Micheal Jackson
Post Reply
Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by French Toast on Mon Jun 13th at 9:19pm 2005


Just watched the live broadcast, MJ is not guilty on all charges!

w00t.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 9:22pm 2005


And now the question is: was this outcome the result of the power of money (namely bribery) or of the power of truth.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by $loth on Mon Jun 13th at 9:29pm 2005


I very much doubt they were bribed, for one michael is practically broke.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 9:34pm 2005


...he is?




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by gimpinthesink on Mon Jun 13th at 9:41pm 2005


yeh he is I heard that he's been spending something like $3 million more than he's earnt


<B><A HREF="http://www.ben-hodgson.co.uk" TARGET="_blank">Tinterweb site</A></B>
<B><A HREF="http://gimpinthesink.deviantart.com" TARGET="_blank">Deviantart</A></B>

<FONT COLOR=gold>Human knowledge belongs to the world</FONT>



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by G4MER on Mon Jun 13th at 10:05pm 2005


I think he is Guilty, but either the proscution didnt make the case with out a doubt, or they jury was worried about the MJ fanaics and thier lives, or maybe both. Ahh who cares.. let the little freak be free.. he would of been dish of the day in prosion.. not that he wouldnt deserve it.. but Death by Hookie pookie.. OUCH!




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Cash Car Star on Mon Jun 13th at 10:11pm 2005


Which, considering he owns a significant portion of the Beatles' music catalog, means he just doesn't understand money.



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 13th at 10:14pm 2005


One can be not innocent and yet still be not guilty guys..

Michaels biggest defect is that he keeps getting caught in questionable situations. I doubt very much that he actually did anything wrong.. The problem with the word "Wrong" is it is open to to many interpretations. What I consider wrong, may not even cause a ripple for others, and what still others consider wrong I would consider criminal...

I say he is innocent of all charges, but say honestly, had he been convicted of anything that the parents of these children share the punishment since ultimately THEY are the only ones responsible.





The best things in life, aren't things.



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Pegs on Mon Jun 13th at 10:29pm 2005


its realy as i thought (in my head)

Ill keep it short and simple: The kids were attempting to get money of him becuase they sore a chance too, the last case that was "meant to happen" he payed them off with money, i think they were hoping for the same. In other words there trying to get money from him.

That said, he is a still a bloody wacko, just look at his bloody skin colour and nose, i mean the skin colour is a possable desease but his nose LOL you must be joking, thats no desease.

Edit: Not realy short and simple x.X





Yes, My spelling is still terrible!



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by fishy on Mon Jun 13th at 11:45pm 2005


i don't doubt that he'd have been burned at the stake in the good old days.....


i eat paint



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 11:47pm 2005


? quote:
but his nose LOL you must be joking, thats no desease.





It...fell off...once *ROFL*.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 13th at 11:51pm 2005


? quoting fishy
i don't doubt that he'd have been burned at the stake in the good old days.....

Don't doubt it meself, but thinkin on it, just how many "life choices" wouldn't have landed someone in hot water in days gone by? (for you assholes about to bitch, there are other life choices besides the fudge packin kind )

Our life today... It would make the soldiers of old turn over in their graves. I can just imagine.. If it were possible to describe today, to someone in the trenches, just how many would have gone A.W.O.L?

Personally, I won't ever go to war for a such. :/





The best things in life, aren't things.



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by G4MER on Tue Jun 14th at 12:12am 2005


It used to be morally allowed to have sex with small boys at one time in history.. the Romans were well known for this fact.

Just goes to prove if your rich, and a wack job, you get to get away with just about anything and live in big fancy houses.. if your poor and a wack job, your in some padded cell wishing to be free. Gotta love the power of money.

Like I said on MSN messenger to one of the SnarkPit crue.. I think he is Guilty. But hey I was not on the jury.. so my voice in this matter does not count..




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Cassius on Tue Jun 14th at 1:50am 2005


You're right, Money - it doesn't. These twelve people were a thousand times more informed about this case than anyone else in the country. Their judgment is more valuable than ours.



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Mephs on Tue Jun 14th at 7:51am 2005


I've said it on numerous occasions, and hey! I'm going to say it again:

If Michael Jackson wasn't a millionare and was simply some guy who lives in your town, we would not even be having this discussion. Its quite obvious that his money and fame got him off the hook -whether or not he was guilty/not guilty isn't even applicable, in any other case of child molestation that evidence would have sent him down.

To be honest I've lost interest in the whole thing; he's a nonce and the parents were as guilty as him, pimping out their child for sex then trying to get a story out of it. I don't care WHO someone is, be it Ghandi or the Dali lama, if a grown man asks you to let your kids sleep over, you obviously say no.

Good music though.

[edit: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/southern_counties/4090216.stm

OH NOES!!! (for all you non-uk chaps, he's probably the best known footballer ever, over here, who is also a severe alcoholic. WTF is it with fame and shagging kids?]




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by $loth on Tue Jun 14th at 8:21am 2005


Now that the MJ case is over they will need someone else to pimp.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Leperous on Tue Jun 14th at 10:01am 2005


Pray tell how money and fame got him off the hook, given that the jurors will now slide back into obscurity? Are you suggesting they were dazzled by his beautiful face, or that they were bribed?



Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Windows 98 on Tue Jun 14th at 11:02am 2005


I think Mike would enjoy his time in jail if he went. This was like a win win situation. In jail you can get it up the ass all day from guys in the shower. "Ooops I dropped my soap, Tyrone I'm bending over TEHEHE"

And being innocent gets him out of the problem. He can just go home and get it up the ass from his little boys. Either way I think he is guilty.






Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by G4MER on Tue Jun 14th at 11:34am 2005


Well after watching FOX news this morning and seeing the interviews with the jury members. One lady said.. the mother snapped her fingers at us, i was not about to let her get away with that... And another said I think he is guilty, but they just didn't prove it.. they let this guy walk. What a bunch of dumb asses this jury is/was.




Quote
Re: Micheal Jackson
Posted by Agent Smith on Tue Jun 14th at 11:50am 2005


I hope you don't get all your news from Fox. If you do I'd suggest trying some more impartial, less sensational, news services.



Ham and Jam Contributor
http://www.hamandjam.org

'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'




Post Reply