, stripped of it's legal trimming, then, is really the International Government of the United States and the Soviet Union acting in Unison."
From the American Jewish Committee's official magazine "Commentary" of Nov. 1958, Pg. 376"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevidable. Today of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years...The Bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clentched fist."
Dimitry Z. Manuilsky in a speech made in 1931 before the Lenin School of Political Warfare.
(He became an officer of the U.N. Security Council in 1949)"We must realize that we cannot co-exist eternally. One of us must go to his grave. We do not want to go to the grave. They do not want to go to the grave, either. So what can be done? We must push them to their grave." -- Sewren Bailer, a polish communist leader, who defected to the west, charged that in April, 1955 Khrushchev said this to a group of Warsaw Communists.
"We operate here under directives which emulate (sic) from the White House ... The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union." -- Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, 1954.
"The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow." -- Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915"The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world." -- M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
"If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands." -- Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book "International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World"
(1931)"... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." -- H. G. Wells, in his book entitled "The New World Order" (1939)
"The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual." -- excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
"In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace.'" -- excerpt from article entitled "New World Order Pledged to Jews," in the New York Times (October 1940)
"If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order." -- The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of
North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states."New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor" --
title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)"Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis." -- text of article in the Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)
"The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God." --
American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in the New York Times (December 1942)"There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper." -- Norman Thomas, in his book "What Is Our Destiny" (1944)
"He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order." -- excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in the Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)
"The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'" -- Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- New York Times (February 1962)
"The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order." -- Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)
"He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order.'" -- excerpt from an article in the New York Times (February
1972)"If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and
pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
-- Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)"The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species." -- Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled "Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions," in the book "On the Creation of a Just World Order" (1975)
"My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order." -- Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)
"At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order." -- part of article in the New York Times (November 1975)
"A New World Order" -- title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)
"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -- Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)
"We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms." -- Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in the Washington Post (May 1991)
"We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period." -- Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." -- President George Bush (January 1991)
"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council." -- excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in the New York Times (January 1991)
"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." -- George McGovern, in the New York Times (February 1991)
"... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier." -- William Safire, in the New York Times (February 1991)
"How I Learned to Love the New World Order" -- article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in the Wall Street Journal (April 1992)
"How to Achieve The New World Order" -- title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)
"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." -- part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times (April 1994)
"New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State" -- title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in the Wall Street Journal (August 1994)
The "new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all." -- Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)
The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order." -- President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in the New York Times (April 1995)
"Alchemy for a New World Order" -- article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)
"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -- Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)
Posted by parakeet on Thu Jan 6th at 2:38am 2005
btw one of ur quotes dates back to the day my GRANDAD WAS BORN 1919!
[addsig]
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Thu Jan 6th at 2:42am 2005
I read about half of that, which I think is more than most people.
1.
Isolated quotes are a pretty stupid form of evidence. I could probably give you isolated quotes from all the same people that would categorically deny most of those positions. After all, they are politicians. Sadly, I'm not devoted enough to this discussion to go to the effort.2. Practically all of these have, obvious, distinctly non-sinister interpretations. And for those that seem truly whacked, I can easily write them off as either nutty people, or simply statements out of context. For instance, why is it odd that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno were rabid anti-gun agitators? They are liberals. get over it.
3. Why is a New World Order a bad thing? I suppose it would be if it were a truly a police state, but I don't think that will happen. Eventually there will be a planetary government, but it will come in the fullness of time, long after I am dead most likely. There are many changes that will need to occur before that can happen, such as the global equalization of living standards etc.
I don't even know why I'm bothering to continue this "conversation"
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on Thu Jan 6th at 2:51am 2005
As for this "New World Order" business: Yes, there is a new world order. We're in a changing time, and the world will not be as it is now in 10, 15, 20 years. Just as it is now far different from what it was in the 60s, 70s, 80s, etc. etc. But a few dozen quotes with the phrase "new world order" in it isn't proof of any grand master scheme - hardly any view of what this new world order is/will be matches! You've got political, economic, corporate, religious, many of which conflict with each other. Hell, to the quotes from the 40s and 1800s, we are the new world order in this far, distant, and unpredictable future.
I know this is going to sound funny and outright stupid, but if any of you have Knights of the Old Republic, go have a listen to Jolee's ramblings on things. There's some wisdom there, despite it being just another scripted line in a video game. I'll have to see if I can dig up the line. [addsig]
KungFuSquirrel
member
751 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Austin TX

Occupation: Game Design, LightBox Interactive
Posted by parakeet on Thu Jan 6th at 2:52am 2005
[addsig]
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Jan 6th at 2:55am 2005
because you suffer from the same affliction i do. you cannot tolerate miscommunication of any type, especially when the other party is so far off base.
i am not saying whom is right in this instance, but the sides are very distinct in how the topic is viewed by each member.
you, like me, cannot end by just walking away. it stinks of cowardice, or worse.
in my case, the more someone insists i am being an asshole, the more motivated i am, because to me it indicates they have no clue as to the truth of the matter. i have met real assholes and i am but a shadow compared. the more the other person insists, the more wrong they become.
anywho's.. thats my take on why people continue, when all reason says "whats the use?"
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Thu Jan 6th at 3:39am 2005
Yeah maybe that's it...
| ? posted by Orpheus |
|
? quote:
in the hands of someone so obviously ungrounded in reality. speaking of which, i have been telling my wife, *holds index finger and thumb 4 inches apart* this is 6 inches for 23 years now. |
This had me in stitches by the way![]()
Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0279 seconds.

