as for the neutral countries, i wasn't alive in WW2, despite what you all may think about my advanced years. it was my understanding that those countries did not chose to be neutral, they opted for neutrality in favor of getting the s**t beat out of them. i have seen similar instances in cases like muggings. people chose to not act, in favor of not getting shot by the mugger.
may not be a fair representation, but it is accurate enough.
i do not think inaction is reason enough. sorry.
no offense intended of course.
This may have been true for some countries, but I think Switzerland truly was neutral out of principal rather than fear. The Swiss used to export the most feared mercenary armies in the world, until they were banned from doing so by international treaty. I think the Vatican is the only "country" that still employs them. I don't think anyone would want to attack the Swiss if only for purely historical reasons. Plus there is that mandatory military service thing (I think) so every man in the country has military training.
Switzerland doesn't get attacked for one simple reason: You don't attack where you keep your money. In a two-sided conflict, Switzerland found the third option was profit.


[addsig]
