Most simplisticness please.
Post Reply
Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 2:54pm 2005


Can someone explain the personal rating system. It doesn't seem to follow any pattern I can distinguish. Do we rate how we like people, or how we feel they are a contributing member of the community. Contrary to what you may think, the two concepts are not interchangeable. I for instance, am a good person, but have contributed nothing, so I might rate high on one and low on the other.

Please define which is employed here. Thanks in advance.




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Mephs on Sat Jul 30th at 3:26pm 2005


Theres somewhere else for this post. Find it. It's not hard. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif">




Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 3:30pm 2005


? quoting Mephs
Theres somewhere else for this post. Find it. It's not hard.

"as I slide bar toward the 1"

OK. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">

I suppose I will search some more. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/sad.gif">




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Mephs on Sat Jul 30th at 3:48pm 2005


Site suggestions/bugs!

* chases Underdog with a big stick into said sticky thread!




Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 3:54pm 2005


Jokes aside for the moment.. "dodges stick"

Are you suggesting I search that thread? Its huge..




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by OtZman on Sat Jul 30th at 5:53pm 2005


I think he means you should search using the search function. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_wink.gif">

Click "forums". Under the list of forums click "search the forums".








Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by DrGlass on Sat Jul 30th at 8:10pm 2005


well... this isn't a suggestion or bug, and its not really something to seach for. Its a question, but not a mapping question... so I'd say this is the righ place for it.

I dont really rate many people (i'd just give them 5s anyways) but i think you should rate people on how much they contribute to the site. Take Orph for instance, he sometimes has unpopular veiws and can be a nag when it comes to image files sizes (some one has to do it) but if some one, anyone, asks him to review their map he will do it. He will even ask others to give them a review (he has sent me a few PMs with links to maps) so while you may not agree with him, as far as the site goes, he is a 5.

Then on the other hand, some one may be real nice and not do jack-anything for the site. In that case I dont rate them... BUT if they are an ass that does jack-crap on the site, i give them a 1 or 2.






Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 8:15pm 2005


So, how come only some people have the option then? I see some pretty special members that cannot be rated at all. Seems a bit unfair to me. I also see some people who do not contribute jack, and have the option available. That also seems unfair. Why would losers have the option and not valued members?

What am I missing yet?

I would like to meet this Orpheus. He seems like the kind of person you would most like to hate, but can't when you add all his pro's and con's together.




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Sat Jul 30th at 9:24pm 2005


You rate people however you want to rate them. Myself, I interpret the rating to be "mapping talent" rather than personal worth or contribution.




Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by OtZman on Sat Jul 30th at 9:35pm 2005


? quote:
So, how come only some people have the option then? I see some pretty special members that cannot be rated at all. Seems a bit unfair to me. I also see some people who do not contribute jack, and have the option available. That also seems unfair. Why would losers have the option and not valued members?


In your "Control Panel" under "Edit Preferences" you can set your rating to be visible or hidden or you can choose not to be rated at all.






Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 9:37pm 2005


? quoting OtZman



In your "Control Panel" under "Edit Preferences" you can set your rating to be visible or hidden or you can choose not to be rated at all.

I do not have none of those options.

"update"

Oh yeah I do, sort of. I guess what it is, is I cannot rate myself so I cannot see mine. THAT makes sense. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Hugh on Sat Jul 30th at 9:48pm 2005


None of us can rate you because you don't have any maps.

This is how I rate people:

1 = crappy maps + jackass + I HATE YOU
2 = crappy maps + jackass
3 = I don't use 3's
4 = good maps + jackass
5 = good maps + interesting



One day you'll know what you're talking about, I can hardly imagine

Maps! - Audio blog!



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 9:55pm 2005


I do not have any maps? Thats crap. What does someone do who is valuable to the site, yet creates no maps, nor is interested in doing so?

I think some other factors should be included. I feel cheated, and I am a nobody. I imagine some of you non mappers must really be miffed.

Anyway, since it seems reliant on maps to initiate the action, perhaps I should make something. Then again, without a map, you will have to rant about me via the open forums. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif">




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by rival on Sat Jul 30th at 10:02pm 2005


? quoting Underdog
I do not have any maps? Thats crap. What does someone do who is valuable to the site, yet creates no maps, nor is interested in doing so?

I think some other factors should be included. I feel cheated, and I am a nobody. I imagine some of you non mappers must really be miffed.

Anyway, since it seems reliant on maps to initiate the action, perhaps I should make something. Then again, without a map, you will have to rant about me via the open forums.

you can be valuable to the site just by posting! this is a mapping site though...




Bullet Control: $5000 for a bullet.
&quot;I would blow your f**king head off! ...if I could afford it. I'm gonna get another job, start saving some money... then you a dead man!&quot;



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Underdog on Sat Jul 30th at 10:43pm 2005


My problem right this moment seems to be my observational skills. I keep finding new things to see here, but they are not new to you guys apparently.

This whole thread for instance. Yes, my question was answered, yet not. Thats not really an issue worth making a fuss over, but still I feel like I am overlooking vital portions of Snarkpit.

Hell, I just realized that one of my all time favorite HL2DM maps has the author right here. Thats exciting, and depressing at the same time. Exciting that he is here, but it took me, to long to realize.

I will be glad when winter arrives. This is my heavy workload time of year and I have no spare time for much. In fact, I should be working now but....




There is no history until something happens, then there is.



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Forceflow on Sun Jul 31st at 8:27am 2005


I rate every person who helps me out, in whatever way, be it a mapping problem or some program I cannot find.

Also, people who really made a good map (= a map I crack open a third or a fourth time after downloading, just for fun) get a rating.

The same goes for people who are very active on the forum.



:: Forceflow.be :: Nuclear Dawn developer



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Mephs on Sun Jul 31st at 12:49pm 2005


? quote:
What does someone do who is valuable to the site, yet creates no maps, nor is interested in doing so?


They call themselves Mephs, and lurk on forums and IRC for the hell of it. :P

*still wonders what exactly he does here!




Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Leperous on Sun Jul 31st at 1:20pm 2005


You rate it how you want to rate it, since there's no way to police the thing (I say police, but any "official meaning" would also lead someone to interpret their rating in that way, which may be incorrect as to how they've been rated so far by people). Ideally it would be on their mapping abilities...



Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by DrGlass on Sun Jul 31st at 9:47pm 2005


I judge people more on their snarkmarks than anything else.




Quote
Re: Most simplisticness please.
Posted by Cash Car Star on Sun Jul 31st at 9:52pm 2005


Here's how I rate people - If I see someone who's rating I don't agree with (either too high or too low), I cast a 1 or a 5 vote to swing it towards where I think it should be. I currently run the board in condensed view, so I don't see people's ratings (along with their av's and sig's) so you all are currently spared my judgemental righteous wrath.




Post Reply