Posted by jake on Thu Sep 22nd at 4:28am 2005
Ass: In England, the more upper-class (or pretentious) you are, the longer and more drawn out the "a" sound in words like bath and castle. Classless Americans wouldn't put up with that sort of thing and words like the above were given the short "a" treatment; quite right, too, in my opinion. I think that's what happened to the word arse - a terrible thing. I've no quibbles with American's using it, obviously, but it's becoming more prevalent in England and I fear it's spreading. :-(
Posted by Nickelplate on Thu Sep 22nd at 4:44am 2005
To put the "data" thing to rest: the preferred pronunciation is "day-tuh," however Dot-uh and dah-tuh (like as in "dad") are also accepted.
Data is plural of the latin word "datum" which comes from the latin word dare (pronounced dah-ray) which means "to give" or "it is given," or "it gives."
lol, jake, ever since I got back from england and was used to using "cheers" a lot, Other people around me have started saying it.
Which reminds me so many people spell "a lot" as "alot"
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Cassius on Thu Sep 22nd at 4:56am 2005
Posted by jake on Thu Sep 22nd at 5:11am 2005
Which reminds me so many people spell "a lot" as "alot"
That's what's happening to all right - alright is horrible but it will be victorious in the end, like already.
Posted by Windows 98 on Thu Sep 22nd at 5:12am 2005
iight
Windows 98
member
757 posts
86 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 25th 2005
Location: USA

Occupation: Student
Posted by BlisTer on Thu Sep 22nd at 5:19am 2005
Posted by Nickelplate on Thu Sep 22nd at 5:55am 2005
yeah, that's fine... if they don't care if thier style/tone is set to "idiotic."
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by French Toast on Thu Sep 22nd at 11:33am 2005
For me, it's teenage girls who say TTYL in real life.
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Thu Sep 22nd at 11:36am 2005
Pvt.Scythe
member
730 posts
113 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 19th 2004
Location: Finland

Occupation: student
Dystopia - Empires
Posted by French Toast on Thu Sep 22nd at 11:44am 2005
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Dark Tree on Thu Sep 22nd at 11:51am 2005
own
Proper pronunciaction:
pone
Dark Tree
member
646 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: USA

