What's your opinion on the aligations against Lance Armstrong? Do you
think he really took drugs or are the French just trying to get back at
him for beating them in their own race?
1
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by French Toast on Mon Aug 29th at 3:19pm 2005

French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada
Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by French Toast on Mon Aug 29th at 3:19pm 2005
I don't think he did. I think he was just reall determined after getting cancer, and busted some serious ass.
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by Dark_Kilauea on Mon Aug 29th at 8:53pm 2005

Dark_Kilauea
member
629 posts
93 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 15th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Fast Food
Posted by Dark_Kilauea on Mon Aug 29th at 8:53pm 2005
I agree.
Dark_Kilauea
member
629 posts
93 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 15th 2005
Location: USA

Occupation: Fast Food
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by Forceflow on Mon Aug 29th at 9:14pm 2005

Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium
Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by Forceflow on Mon Aug 29th at 9:14pm 2005
The evidence is there, you know.
What the French don't say is that their national hero (Richard Virenque) tested positive too in the '99 TDF.
What the French don't say is that their national hero (Richard Virenque) tested positive too in the '99 TDF.
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
:: Forceflow.be :: Nuclear Dawn developer
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by WarloK on Mon Aug 29th at 9:48pm 2005
Posted by WarloK on Mon Aug 29th at 9:48pm 2005
It's common for the French to be mean to the Americans.
Quote Simpsons "Come to France and we will mock the country that saved us twice from the Germans.
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by mazemaster on Mon Aug 29th at 10:46pm 2005
Posted by mazemaster on Mon Aug 29th at 10:46pm 2005
What "evidence" is this, FF?
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by BlisTer on Tue Aug 30th at 12:14am 2005
Posted by BlisTer on Tue Aug 30th at 12:14am 2005
urine samples they took in '99. they initially weren't supposed for
drugtest reasons. yet they did the test. the thing is, normally you
need A and B samples, now they only had A samples (which were all
positive). so they have no legal grounds. imo most of the good ones
take some kinds of drugs, it's just a matter of being clever and not
getting caught.
there was an anti-smoking drug once, no official sources knew this, but at a certain temperature they acted in the same way as EPO, so cyclists took this.
anyway, im not a fan of the sport so i dont really care
there was an anti-smoking drug once, no official sources knew this, but at a certain temperature they acted in the same way as EPO, so cyclists took this.
anyway, im not a fan of the sport so i dont really care
These words are my diaries screaming out loud
Re: Lance Armstrong
Posted by Hugh on Tue Aug 30th at 12:54am 2005

Hugh
member
900 posts
170 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 25th 2003
Location: Amerika
Occupation: College Student
Posted by Hugh on Tue Aug 30th at 12:54am 2005
He did take those drugs, he admitted that much, but it was part of his
cancer treatment... I don't think he used it as an advantage in cycling
since '99 was the only year he tested positive for it.
Hugh
member
900 posts
170 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 25th 2003
Location: Amerika

Occupation: College Student
1
© Snarkpit.net 2001 - 2023, about us, donate, contact
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0084 seconds.

Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0084 seconds.

