You must miss the long-jump module from HL1 then. ![]()
Posted by FatStrings on Tue Oct 11th at 7:19pm 2005
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Andrei on Tue Oct 11th at 8:42pm 2005
That goes to show just how much you know about it's storyline given the fact that any 3rd grader knows Chernobyl is in Ukraine. I assume (and hope) that you were simply ignorant of the storyline and not of such a famous incident.

Posted by Myrk- on Wed Oct 12th at 12:23am 2005
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by parakeet on Wed Oct 12th at 2:27am 2005
possibly its just ME and not the american school systems... but my subconcious says otherwise..
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
www.arclan.net
Posted by Crono on Wed Oct 12th at 6:33am 2005
Posted by Andrei on Wed Oct 12th at 7:55am 2005
Original or not, you can't deny that it looks good. The colors are a little intense though...
Posted by Gaara on Wed Oct 12th at 8:05am 2005
Gaara
member
219 posts
22 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 12th 2005
Location: Australia

Occupation: Freelance Gynacologist
Posted by Andrei on Wed Oct 12th at 8:14am 2005
Posted by Gaara on Wed Oct 12th at 9:05am 2005
Thanks for the title of the book. Has anybody seen the stalker movie? If so is it any good?
Gaara
member
219 posts
22 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 12th 2005
Location: Australia

Occupation: Freelance Gynacologist
Posted by Finger on Wed Oct 12th at 9:36am 2005
I really wish that Stalker would come out of its dark hole and blow everyone away....That would be nice. That said, I'm not very optimistic about this game. Last I heard, they were trying to finish up the 'Living A.I.' ecosystem or whatever the hell they are calling it.
My gut tells me that it will have Beautiful environments, weak gameplay. I get very dubious anytime I hear of 'advanced A.I.' that thinks for itself, and delivers multitudes of fun, because it can 'outsmart the player, and use cover, and use the environment, and make toast, and call for backup, and has it's own internal desires like food and sex and healthcare...blah, blah' If this game is banking on this A.I. system to deliver the 'fun', it could very well end up being a beautiful flop. It also worries me that the game has sunk into obscurity for so long. Here's to hoping I'm wrong. Maybe they will drop that s**t like the righteous hammer of god, and make every other developer cry like a baby.
Posted by toxic-mapper on Wed Oct 12th at 12:03pm 2005
Posted by Biological Component on Wed Oct 12th at 1:29pm 2005
Posted by Andrei on Wed Oct 12th at 2:17pm 2005
Makes sense to me!
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Wed Oct 12th at 10:03pm 2005
Yak_Fighter
member
1832 posts
406 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 30th 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Posted by Underdog on Wed Oct 12th at 10:31pm 2005
After the disappointment of Civ 3 I hope 4 makes up for the loss. I was so counting on 3 to be all that and a bag of chips.
After the disappointment of 3 however, I am reserving my judgment. I do not want to jinx any chance 4 will be better.
For the record, I loved all the quakes, but miss the coop playstyle option.
Nail guns at 10 paces anyone " SRC="images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif">
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0133 seconds.


