very 21st century.
Screw morality, let's get to the bottom of peoples' dislike for homosexuals: we, having been brought up with a more or less clear picture of what men should be like, react with disgust when we see deviation from that pattern - or, even worse, dissent against it. I'm not saying it's wrong to have that kind of reaction - for example, I don't have a problem with homosexuals as people, of course, but to me, more 'flamboyant' expressions of homosexuality are not the most pleasant sight. Hell, when reading that description of men walking into battles with their gay lovers, I winced a little. It's a fairly normal reaction, I think, if only because that's how we're raised, but one we have to see past in order to treat people how they deserve to be treated - as our equals. I also think that it is more than wrong to construe that kind of reaction as somehow logical, and to dignify it with the title of 'morality.' You wouldn't say that it's wrong to oppose racism because a lot of people were deeply, morally racist for much of human history, no matter how they adopted their opinions - no matter if they were "raised, taught, or indoctrinated" to believe them.
There are a few gays at my school, and there's no more wrong with them than there is with anybody. It might upset me if I saw them going at it, sure, but that's just because of the culture I was raised in.
And yes, "homophobia" is a terrible misnomer. I got a "bad rap," as it were, at my school after publicly saying, during an assembly on bullying, these words: "Saying 'oh my God' doesn't make you religious; saying 'that's gay' doesn't make you homophobic." It's pretty ridiculous and petty to belittle your opposition not by logical argument, but to claim they're just afraid of you on the inside.




