Posted by satchmo on Mon Jun 27th at 8:32pm 2005
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 27th at 8:42pm 2005
I'm sorry if I hit a sore point there, and I sincerely apologise if I did.
Ah, don't worry about it
And I guess I was a little harsh but I was so outraged to hear that such a method is commonly being used in modern times...
As for the fighter-pilots, they're more easily detectable than snipers are and thus in more danger.
Posted by pepper on Mon Jun 27th at 9:01pm 2005
[rant]
Aint no fun, in the old days you wouldnt fire a rocket to a bogey from 2 kilometres, then you wou only fire under a little deflaction, offcourse firing over 200m would be a waste of shots nowadays you got sam site that can fire hughe distances etc. And they even gave it a name! Modern Warfare!
[/rant]
pepper design
The strength of the turbulence is directly proportional to the temperature of your coffee.
Posted by satchmo on Mon Jun 27th at 10:03pm 2005
Unless they're flying a stealth bomber.
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Posted by French Toast on Mon Jun 27th at 10:20pm 2005
Because Americans were the only people fighting in WWII, and of course we should all be praising this war on iraq because it's just so damn awesome.
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Andrei on Mon Jun 27th at 10:42pm 2005
What I don't understand is what "grateful enough" is supposed to mean. What did the US expect them to do considering the fact that France didn't exactly come out of the war very rich. :/
Posted by Dr Brasso on Tue Jun 28th at 12:12am 2005
cant believe the uninformed, unmitigated bulls**t im reading....
/////me salutes sniper Place....hooyah!
/////walks away shaking head...
Doc B
Dr Brasso
member
1878 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: Omaha,NE

Occupation: cad drafter
Posted by Cassius on Tue Jun 28th at 1:39am 2005
Posted by Agent Smith on Tue Jun 28th at 1:58am 2005
I generally have tremendous respect for soldiers who fight wars, particularly if they are on the "good" side. It takes a tremendous amount of guts and sacrifice to put your life on the line for others, and I salute them.
The problem is that nowadays war tends to be shown in glorious detail, and more liberal citizens don't feel that war is appropriate anymore. I feel extremely sorry for Vietnam veterans, who were young men, often conscripted, and returned with many emotional and psychological problems to country's that no longer supported war, and therefore turned their backs on them.
WW2 was really the last clean war, in the sense that the enemy was obviously evil, and that war was the only just and true option.
Agent Smith
member
803 posts
200 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: NSW, Australia

Occupation: Uni Student
http://www.hamandjam.org
'Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape!'
Posted by French Toast on Tue Jun 28th at 1:58am 2005
Just some random stuff there for ya.
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by satchmo on Tue Jun 28th at 2:04am 2005
Yeah, and if the enemy is a good shot, you'll never get a chance to return fire. That doesn't make any sense.
If I were a soldier, I wouldn't wait to be shot at first.
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Posted by Dr Brasso on Tue Jun 28th at 2:12am 2005
yes frenchie, yer wrong. the commanders are supposed to be schooled in the relative ethics of war, and are therefore qualified (knock on wood) to set the rules of engagement for a particular scenario. it is war after all, it aint pretty, but it IS sometimes necessary. and we always assume we are the good guys. always.
you couldnt do what YOU do, if they didnt do what they do.
......btw, zeppelin rocks...still.... ![]()
peace.
ps....sorry so vague, but im trying like hell not to get into this debate ...its old, and its useless.
Doc Brasso...
Dr Brasso
member
1878 posts
198 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 30th 2003
Location: Omaha,NE

Occupation: cad drafter
Posted by rs6 on Tue Jun 28th at 2:32am 2005
Pfft...i alreadly got 2 silver stars in BF2.
Seriously though, that guy is amazing.
rs6
member
640 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 31st 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA

Occupation: koledge
Posted by Dark Tree on Tue Jun 28th at 2:36am 2005
Knock knock...
Whos there?
The U.S.
The U.S. who?
The U.S. kicks ass
Knock knock...
Whos there?
War
War who?
War is f**king pointless, and yet, seemingly inevitable
Dark Tree
member
646 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: USA

Occupation: DigiPen student
Posted by Adam Hawkins on Tue Jun 28th at 11:14am 2005
Yeah, and if the enemy is a good shot, you'll never get a chance to return fire. That doesn't make any sense.
If I were a soldier, I wouldn't wait to be shot at first.
So you would quite happily shoot someone just cos they look a bit dodgy and might want to kill you?
Adam Hawkins
member
858 posts
333 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 25th 2002
Location: Chesterfield, UK

Occupation: Specialty Systems Manager
Posted by Andrei on Tue Jun 28th at 1:14pm 2005
So you would quite happily shoot someone just cos they look a bit dodgy and might want to kill you?
This is just what I was thinking of. And normal grunts can take POWs, but a sniper can't so, rather than letting them go and allowing them to regroup, shooting them is considered a better option. And sometimes mistakes are made.
Posted by wil5on on Tue Jun 28th at 2:01pm 2005
I hardly see how a sniper is a coward. Youre sitting there in a pile of rubble, the slightest move could give away your position. If you fire, it could give away your position. If they find out your position, they could come up behind you and kill you, or knock you unconscious and torture you. Wounding enemy soldiers to distract the rest could, and probably would in that situation, save your life.
wil5on
member
1733 posts
323 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2003
Location: Adelaide

Occupation: Mapper
- My yr11 Economics teacher
Posted by Kain on Tue Jun 28th at 2:19pm 2005
Kain
member
225 posts
33 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 24th 2003
Location: Lebanon (Middle East)

Occupation: Architect
Posted by Andrei on Tue Jun 28th at 2:25pm 2005
And according to his own policy on nuclear projects, he should declare war on himself.
Posted by satchmo on Tue Jun 28th at 3:45pm 2005
Judging from how stupid he is, he probably had in the past. His security councils possibly stopped the order from getting too far and being carried out.
He probably still needs Condee to wipe his ass after he craps.
satchmo
member
2077 posts
396 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 24th 2004
Location: Los Angeles, U.S.

Occupation: pediatrician
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0118 seconds.


