Thanks for the clarification. ![]()
Just testing something. I was wondering how you quoted people/replies. Cool feature.
Thanks for the clarification. ![]()
Just testing something. I was wondering how you quoted people/replies. Cool feature.

Thanks for the clarification. ![]()
Just testing something. I was wondering how you quoted people/replies. Cool feature.

Junk in the trunk. Not much for thin chicks.


or depravity, even
I talk to my teenage patients every day about sex. It's part of the medical visit.
I am going to be very frank with my own kids about sex. It shouldn't be a big mystery. It's a normal part of a natural, healthy life.
Besides, if parents keep this topic shrouded in secrecy, curiosity would just take over and kids would get inaccurate information from peers or (worse) from the internet. That's how bad information about STD and rumors get started.
Ignorance or bad information breeds dangerous situations.

I am going to be very frank with my own kids about sex. It shouldn't be a big mystery. It's a normal part of a natural, healthy life.
Without taking sides on the issue I feel that there is a marginal difference here. For one thing, the parents of the children you see have more/less given permission for you to have this talk. Secondly, you can and should raise your children as you see fit, within reason. Lastly, this site does not give you permission to talk about sex indiscriminately. I am not saying for one moment that you have done so, but the topic keeps degrading to what should be allowed or not. naked bodies is not bad, intercourse is a definite no-no. Debating the finer definitions between the two is moot since there is no finer line than "The parents of the minors on this site have not told you its OK"
Thats about as plain as I can say it.


By giving their kids full reign of the internet, the parents have already consented to all sorts of stuff online.
I don't have to tell you that there are a lot worse things you can google than the stuff going on in this thread.
P.S. And male birds don't even have penises. They have a cloaca instead. How relevant is that?

I don't have to tell you that there are a lot worse things you and google than the stuff going on in this thread.
Then it boils down to respect. If you respect this site, its owner, and its patrons, then you defer to their right to say "NO"
I have no minors here, but even so, I decline my permission to talk about intercourse no matter how its rationalized into sounding proper.
I feel that if even one person says no, then that should be enough. Without looking at my feet as Mr. Reno says, I do not feel its proper.
I have said my peace, and cannot add anything more. Good luck.


EDIT BY MOD: Yes yes, very clever and ALMOST topical " SRC="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif"> I don't think the forum needs people encouraging paedophilia however.


