lamda
Post Reply
Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 10:41am 2005


there is one escapable truth to all this. if people do something wrong long enough, it becomes not wrong.

think on that a while.

now, if gays are permitted to marry, it will ostensibly admit that homosexuality is no longer wrong, and the government seems unwilling to take that step. it is my opinion that the issue has not been proven yet, so the stance of not permitting gay marriage is justified.

assuming now that homosexuality is a born trait and not a taught one as i believe, people are born with abhorrent traits all the time and are taught to overcome them. or they are supposed to be.

i think that if we are gonna talk about events that may occur 20 years from now, lets talk about the cure that they will eventually create for this condition. most gay people claim that they are born this way, if so, its got to be as curable as any other birth defect. if for no other reason that its prevent-ability by determining at what stage a male fails to become fully male (and vice versa for females)

if its environmentally driven as i so firmly believe, then perhaps in 20 years it wont be so vogue to be a fag anymore.. that sounds harsh, but its essentially how it is. it OK to be GAY.. and that is the basic reason its not OK..

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by fishy on Sat Apr 16th at 11:29am 2005


you know, there's plenty of 'hetrosexual activities' that i find equally disturbing, so i suppose i must be really f**ked up.

on a side note of fickle flaming, only a fool could come to the conclusion that i'm a bigot by what i've said here. but then again, docs are world famous for knowing better, therefor negating the need to actually listen to what anyone else is saying.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sat Apr 16th at 3:45pm 2005


? quote:
people are born with abhorrent traits all the time and are taught to overcome them. or they are supposed to be.


For example, people who are born of African descent are suppose to overcome racial hatred. So we shouldn't really blame those people who are racist, we should just blame the blacks who cannot act like white people.

I cannot understand why people believe that homosexuals prefer to choose their sexual orientation. Do you have any idea how much pain and suffering they have to go through because of it? Does anyone choose to be born with no legs? Does anyone prefer to be born with blindness or mental retardation?

I don't have problem with people holding their views, but they're the ones who are preventing homosexuals from having civil and social rights--i.e. not being able to marry.

If you guys keep your views to yourself and don't stand in the ways of others, I have no issue against you. But that's obviously not the case. You are depriving these people their natural born rights, in my opinion.

I just got my marriage license yesterday morning, and no one gave me any hassle because I am straight. Can you imagine if you're gay?

If homosexuality is taught, not born, then why does it go across culture and time (it's reported in ancient China and ancient Greece). It has been there for thousands of years, and in any continent wherever there are human beings. Do you still believe it's a learned behavior?

That's okay. Time will enlighten you guys. I'll save my gloating for the future.
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 4:21pm 2005


racism is form of prejudiced, prejudism is not racism.. you are comparing apples to oranges satch.

bottomline on this, as far as i am concerned.. the topic is moot now, and i refuse to discuss it further for the simple fact that some people are even more close minded about pro-homo, than anyone who ever lived is about anti-homo.

people like you satch are just to convinced that you are correct and cannot see the forest for the trees. people may not chose to be born homosexual, but they damned sure chose to act on the animal urges they have when they find out. i get so tired of people telling me that they cannot help themselves.. the same tired excuse is used for post partum, pedophilia,alcoholism, and a whole s**tload of other mental illnesses. denial is an evil thing, and anyone whom thinks that homosexuality does not originate in the brain is a fool. and since it does originate from that location, and it is a defect, it can be aligned with all those other illnesses without biased, or prejudiced intent.

i still firmly believe it is a taught thing, i will never waver from that viewpoint, but assuming i am mistaken and it is a born trait, it has got to be FIXABLE!.. i assume that someone in the world believes that and that someday some one will discover exactly where the event occurs and fixes it in the womb.

being pro-homo is not a bad thing, being anal about it is. and people whom go to the other end of the spectrum in their support are just as wrong as the people you say you dislike..

all i can say is, "welcome to my world, cause now YOU ARE THE BAD GUY TOO!"

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sat Apr 16th at 5:40pm 2005


? quote:
it has got to be FIXABLE!


Michael Jackson was born black, and he sure tried to fix this by submitting himself to a multitude of cosmetic surgeries.

Why do we have to "fix" homosexuals? Being an alcoholic and a pedophile hurt other people. When was the last time you were hurt by a homosexual? Have they ever infringed on your lifestyle because of their choice? Why do you hate them so?

