lamda
Post Reply
Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Apr 14th at 9:16am 2005


Monkee.. I swear to you it was 100% coincidence. At the time this show was on. I was thinking, "what a coincidence, we have a thread marginally similar". I could have just as easily posted those stats in my thread about parenting, since it had a few replies concerning "teens" but reconsidered cause I just happen to click on this topic first.

You know me, I have been a prude about this topic for ages, but.. I have not gone out of my way to be evil about it. I do have a modicum of manners, at least I have enough not to totally disrupt the entire forum. This topic could very easily degenerate into such.

On a more serious note. My thinking was truly about the first two stats. I cannot help thinking " Poor rich people, they have not been taught to deal with life's many hardships and resorting to suicide is their only option" and " You would think, with the rise of the acceptance of personal anger issues that homicides would far outstrip suicides"

In each of those two, I was genuinely shocked when the guy mentioned the stat. The third? well, it was neither a shock nor a surprise TBH, but he said it all in one breath so I included it verbatim as he said it for accuracy.

My goal was not to "win" or "prove" a point, but to just post an incidental. You and I are always gonna be on opposite sides of this, but I do feel that we do not have to be hostile about it. I do try to be........ well I try to be sympathetic to your feelings. At least as much as I am able and still express myself honestly.

[edit] stupid link timed out. smiley this is the program I was watching.

Death Detectives: The L.A. County Coroner Special

Color, English

Cameras record a typical week in the Los Angeles County medical examiner's office.

A&E [118]
April 13: 8:00PM
April 14: 12:00AM

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Spartan on Thu Apr 14th at 10:13am 2005


? quoting Cassius
They're not flaunting s**t, and if they are, that's their choice. Again, see past your disgust and see them as equals.

Read my post again dilhole. I'm not disgusted by it I just don't care whether they are gay or not. I get tired of the constant flaunting of it which some of them do do a lot. I've seen many many gay people and they are not all like this but like I said some of them are.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by KoRnFlakes on Thu Apr 14th at 11:23am 2005


? quote:
Yeah, did you know that Achilles from the Iliad (made into a movie last year "Troy") is suppose to be gay? Freaking Hollywood had to change the story because of the retarded homophobics in the U.S.


sad.
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Apr 14th at 11:29am 2005


? quoting KoRnFlakes

? quote:
Yeah, did you know that Achilles from the Iliad (made into a movie last year "Troy") is suppose to be gay? Freaking Hollywood had to change the story because of the retarded homophobics in the U.S.



sad.

the proper term is "was".. was supposed to be gay, and its not sad, its proper thinking. why would anyone deliberately portray someone in that light without irrefutable proof?

if i were to make a movie about a legend, i would try to stick to the pertinent facts, not something that has no real way to prove. besides, it is my understanding that homosexuality was not considered "as wrong" back then as it is now, so it wouldn't be to difficult to prove. and since its still more/less unproven.. its more than likely false.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Leperous on Thu Apr 14th at 11:57am 2005


Given that the Iliad doesn't say Achilles was gay (it was later works that elaborated on the story that pointed this out) and more to the point, he's a fictional character, what does it matter?!



Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by fishy on Thu Apr 14th at 12:42pm 2005


? quoting satchmo

? quote:
but i am against people being treated unfairly

Therefore you must support gay marriage. They deserve the same recognition and privilege that the rest of the society takes for granted.

i don't follow your reasoning. why must i support the erosion of thousands of years of spiritual teachings?

i could use my golfing analogy, but......

? quoting Cassius
that's the strangest, most indecipherable metaphor I have ever seen written anywhere at any place or time in my life, including in poetry

i thought your choice was just as odd, which seemed to be saying it was perfectly valid to challenge values that have been in place for much of human history. i don't disagree with that, but it's just that the thread seemed to be saying that much of human history, from the greatest philosophers to the mightiest armies, have at least accepted, if not embraced, homosexuallity.

we can only judge others by our own standards, and by my standards, homosexuallity is an abhorrent concept. heh, /me bad. now i can't, and wont apologize for that, because it's true, that's how i feel. i'm also fully aware that there are plenty of gay men an women that feel the exact same way about hetro sex. so to be fair, i wouldn't label them as 'scared of the beard hetrophobes' rather than gays, and want an apology or change of attitude from them.

i also think that hanging a dead cow upside down on a hook for the slaughterman to cut it's throat and drain its blood is pretty abhorrent, but i still love a nice burger.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Leperous on Thu Apr 14th at 2:04pm 2005


? quoting fishy
we can only judge others by our own standards, and by my standards, homosexuallity is an abhorent concept. heh, /me bad. now i can't, and wont apologize for that, because it's true, that's how i feel. i'm also fully aware that there are plenty of gay men an women that feel the exact same way about hetro sex. so to be fair, i wouldn't label them as 'scared of the beard hetrophobes' rather than gays, and want an apology or change of attitude from them.

