O.K. we all seem fair minded enough to handle a poll of this nature. With that thought in mind lets see how a purely hypothetical poll would result.
The poll is multi-situational but essentially all encompassing if you take them all in scope. The question is "Who is more at fault if a person or persons is harmed through an act?"
Situations would be as such,
- You know you have the right to walk down any alley in New York. There is also the criminal element in said alley. If you walked down the alley and were killed would it be your fault or the criminals?
- You are gay. You feel it is well within your right to display affection in public. You are also in a redneck bar and the outlook on gays are spotty at best. If you act on your urges and the bar folk beat you to a pulp is it the bars patrons fault or yours?
- You are in a drive through zoo park. The sign says to remain in the car. Is it your fault or the animals for leaving the window down and being mauled? (This example is slightly out of sync but still viable if you consider that some people are just this stupid)
- The bottle clearly states "Do not take internally, death may occur" You cannot read and after swallowing you find yourself before Saint Peter.
There are many other examples but you should by now get the general theme which is, "You may be right, but wrong at the same time"
Footnote: I realize that this poll could go almost anyplace please try to be tactful if your reply will single out anyone. Stupid may be universal but expressing stupidity is not.



