Posted by French Toast on Mon Jun 13th at 9:19pm 2005
w00t.
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 9:22pm 2005
Posted by $loth on Mon Jun 13th at 9:29pm 2005
$loth
member
2256 posts
286 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 27th 2004
Location: South England

Occupation: Student
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 9:34pm 2005
Posted by gimpinthesink on Mon Jun 13th at 9:41pm 2005
gimpinthesink
member
662 posts
156 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 21st 2002
Location: Forest Town, Notts

Occupation: student
<B><A HREF="http://gimpinthesink.deviantart.com" TARGET="_blank">Deviantart</A></B>
<FONT COLOR=gold>Human knowledge belongs to the world</FONT>
Posted by G4MER on Mon Jun 13th at 10:05pm 2005
Posted by Cash Car Star on Mon Jun 13th at 10:11pm 2005
Cash Car Star
member
1260 posts
301 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 7th 2002
Location: Connecticut (sigh)
Occupation: post-student
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 13th at 10:14pm 2005
One can be not innocent and yet still be not guilty guys..
Michaels biggest defect is that he keeps getting caught in questionable situations. I doubt very much that he actually did anything wrong.. The problem with the word "Wrong" is it is open to to many interpretations. What I consider wrong, may not even cause a ripple for others, and what still others consider wrong I would consider criminal...
I say he is innocent of all charges, but say honestly, had he been convicted of anything that the parents of these children share the punishment since ultimately THEY are the only ones responsible.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Pegs on Mon Jun 13th at 10:29pm 2005
Ill keep it short and simple: The kids were attempting to get money of him becuase they sore a chance too, the last case that was "meant to happen" he payed them off with money, i think they were hoping for the same. In other words there trying to get money from him.
That said, he is a still a bloody wacko, just look at his bloody skin colour and nose, i mean the skin colour is a possable desease but his nose LOL you must be joking, thats no desease.
Edit: Not realy short and simple x.X

Yes, My spelling is still terrible!
Posted by fishy on Mon Jun 13th at 11:45pm 2005
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 13th at 11:47pm 2005
It...fell off...once *ROFL*.

Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 13th at 11:51pm 2005
Don't doubt it meself, but thinkin on it, just how many "life choices" wouldn't have landed someone in hot water in days gone by? (for you assholes about to bitch, there are other life choices besides the fudge packin kind
)
Our life today... It would make the soldiers of old turn over in their graves. I can just imagine.. If it were possible to describe today, to someone in the trenches, just how many would have gone A.W.O.L?
Personally, I won't ever go to war for a such. :/
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by G4MER on Tue Jun 14th at 12:12am 2005
Just goes to prove if your rich, and a wack job, you get to get away with just about anything and live in big fancy houses.. if your poor and a wack job, your in some padded cell wishing to be free. Gotta love the power of money.
Like I said on MSN messenger to one of the SnarkPit crue.. I think he is Guilty. But hey I was not on the jury.. so my voice in this matter does not count..
Posted by Cassius on Tue Jun 14th at 1:50am 2005
Posted by Mephs on Tue Jun 14th at 7:51am 2005
If Michael Jackson wasn't a millionare and was simply some guy who lives in your town, we would not even be having this discussion. Its quite obvious that his money and fame got him off the hook -whether or not he was guilty/not guilty isn't even applicable, in any other case of child molestation that evidence would have sent him down.
To be honest I've lost interest in the whole thing; he's a nonce and the parents were as guilty as him, pimping out their child for sex then trying to get a story out of it. I don't care WHO someone is, be it Ghandi or the Dali lama, if a grown man asks you to let your kids sleep over, you obviously say no.
Good music though.
[edit: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/southern_counties/4090216.stm
OH NOES!!! (for all you non-uk chaps, he's probably the best known footballer ever, over here, who is also a severe alcoholic. WTF is it with fame and shagging kids?]
Mephs
member
381 posts
38 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 18th 2004
Location: Northern Ireland

Occupation: Office Monkey
Posted by $loth on Tue Jun 14th at 8:21am 2005
$loth
member
2256 posts
286 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 27th 2004
Location: South England

Occupation: Student
Posted by Leperous on Tue Jun 14th at 10:01am 2005
Leperous
member
3382 posts
788 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 21st 2001
Location: UK
Occupation: Lazy student
Posted by Windows 98 on Tue Jun 14th at 11:02am 2005
And being innocent gets him out of the problem. He can just go home and get it up the ass from his little boys. Either way I think he is guilty.
Windows 98
member
757 posts
86 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 25th 2005
Location: USA

Occupation: Student
Posted by G4MER on Tue Jun 14th at 11:34am 2005
Posted by Agent Smith on Tue Jun 14th at 11:50am 2005
Agent Smith
member
803 posts
200 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: NSW, Australia

Occupation: Uni Student
http://www.hamandjam.org
'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0244 seconds.


