Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Fri Oct 14th at 4:32pm 2005
What is Bush's fault was letting 4 days go by post Katrina without adequately taking care of the refugees and those stranded in the city.
Someone in New Orleans (possibly the mayor?) said something along the lines of: "the first three days were a natural disaster, the next four days were a man made disaster."
Basically, the response was pitiful, and I feel bad saying that because I didnt jump on a plane to go help, but at the same time we have a government in the hope that they'd be able to take care of the people in times of crises. I don't think anyone could argue that our government did a good job handling the aftereffects of Katrina.
Posted by Nickelplate on Fri Oct 14th at 4:46pm 2005
but everything cant be made OKAY in 4 days. they were doing SOMETHING in those 4 days. It takes more than 10 minutes to mobilize the national guard
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by fraggard on Fri Oct 14th at 4:55pm 2005
In what way did these laws restrict peoples freedom? Or did you just hear this on TV and assume it was true?
Are you implying that the US Homeland Security doesn't restrict peoples' freedom? Look it up sometime. I don't even live there, but the powers owned by the DHS are just insane. It's not just unconstitutional, it's downright oppression.
fraggard
member
1110 posts
201 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 8th 2002
Location: Bangalore, India

Occupation: Student
Posted by FatStrings on Fri Oct 14th at 5:20pm 2005
also on the issue of the skulls and bones
their moddo is "a skull above any other" basically meaning that no matter what power they have in the world, if a higher ranking skull tells them what to do, they have no choice but to do it. also that a skull takes precedence over anyone else
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Fri Oct 14th at 6:03pm 2005
Posted by smidsy on Fri Oct 14th at 6:54pm 2005
Well im not one for saying anything bad about governments but i do agree that somethings could have been prevented...but living in Northern Ireland im sorta used to inament threat of danger through bombs etc..yes 9/11 was about 60 times more worse than any bomb here but islamic terrorists and european terrorists are completely diffrent with their jihads. but when youve been on a bombsite it does tend to drive things home...i was put on rapid responce to the omagh bomb in 1998 and let me tell you that image has stuck in my head eversince.
When you see bodys in half you just cant get round the scale of the situation.
I agree with bushes anti terror but i ask this question there are active ira cells in the us what about them...there terrorists too. I agree on his polocy to get rid of terrorism but i think that he sould look no thurther than his own country. As for new orleans thats a natural disaster no one can preevnt it from happening yes they coulda been better warned but some people just couldnt get out and thats where i think bush went rong.
smidsy
member
143 posts
44 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 4th 2004
Location: uk

Occupation: ex army, working as electrition
Posted by Dark|Killer on Fri Oct 14th at 7:25pm 2005
Um hey, im a muslim myself, and i want to assure you that those "islamic" terrorists are doing nothing related to islam, and what they have done in europe and 9/11 was absolutely wrong, those terrorists are ruining the look of islam, making people think that all muslims are terrorists, and the holy quran, our religious book, didnt mention killing innoscent citizens, what they are doing is wrong, and isnt tolerated by other muslims...So, what im saying is, who collasped the towers, and exploded the underground, arent called as muslims, yet people all over the world call muslims, terrorists
I really am against all the terror groups, who call themselves muslims...
--Dark|Masta
Dark|Killer
member
758 posts
186 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 22nd 2004
Location: Dubai (Middle East)

Occupation: Student
Posted by smidsy on Fri Oct 14th at 7:35pm 2005
smidsy
member
143 posts
44 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 4th 2004
Location: uk

Occupation: ex army, working as electrition
Posted by Dark|Killer on Fri Oct 14th at 7:37pm 2005
Dont worry bro, we're cool
Dark|Killer
member
758 posts
186 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 22nd 2004
Location: Dubai (Middle East)

Occupation: Student
Posted by parakeet on Fri Oct 14th at 8:03pm 2005
Annnd.. if i'm not mistaken , the governor also rejected his request to aid with the national guard. WHY i'm not sure.. but it happened..
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
www.arclan.net
Posted by Pegs on Fri Oct 14th at 8:29pm 2005
Most of them were secret launchings made via the US, but during WW2 germans were working on radicel designs for planes n things. one was disc shapped.. and they were working on some kind of intresting anti grav experiment where 5/7 of the people working on it snufferd.
It was mainly saying that UFO's were being kept top secret somewhere deep in the US. and that Area 51 may have tech more advanced than we think. There was a pattern in the cloads of a disc shapped plumes, that was going roughly hmm 8000 mph. (so they say) due to the distance it went in the cloads without them reshaping i presume. It was shown as a long strip accros some of the earth on a radar scan, but other than that i thought that the documentry was very intresting.
There was also apparently somewhere, where one of the "UFO's" crashing and US took these pieces and changed the story about what it was about 3 times. The thing that supprises me the most of the secracy of the UFO type things that the US has, and the fact that in WW2 Germany were working on anti grav tech.
(http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsites/W/weirdworlds/alien_history/index.html) is the site for checking it out any further....
As for George Bush, ill stick with the first post, i dont know what stuff he has to deal with, so i have no comment on that.
[Edit] yay i killed the thread??

Yes, My spelling is still terrible!
Posted by FatStrings on Sat Oct 15th at 3:08am 2005
so no matter who won basically the same thing would be happening
theres also proof Bush payed kerry to throw it as well
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Andrei on Sat Oct 15th at 9:50am 2005
Oh, the technology is still there, but classified and hidden at the bottom of some drawer in the darkest and mossiest corner of the NSA basement (which technically doesn't even exist anyway
Posted by G4MER on Sat Oct 15th at 1:01pm 2005
Prove it.
Posted by French Toast on Sat Oct 15th at 1:17pm 2005
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Underdog on Sat Oct 15th at 1:47pm 2005
Can I not plead/compel someone in power to fix page #1?
Yeah, I could deal with the side scrolling but why should I have to when fixing it is so easy.
Thanks again in advance.
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Sat Oct 15th at 1:54pm 2005
It's not like you can stumble at the last 100 yards and let them pass you... people have to vote.
Posted by wil5on on Sat Oct 15th at 2:36pm 2005
Thats not proof.
You cant go flying around for free, its against the laws of thermodynamics. Even if this technology does exist (which I doubt) its just a different method of propulsion.
wil5on
member
1733 posts
323 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2003
Location: Adelaide

Occupation: Mapper
- My yr11 Economics teacher
Posted by FatStrings on Sun Oct 16th at 3:27am 2005
this was just a test but it shows how easy you can fix our voting system
and the paper ballots, i dont think i have to show proof for that
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by wil5on on Sun Oct 16th at 4:32am 2005
It's still not proof. And if you make a claim, you should be able to prove it, even if it is obvious (which in this case, it isnt).
wil5on
member
1733 posts
323 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2003
Location: Adelaide

Occupation: Mapper
- My yr11 Economics teacher
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0262 seconds.