It's common human decency to respect other people's lifestyle. I am not asking you to change your mind, but I am simply asking you to accept other people's choices. You don't have to become a homosexual to support their freedom of choice. I have an open mind, that's why I allow myself to see everyone as equal. Apparently, you think they have a diseased mind and need to have drastic medical intervention simply because they think differently from you.

And if I become a bad guy being anal about supporting human rights, so be it. The world is a cruel place, and someone has to stand up to do the right thing, even if it's unpopular. I see myself as an abolitionist. They sure weren't very popular at the turn of the century.
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 5:44pm 2005


thus the saga ends..

/ me bows out, you cannot converse with such closed minds.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sat Apr 16th at 8:00pm 2005


? quote:
/Me tactfully avoids commenting. See, I am not always a prick


You see, who's the prick?
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 8:09pm 2005


*sighs*

if i avoid a thread i am passionate about, i feel discriminated against. If i comment within a thread i am passionate about, but happen to be in the minority, i feel discriminated against.

so lets see here, am i the prick because i opted to express myself, in spite of it being in a poor light, or am i a prick because i could have kept my ill received opinions to myself?

sometimes i kick myself in the ass for not opting to just shut up. you cannot argue with close minded people and i am stupid enough to never learn that sad fact.

so i guess, its me who is the prick. i should have told you what you wanted to hear.

just once i would like to have a discussion where the other side can see both view points as clearly as i do :/

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by DrGlass on Sat Apr 16th at 9:30pm 2005


Orph, how can you say that the government should not allow gays to mary becuase homosexaulity is wrong when there are people on the other side of the issue who think homosexuality is right.

Why should the government take your fundimental side, when the government should be blind to religious and fundimental ideals. The bottom line in my mind is that the government should allow the same rights to anyone and everyone.

This is something that if going to happen. homosexuality wont go away, its been around since sexuality has been around. Restricting the rights of gays wont "fix" them.

What if it dose turn out that there is an enzym in the brain that triggers homosexuality? If 'they' come out with a drug to stop the production of that emzym you arn't fixing anything, your changing the person for their natural state (some would say as god made them).

If it turns out that a person's enviroment 'turns' them gay, that just proves that humans have the capasity to be homosexual. As we have the capsity to kill, make love, do drugs, etc. As long as one person's veiws or life style dosn't hurt anyone, no one should have the right to tell them its wrong and they cant do it.

Veiwing homosexuality as evil is your choise, and your choise should be respected. wanting to change other people to fit into your views of good and evil, that isn't respectable.


[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sat Apr 16th at 9:49pm 2005


? quoting DrGlass
Orph, how can you say that the government should not allow gays to mary becuase homosexaulity is wrong when there are people on the other side of the issue who think homosexuality is right.


tell me straight up, have you ever met anyone who said homosexuality was right? i mean said exactly those words. "homosexuality is right"

i have met people who accept it, i have met people who tolerate it, i have met people whom do not care one way or another to have an opinion, but i have never ever met anyone who said its "right"

given that it is accepted by a vast percentage does not make it right. furthermore, given that it is unaccepted by an even larger majority does not necessarily make it wrong either. my point in all this is, just because it is not wrong to some, does not make it right by any definition of the word "right"

i can tell you this honestly, homosexuality is for the most part ONLY tolerated.. no one anywhere in the world looks at their new born children and hopes they are gay, not even gay parents.

people whom think that they are accepted are in denial about their true position in the world.. people weigh the options and decide "what should i do about it" ... in a perfect setting, the person decides that they love, or care for the person more than they are offended by them and the acceptance comes in where they accept their decision to tolerate the action/situation.

in a less perfect situation, the person decides that the pro's and con's balance out and they keep associating with the gay person.

in a situation like mine, if my loved one decides its time to be gay, they are on their own.. period. no discussing it, now nothing. they know in advance, that their decision did not involve me when they made it, it should not involve me afterward either. this may not prevent the situation from occurring, but then again it may.

bottom line, i want you to tell me exactly, you heard the words, "its right"

BTW, you really,really need a spell checker. :P

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by fishy on Sun Apr 17th at 12:22am 2005


i didn't say it was right. i didn't say it was wrong. but i still got branded a bigot.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by satchmo on Sun Apr 17th at 12:29am 2005


? quote:
but i still got branded a bigot

I should've quoted back then. I wasn't calling you a bigot. I did read your post carefully, and you're rather reasonable.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Apr 17th at 12:30am 2005


? quoting fishy
i didn't say it was right. i didn't say it was wrong. but i still got branded a bigot.

uhh, was that your quote that got so... assaulted?

perhaps i should have waited for you to defend it.. i seem to have blown it completely.