I used to feel the same way, until I met seveeral gay people at University, where I realised that they're usually normal, decent people, unless anti-gay views have made them stay in the closest and affected their confidence and social skils. They can't help the way they feel any more than you can help being straight- many of them do lead a hetero life at some point, but find that it just doesn't work out- and could you force yourself to change your sexuality? It shouldn't really be viewed as any more abhorrent than someone with a genetic disfiguring disorder, or a missing limb, or behavioural problems from a bad upbringing - yes it's different from the norm, but it's not their fault or anything they can do anything about, and it's not going to hurt anyone in any way.

With regards to marriage, who cares? I'm not Christian and I don't think many people here are, so what's the problem with the state viewing them as a couple and allowing them to define property, wills etc. easier? Worried about which one you called Mr or Mrs, are we? Yes, any children they have need to have influences from both sexes in their life, but unless they're shipped off to some single-sex-island they'll get that in their life, somehow. Besides, hetero couples still manage to churn out homo children!

/says a rampant heterosexual male who's managed to get over his homophobia!

/not meant to be a dig at anyone in particular, especialy fishy

PS now camp people, gay or not, realllly piss me off... damn them and their chihuahuas and mincing about!





Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by fishy on Thu Apr 14th at 2:46pm 2005


? quoting Leperous

? quoting fishy
we can only judge others by our own standards, and by my standards, homosexuallity is an abhorrent concept. heh, /me bad. now i can't, and wont apologize for that, because it's true, that's how i feel. i'm also fully aware that there are plenty of gay men an women that feel the exact same way about hetro sex. so to be fair, i wouldn't label them as 'scared of the beard hetrophobes' rather than gays, and want an apology or change of attitude from them.

I used to feel the same way, until I met seveeral gay people at University, where I realised that they're usually normal, decent people

i know it wasn't a dig, and nothing i've seen or posted here has been. but i can't help but get the feeling that i'm being misunderstood a little. just because i think that the defining act of [male]homosexuallity is something abhorrent, doesn't mean i think there is something abnormal or indecent about people who don't. each to their own, horses for courses etc. but none for me, thanks very much.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by RayMad on Fri Apr 15th at 7:59pm 2005


Okay, here's the pictures..

"Blub?" you say..

The sentence "B?sser og Lesbiske p? Fyn" means "FAggots & Lesbians at Fyn*"

*Danish island.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Natus on Fri Apr 15th at 8:06pm 2005


wee we got translations...and pictures, raymad is such a good photographer :/
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by RayMad on Fri Apr 15th at 8:09pm 2005


Yeah, the pictures fit together perfectly..

And look at the colors at that sign, god damn smiley

I'm like, so ph0t0gr4f0r.

[addsig]



Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Cassius on Sat Apr 16th at 1:01am 2005


Your avatar scares me.

...

...

</irony>





Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sat Apr 16th at 2:11am 2005


? quote:
could you force yourself to change your sexuality?

Imagine if most of us are homosexuals and the heterosexuals are the minorities (please don't point out the biological paradox; it's a theoretical arguement), how would the anti-gay people feel then (presumably they are heterosexuals)?

In turn, they would be the ones who are discriminated against and labeled "sinners". To me, it's just as wrong as racism, except being a racist is really not socially acceptable nowadays.

Just wait twenty years, then all you bigots would be damned as what you really are--bigots.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 2:51am 2005


? quoting satchmo

Just wait twenty years, then all you bigots would be damned as what you really are--bigots.

Careful how you brand us "bigots". we are for the most part not willing to wait 20 years and would settle for "asshole" by throttling people who call us names.

This bigot, would be in the forefront, and doing a s**t load of throttling to be sure :/

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sat Apr 16th at 2:56am 2005


? quote:
throttling people who call us names

Nah, that job is taken. Those Klans members would be glad to accomplish any mob justice for you.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 3:01am 2005


? quoting satchmo

? quote:
throttling people who call us names

Nah, that job is taken. Those Klans members would be glad to accomplish any mob justice for you.

yeah well, the only thing worse than a homophobe, is a homophobe-phobe..

think on that a while.. now this bigots off to bed, before he goes and says something he regrets.. and you know me, i never regret anything i say so you can rest assured... it would be a whopper.

nite/nite all.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Nickelplate on Sat Apr 16th at 5:34am 2005


? quoting satchmo

Just wait twenty years, then all you bigots would be damned as what you really are--bigots.

