Posted by Foxpup on Sun Jan 16th at 12:33am 2005
Foxpup
member
380 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 26th 2004
Location: the Land of Oz

Occupation: Student
Posted by Crono on Sun Jan 16th at 1:16am 2005
And yet they didn't write it.
XC, don't bother. They wont listen. Believe me, I've tried.
[addsig]
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 2:15am 2005
Posted by Foxpup on Sun Jan 16th at 2:45am 2005
/ Picks up phone. Calls local mathematician.
My friend here says Microsoft should have failed around around 10 years ago, shortly the release of something called "Windows 2.0". He says according to supply-demand theory, Microsoft should not have been able to sell enough copies to justify their expense. But, sell enough they did. Damn Microsoft, defying the laws of mathematics... [addsig]
Foxpup
member
380 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 26th 2004
Location: the Land of Oz

Occupation: Student
Posted by Myrk- on Sun Jan 16th at 3:08am 2005
Well it's not a direct hardware issue... Most likely something to do with your firewalls etc and uninstalling them. But as usual people are fewls... Windows has its own firewall which you can turn on- with or without Service Pack 2. SP2 just makes a spinkee interface which annoys you more.
And Foxpup, compare Windows XP to 98... It is a LOT better. My PC never crashes- with 98 it used to crash all the time, and with ME- it was just 1 big crash with some nice graphics. As for selling well... the competition ain't so good or user friendly (Linux is ugly and incompatible, always needs patches which is why the normal user can't use it).
[addsig]Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 4:58am 2005
Posted by wil5on on Sun Jan 16th at 5:27am 2005
Neither you, nor your *friend*, seem to know what youre talking about. Microsoft products have worked fine for me, they should work fine for anyone who knows what theyre doing. I know I've got no chance of changing your views, but please, just stop making MS-bashing posts for the sake of MS-bashing.
[addsig]wil5on
member
1733 posts
323 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2003
Location: Adelaide

Occupation: Mapper
Posted by Crono on Sun Jan 16th at 5:33am 2005
[addsig]
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 5:45am 2005
Posted by Gorbachev on Sun Jan 16th at 7:15am 2005
[addsig]
Posted by Crono on Sun Jan 16th at 7:41am 2005
You're not the only person on this site who knows about "alternatives" and how to use them.
I really don't care how much you know, you shouldn't act that way to other individuals on this matter. Because, honestly, there's nothing you can do.
Also, for the last f**king time, Microsoft did not "develop" Dos, they bought it.
[addsig]
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Jan 16th at 7:47am 2005
makes me wonder, what am i doing so right?
i never get anything, i didn't deserve to get by visiting questionable sites or otherwise drawing attention to my pc.
my computers stay on 24/7 all connected to DSL, and they hum along day after day after month etc.etc.
am i so lucky as to have the only pirated copy of XP pro corp that no one wants to mess with me?
anywho's... i know that windows is buggy, but its no where near as bad as the doom sayers want it to be..
[addsig]Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 8:46am 2005
And in rssponse to Orpheus's post:
"questionable sites", lol. I didn't even have any browsers open. Literally, it downloaded the virus on connect. And this was with the Window$ firewall and Zone Alarm Pro running, plus Norton Corporate Anti-Virus, all upto date. It detected the virus, but didn't do anything about it, maybe Symantec can take blame for security issues, but that's not the point. I have run Micro$oft software for years and have had nothing but trouble in most cases, shows you their programming skills doesnt it? Window$ is at least usable if you can put up with some bugs, but when you compare it to Linux releases, for example, Debian 3.0 has only a couple of bugs, the testing version contains 100's, but is still usable. Now, Microsoft release their products before all of their bugs have been eliminated, and then release service packs months overdue. Great service huh? Whereas, Linux releases don't have to be updated if you don't want to, the only update needed is for drivers and the kernel. The kernel only needs to be upgraded when new hardware is released, or there is a security hole (which will rarely appear). Much better system, since you don't have to go through a very slow server, you can choose between servers and find the fastest one.
Oh, and overall, thankyou for being a friendly community! Very friendly, in fact, you need an award! Huzzah!
Posted by Gorbachev on Sun Jan 16th at 9:46am 2005
Microsoft has to release by some date, if they don't nothing would ever get done, it's a continual loop. If you know enough about OSes you'd realize that. They run on a different operating model than open sources do, they have to. They also have to account for all the generic and general uses that people want computers to do...and while you may find it fun to look on development sites and find drivers individually for your stuff there are many people without the experience, nor may ever have the technical skill to do anything more than plug the box in. As well, anyone into gaming can have lots of support and the majority of games are specific for Windows based machines so that removes a lot of potential users.
Linux has nowhere near as many lines of code in its OS as Windows does, and that's for the sole reason of reverse and automatic compatability. Obviously I know that it's not perfect, but to say that Windows hasn't steadily improved through its revisions is childish. If Linux coders make 40 Million lines of code with less bugs than Microsoft has then I'll believe their "skills" are better. But the best coders are snapped up by Microsoft, they're only limited by the consumer, business model and real-world stress-testing.
[addsig]
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 10:07am 2005
Posted by Crono on Sun Jan 16th at 10:08am 2005
m0p, in your two posts before your last one, yes, yes
you were a pompous prick.
I'm not arguing that Windows isn't
utter crap when it comes to development (or period). I'm talking
about the manner you're treating individuals in regard to the subject
(which was/is hostile and arrogant, just to let you know). It isn't
okay.
Gorb, MS doesn't snatch up the best programmers in the
field. They most often pick up CS-Semi-drop-outs. It's the only
explanation. That and they ask ridiculous questions at interviews.
They're suppose to test your problem solving skills, but one of them
is, ?How do they get the 'm' on m&m candy??
If my ?systems? instructor saw a
student's code which was sloppy (most of the students, sadly
)
she'd correct you and such, but there were always certain people that
just argued to the death and she'd always say something along the
lines of, ?Fine, quit now and go work at Microsoft? ... I always
thought it was funny.
Posted by m0p on Sun Jan 16th at 10:21am 2005
Posted by Gorbachev on Sun Jan 16th at 10:24am 2005
[addsig]
Posted by xconspirisist on Sun Jan 16th at 10:38am 2005
Microsoft has some of the best programmers in the world. The windows xp codebase is utterly vast, drawing in thousands of software shops from all round the world, or, mostly from our friends in India. The point is - at least from my prespective; is that windows surves its purpose. Home users, gamers, Parents and Small Children that dont actually care *how the computer works*, fit into this catagory. However, the well informed geek, will use linux, or other opperating systems. Simply because windows does not surve its purpose for them. For me, at least, I just wanted to try something new one day. After many hours of sheer delight from a whole load of problems to fix, I figured that free, and opensource software made by decent people, on a platform that is infinatly expandable, was the right choice for me.
xconspirisist
member
307 posts
61 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 26th 2003
Location: UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Myrk- on Sun Jan 16th at 12:24pm 2005
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.16 seconds.


