Posted by Leperous on Thu Jan 27th at 5:46pm 2005
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by satchmo on Thu Jan 27th at 6:56pm 2005
Bill is a rich and unpopular man, but he's still making a positive difference in the world.
[addsig]
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Posted by cloudsofthought on Fri Jan 28th at 5:27am 2005
That's a incredibly disgusting argument, but unfortunately not uncommon at all in today's left. I'd like to see you find a single Iraqi who didn't profit in some way from Saddam say: "Yes, I wish Saddam was in power -- that I was afraid to speak freely in the open, and the professional rapists were still being paid, etc. -- I want all that back. I wish I didn't have the chance to freely elect a representative government in two days. The Euro and American leftist are correct, Saddam should be in power."
[Edit: Also, the Baath regime killed hundreds of thousands - and counting (still uncovering mass graves also). If you want you can site some guesstimate of the Iraqi civilian death toll, but the reality is no where near hundreds of thousands.]
On capitalism. If it weren't for capitalism, you would not be communicating right now on the internet. You would not have the medicines and technologies which have saved millions, or many other things most of us take for granted. Capitalism = Growth, Freedoms, progress. Socialism = Stagnation, despotism. Again and again history demonstrates this, yet modern leftist continue to cling to their utopian ideals despite (sometimes in spite of) reality.
(Don't take this as a flame, I'm simply expressing my contrary opinion.)
Posted by DrGlass on Fri Jan 28th at 11:55am 2005
That's a incredibly disgusting argument, but unfortunately not uncommon at all in today's left. I'd like to see you find a single Iraqi who didn't profit in some way from Saddam say: "Yes, I wish Saddam was in power -- that I was afraid to speak freely in the open, and the professional rapists were still being paid, etc. -- I want all that back. I wish I didn't have the chance to freely elect a representative government in two days. The Euro and American leftist are correct, Saddam should be in power."
[Edit: Also, the Baath regime killed hundreds of thousands - and counting (still uncovering mass graves also). If you want you can site some guesstimate of the Iraqi civilian death toll, but the reality is no where near hundreds of thousands.]
On capitalism. If it weren't for capitalism, you would not be communicating right now on the internet. You would not have the medicines and technologies which have saved millions, or many other things most of us take for granted. Capitalism = Growth, Freedoms, progress. Socialism = Stagnation, despotism. Again and again history demonstrates this, yet modern leftist continue to cling to their utopian ideals despite (sometimes in spite of) reality.
(Don't take this as a flame, I'm simply expressing my contrary opinion.)
Not to generlize or anything.
[addsig]
DrGlass
member
1825 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: USA
Occupation: 2D/3D digital artist
Posted by xconspirisist on Fri Jan 28th at 2:16pm 2005
To him, comparitivly $1 billion is just our ?3 a month that common plebs might give. He is still a selfish arse.
[addsig]xconspirisist
member
307 posts
61 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 26th 2003
Location: UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by satchmo on Fri Jan 28th at 4:28pm 2005
You can say that the amount isn't much realtive to his total wealth, but it's still money that he can spend and get tons of enjoyment out of it. It's not like everything will cost him thousands of times more than everyone else.
[addsig]
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Posted by cloudsofthought on Fri Jan 28th at 5:43pm 2005
I guess you're refering to when I refer to the left. Yes, obviously that in itself is a generalization, but that doesn't mean it's not true. A generalization is not false simply by virtue of being a generalization. They can be unfair, and you apparently think this is such a case, but it can also equally be accurate. If I'm being unfair tell me how.
Posted by Leperous on Fri Jan 28th at 6:27pm 2005
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by sniky44 on Fri Jan 28th at 7:53pm 2005
[addsig]
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0147 seconds.