/me apologizes for assuming i could. smiley

i get the impression that i am somewhere between hell and a bad place right now :/

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Cassius on Sun Apr 17th at 12:56am 2005


I once got told by a teacher that everyone is racist because we subliminally judge people differently based on their race - i.e., if we saw two huge black guys walking behind us, we'd be more inclined to cross the street than if they were white. Unfortunately, the example is, in many cases, true, but the conclusion, I told her, is bulls**t - prejudice is making the concious decision to think worse of someone based on the way they've chosen to live their lives, unless that way seriously interferes with your own.

The point? - no, I don't feel "rosy" inside to see homosexuals displaying their affections. Simply because I was raised to think homosexuality is evil, I, against logic, have a knee-jerk averse reaction to the sight. But that's not prejudice, because I can't help that I feel that way; it would be prejudiced were I unable to see past it and recognize that homosexuals, as people, have just as much a right to love someone of their own gender as I do the opposite; and, as with every person, to be free of my and society's judgement of their lives so long as they aren't really hurting anybody. And to that same extent, Orph, you are more than welcome to hold whatever opinions you damn well please.

Nobody says you have to love homosexuality. I will say that it is not good to forget human compassion for anyone, even your enemies, whoever they may be. I will say that if you are willing to claim that you have the right to believe and live the way you like without explanation, then homosexuals, too, have that right.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Apr 17th at 1:12am 2005


? quoting Cassius

Nobody says you have to love homosexuality. I will say that it is not good to forget human compassion for anyone, even your enemies, whoever they may be. I will say that if you are willing to claim that you have the right to believe and live the way you like without explanation, then homosexuals, too, have that right.

my compassions run deeper than you seem to imagine. more than once i have proclaimed my dislike for homosexuality, but never once have i claimed to hate gay people.

and the crux of the matter is this, the entire thread i have been repeatedly asked to explain myself. thats a concept i just cannot fathom. i totally disagree with satches views, violently so, but never once did i even hint that he had to explain those views. they are his and i wouldn't dream of denying him them.

time and again i have been told that gays have rights, but it never seems to dawn upon anyone that in the same breath they are also saying i do not.

these discussions always end the same.. no one learns from them.. i fully expect new members like satch to screw the pooch, but not old timers like you.. you have been involved in virtually every conversation about gays since we have been here. have you not figured me out yet? i truly didn't think you that slow. smiley

we have a gay member here.. a valued member. i do not think of him as gay. he may find that offensive, or he may be relieved, i dunno.. i would never ask. but i do care if/when i upset him in these topics.. i curb my words accordingly.. if i wrote exactly how i felt, no one would be able to read it without some strong emotions. tact.. i do have it and use it as long as possible. as long as you guys allow me to.

the bigot comment, it negated all thoughts of tact.. it was tasteless, and evil to say such a thing, especially when it really did not apply in this case.

the moment it was posted, all bets were off.

people who take cheap shots like that do not belong in a serious conversation.

/ rant

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by DrGlass on Sun Apr 17th at 1:16am 2005


? quote:
I will say that if you are willing to claim that you have the right to believe and live the way you like without explanation, then homosexuals, too, have that right.



Agreed.

Orph, I cant say I have ever been told by anyone that homosexuality is right. I only assume that a homosexual would view their choise in life as 'right'. Really that is besides the point, I only ment to say that there are people for and against homosexuals.

forgive my poor spelling, I blame dyslexia.
[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Cassius on Sun Apr 17th at 1:16am 2005


I've had occasion to argue with every regular. [addsig]



Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Apr 17th at 1:27am 2005


? quoting Cassius
I've had occasion to argue with every regular.

you and i have locked horns a time or two, but can you say that we have not become if not better friends, we have at least reached an understanding of companionism?

anyways, be it known, i am fully cognizant that my views are not popular.. but please stop asking me to explain.. its very bad, even worse than bigotry.

even if you disagree with that, at least show me the same respect that i show others. when i ask "why", then you may ask as well.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Cassius on Sun Apr 17th at 4:43am 2005


Nickelplate - in response to your post in the derailed thread - have you ever taken a biology class?





Quote
Re: lamda
Posted by Leperous on Sun Apr 17th at 6:21am 2005


So, what's actually wrong with being homosexual then, given that it doesn't hurt anyone and we live in a (supposedly) free world?






Post Reply