Occupation: DigiPen student
Posted by Underdog on Thu Sep 22nd at 12:01pm 2005
For good or ill, people judge you on the words/phrases you chose to employ. To a point I agree with you but, many people deliberately portray themselves as stupid and/or uneducated with their speech mannerisms. If they can live with that, more power to them but I am betting that given this bit of information they would rethink their choices.
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by Myrk- on Thu Sep 22nd at 12:14pm 2005
Here in the UK South West, a lot of people say Narely instead of nearly (pronounced like a horse mare). Crazyness I tells ya!
Oh and for the record- ALUMINIUM! YOU FOOLISH AMERICANS! Why remove a letter eh?! WHY!
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by Crono on Thu Sep 22nd at 12:35pm 2005
I don't know. But, you have to admit, going by spelling rules a lot of spelling practices shouldn't exist.
Posted by Loco on Thu Sep 22nd at 1:45pm 2005
I don't know. But, you have to admit, going by spelling rules a lot of spelling practices shouldn't exist.
Doughnut, donut.
'nuff said.
Posted by Underdog on Thu Sep 22nd at 1:51pm 2005
iight
Actually its more like "Ahh-ite"
Another one I dislike is "Yaller" roughly translates to the word color "Yellow" when asked to spell it.
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by jake on Thu Sep 22nd at 1:57pm 2005
Here in the UK South West, a lot of people say Narely instead of nearly (pronounced like a horse mare). Crazyness I tells ya!
That's just an accent, though, Myrk. Accents are wonderful and should be preserved. It's pronounced Nare-ly in Hull, too - in Bradford we say Nur-ly - In Burnley they say nurr-ly and in Liverpool it's nay-lee and we are all within a few miles of each other. It's great that you can tell where people come from by their vowel sounds, it allows for instant prejudice.
Oh and for the record- ALUMINIUM! YOU FOOLISH AMERICANS! Why remove a letter eh?! WHY!
Well said, that man. A-LOO-min-um really jars on the ear. I think it's wilfulness on the part of the Americans, they stress the wrong syllables simply to annoy.
They do it with proper names, too.
Bernard (BURN-ud) becomes bu-NARD
Maurice/Morris (MORR-is) becomes mo-REESE
If they cant stress the wrong syllable then they do the next best thing - they bugger about with the vowels so that:
Basil (BA-zil) becomes Bay-zil
Cecil (CESS-il) becomes SEE-sil
Is COAL-in for Colin widespread or is it just Colin Powell? It's the only time Iv'e heard it pronounced like that but I can't think of another American called Colin
I think we should leave well alone and resist all attempts to reform spelling. Illogically spelled words account for only a minute fraction of one per-cent of the sum total. Mark Twain said it best.
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling by Mark Twain
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter 'c' would be dropped to be replased either by 'k' or 's', and likewise 'x' would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which 'c' would be retained would be the 'ch' formation, which will be dealt with later.
Year 2 might reform 'w' spelling, so that 'which' and 'one' would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish 'y' replasing it with 'i' and Iear 4 might fiks the 'g/j' anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants.
Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez 'c', 'y' and 'x' -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais 'ch', 'sh', and 'th' rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
Posted by BlisTer on Thu Sep 22nd at 1:59pm 2005
i always wondered, is resources pronounced [r?-sore-ses] or [rezore-ses].
The most funny case of mispronounciation is my prof economics who pronounced "break-even point" as "Breek-Evan point" like it were 2 guys or something.
Posted by Gollum on Thu Sep 22nd at 2:02pm 2005
- Conflation of superficially similar words. In extreme cases, this leads to the disease known as malapropism
which, though painful for the afflicted, provides much amusement to
ghoulish observers. For example, do not say "I feel nauseous"
unless you are sure that you have that effect on people. The word
you are gagging for is nauseated.
- Afflictions (or affectations) of style. The most common
malady is to mistake cliche for style; in advanced stages of the
illness, symptoms may become confused as the patient's metaphors begin
to mix. Once metaphors mix in significant numbers, there
is little hope for recovery since the disease has entered the emphatic
system.
- Degenerate sentence structure. This can usually be traced to childhood abuse; treatment requires a colonoscopy, or in less severe cases a semicolonoscopy may suffice.
- Prolixity. Most heterosexual men are unaware of the function of the prolix, except in so far as it presents a cancer risk. Whilst prolix stimulation may heighten sexual enjoyment in some men, others describe the sensation as unpleasant or even painful. It has also been shown to dilute the creative output. Very few seminal works have benefited from prolixity, with the arguable exception of Joyce's Ulysses.
Gollum
member
1268 posts
207 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 26th 2001
Location: Oxford, England

Occupation: Student
Posted by jake on Thu Sep 22nd at 2:29pm 2005
- Conflation of superficially similar words. In extreme cases, this leads to the disease known as malapropism which, though painful for the afflicted, provides much amusement to ghoulish observers. For example, do not say "I feel nauseous" unless you are sure that you have that effect on people. The word you are groping for is nauseated.
- Afflictions (or affectations) of style. The most common malady is to mistake cliche for style; in advanced stages of the illness, symptoms may become confused as the patient's metaphors begin to mix. Once metaphors begin to mix in significant numbers, there is little hope for recovery since the disease has entered the emphatic system.
- Degenerate sentence structure. This can usually be traced to childhood abuse; treatment requires a colonoscopy, or in less severe cases a semicolonoscopy may suffice.
- Prolixity. Most heterosexual men are unaware of the function of the prolix, except in so far as it presents a cancer risk. Whilst prolix stimulation may heighten sexual enjoyment in some men, others describe the sensation as unpleasant or even painful. It has also been shown to dilute the creative output. Very few seminal works have benefited from excess prolixity, with the arguable exception of Joyce's Ullysses.
Is that your own, Gollum? It's very good. You reminded me of "mispronounciation" which I hear all the time - it drives me insane.
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0099 seconds.