In 20 years everything will be so "Politically Correct," that if you claim that someone is a 'bigot' they will instanly be tried by a number of methods that can be read in the book: "The Salem Witch Trials."

Man, Political correctness sucks dog bollocks. It's not just PC though, it's this whole thing where NOTHING IS WRONG with anyone anymore, we just gotta accept them as they are.

Satchmo, in your job you came across a fat boy and told his parents that he shouldn'e be so fat, and they became defensive and completely irrational when they told you that it was none of your business and that he is just fine.

That is what you sound like now, only a slightly milder version. Yes, Racism is wrong, but i have a RIGHt not to like other races (i DO like other races), just like i have a RIGHT to think that homosexuality is wrong. (i DO think its wrong)

It's not bigotry, it's morals and values. Which is something America forgot a LONG time ago.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by fishy on Sat Apr 16th at 6:12am 2005


so does this band of bigots get to include the gays that think hetro sex is abhorrent? if it doesn't, i want to know why not. what have you got against them that would have them excluded? or are you a different kind of bigot? [addsig]



Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 9:57am 2005


Main Entry: big?ot
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices
- big?ot?ed /-g&-t&d/ adjective
- big?ot?ed?ly adverb

Main Entry: ob?sti?nate
Pronunciation: '?b-st&-n&t
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin obstinatus, past participle of obstinare to be resolved, from ob- in the way + -stinare (akin to stare to stand)
1 : perversely adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion
2 : not easily subdued, remedied, or removed <obstinate fever>
- ob?sti?nate?ly adverb
- ob?sti?nate?ness noun
Main Entry: in?tol?er?ant
Pronunciation: -r&nt
Function: adjective
1 : unable or unwilling to endure
2 a : unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters b : unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights : BIGOTED
- in?tol?er?ant?ly adverb
- in?tol?er?ant?ness noun
synonyms OBSTINATE, DOGGED, STUBBORN, PERTINACIOUS, MULISH mean fixed and unyielding in course or purpose. OBSTINATE implies usually an unreasonable persistence <an obstinate proponent of conspiracy theories>. DOGGED suggests an admirable often tenacious and unwavering persistence <pursued the story with dogged perseverance>. STUBBORN implies sturdiness in resisting change which may or may not be admirable <a person too stubborn to admit error>. PERTINACIOUS suggests an annoying or irksome persistence <a pertinacious salesclerk refusing to take no for an answer>. MULISH implies a thoroughly unreasonable obstinacy <a mulish determination to have his own way>.

2 entries found for prejudice.
To select an entry, click on it.
prejudice[1,noun]prejudice[2,transitive verb]

Main Entry: 1prej?u?dice
Pronunciation: 'pre-j&-d&s
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French, from Latin praejudicium previous judgment, damage, from prae- + judicium judgment -- more at JUDICIAL
1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics
synonym see PREDILECTION

I see nothing contained within this that applies to this discussion and am of the opinion that it was only interjected to be hateful and/or mean. its insertion only disrupted the otherwise mature flow of the thread. it assumes that they are correct and we are wrong. this discussion has not proven one or the other is correct. in fact, i think its rather bigoted to not like millions of people whom find homosexuality wrong.

*shrugs*

perhaps its only me though.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by DrGlass on Sat Apr 16th at 10:28am 2005


I have no problem with gays. I have no problem with people who have a moral (more to the point, religouis) problems with homosexuals.

If a person dosn't like gays, if a person hates gays, that is their choice and their personal opinion. It is everyone's right to have their own views. The problem is that people take their veiws and try to turn them into policie... Gay marrige, what is so wrong with letting two people get married and hold marrige status under the government? Key word: government. If a chruch dosn't accept the gay way of life, I'm sure they can turn them down. But the government shouldn't turn any citizen away. It is wrong to draw a line and say "you can not have the same rights as these people becuase of your life style" and that is what is being said.

A marrige dosn't have to be religious at all, a judge can wed two people, why should we draw a distinction between gay and strait? How is that fair, or just?

People should keep their views on a personal level, we should respect the views of a racist or homophobe just as they should respect the views of a homosexual. As should they respect the 'god given' rights of all people, not to mention the rights issued to all citizens.
[addsig]





Post Reply