Posted by fishy on Sun Nov 27th at 12:14pm 2005
Posted by Gaara on Sun Nov 27th at 1:34pm 2005
Gaara
member
219 posts
22 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 12th 2005
Location: Australia

Occupation: Freelance Gynacologist
Posted by French Toast on Sun Nov 27th at 3:43pm 2005
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by wil5on on Sun Nov 27th at 10:44pm 2005
fishy, that's a good point, I didnt know that.
Toasted Frenchman, modern humans did originate in Africa 1-2 million years ago according to anthropological evidence. According to the Bible, humans originated in the garden of Eden somewhere around 8000 years ago.
wil5on
member
1733 posts
323 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2003
Location: Adelaide

Occupation: Mapper
- My yr11 Economics teacher
Posted by fishy on Sun Nov 27th at 11:32pm 2005
cain, when he was thrown out of the garden for killing his brother, went to the land of nod to find himself a wife(gen 4). my thinking on this is, that when god said "let us make man in our image, after our own likeness" (gen 1:26), what he was saying was , "let us take one of these men things, and mod him to be more like us". this would mean that the wife that cain found was an un-modded human, possibly along the lines of a sexy neanderthal chic that had a kink for murderers.
this doesn't sit well with most christians, because it conflicts with the traditional view of 'intelligent design', but is it so unbelievable?
Posted by Paladin[NL] on Tue Nov 29th at 7:40am 2005
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."(Gen 1:1)
And the next thing that is stumbled upon are the reference to 7 days. I believe those are days and I'm not speculating wether they are days days or years or millenia. If He says "JUMP!" I do not reply with how high, I just jump.
Paladin[NL]
member
157 posts
56 snarkmarks
Registered: May 4th 2004
Location: Netherlands

Occupation: Student/mapper
Posted by NameWithHeld on Tue Nov 29th at 11:58am 2005
NameWithHeld
member
51 posts
5 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 26th 2004
Location: Out the back of woop woop, Aus

Occupation: Super Secret Special Forces
Posted by fishy on Tue Nov 29th at 3:09pm 2005
science has already created new forms of life through tampering with DNA. frost resistant wheat because it has fish DNA etc, so don't think that ID is a non-starter, because we're doing it ourselves now.
Paladin, ID is a term that i imagined would cover ANY creation theory, yours included. or did god not show any intelligence in his design of the universe?
Posted by Underdog on Tue Nov 29th at 4:43pm 2005
science has already created new forms of life through tampering with DNA. frost resistant wheat because it has fish DNA etc, so don't think that ID is a non-starter, because we're doing it ourselves now.
Wheat? You traitorous slimwad. Don't you know by now that the signature grain of choice for most Snarkpit members is RICE! If your going to make an example of nature, pick a more perfect grain. " SRC="images/smiles/icon_lol.gif">
Personally, I am just about tired of near minute pages. ![]()
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Tue Nov 29th at 5:02pm 2005
And seriously, this thread is only six pages and it took:
SnarkPower made this page in 92.142 seconds
Posted by Underdog on Tue Nov 29th at 5:35pm 2005
And seriously, this thread is only six pages and it took:
SnarkPower made this page in 92.142 seconds
Seriously. Not counting the time it took the page to load for me to SEE your reply, it took over 5 minutes for the subsequent pages to load so I could reply, and now, there is no telling how long this reply will take to post. I am figuring about 7 minutes per post. ![]()
As for the rice thing. I use it as a simple tension breaking measure. This thread is to serious and needs a comic relief moment. Its not heated or anything. Its just to deep for a forum.
I have had discussions with religious people in the past. Its a topic that cannot end on a good note. It may end cordially, but never end well.
Religious people tend to act 3 ways when you discuss things religious.
1) If you pin them down with scientific fact, they will slither away with Gods will that science exists so science is gods will.
2) benignly, if you show scientific proof they will act as if its sad that you cannot see the religious beauty of science. but otherwise not hinder you in any way.
3) denial- there is no science that can ever explain things. ever.
In the end, everyone can only hope that the discussion will end with a parting on good terms in so far as "agreeing to disagree"
Rice on the other hand. Everyone loves rice. If not to eat, then to throw, or make alcohol. Everyone uses rice in some form even if its only the paper they use to smoke with. " SRC="images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif">
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by fishy on Tue Nov 29th at 7:35pm 2005
Posted by Underdog on Tue Nov 29th at 7:55pm 2005
You know, there is absolutely no good way to take a comment like this. Why would you even think of posting it unless, you intend to be an ass?
My viewpoint on religion, is just as valid as anyones. Even if I think that discussing it can come to no good thats no reason to insinuate that I cannot comment any way I please within a public forum and format.
If I think that the discussion needs a breather, I can interpose one any time I feel like it as long as there is no harmful comments in doing so.
Unless, you are suggesting that this thread must remain pure for some reason?
And, you guys say I post without thinking first. ![]()
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by Crono on Tue Nov 29th at 8:17pm 2005
Not saying it's God or anything like that, that's up to whom ever to decide for themselves. But, the more you analyze how things work, the more peculiar everything becomes. It's just too convenient. There is most likely some intelligent design behind it, whether that be a creature or force of some sort or whatever.
It turns out, for a planet to be habitable (by what we would consider life) there are some specific things that need to happen to the planet its self. Then the star of the system needs to be of a specific radiation (main, ours is in the green part of the spectrum mostly ... G2 it the type I think. Something like an M star wouldn't sustain life too red, meaning, it's too cold. If you had a planet close enough to get warm it'd have terrible consequences with gravity and would move veeeeerrrryyyyyy sloooooowwwlllyyyyy around the sun. It would make it so one half of the planet is warm the other half is frozen ... which has some other effects on the atmosphere.)
I honestly don't understand why the general majority of people insist on pitting religion against science (since that very idea is ridiculously flawed).
Chances are if someone does that they probably know very little of either side.
Posted by Underdog on Tue Nov 29th at 9:22pm 2005
I find that the biggest hurdle that man in general cannot overcome is the immense time frames involved when discussing how man got here. Most would like to think themselves capable of envisioning it clearly but the fact is damned few actually can. A good analogy I guess would be one that my teacher used upon us when I was in school. If someone could ask an ant, how long they had been there, the would most likely say, "Always". The tree's, and rocks have been around as long as they can know so in their viewpoint, their world has been around nearly forever. It would be a massive overstatement to say that man is on the same level as an ant in relation to our place in the universe but it does have some basis for contemplation.
Man just cannot wrap his mind around millions upon millions of years of natural selection. The very idea that man cam from a lower order of primate truly makes some cringe. It doesn't matter that most of the scientific evidence says that this is exactly how it happened. These people cannot envision the slow be inevitable actions of natural selection when it comes to how an organism evolves from one stage to the next.
Personally, I have always been of the mind that we are the accident from some mishap eons ago. Some cosmic spaceship dumped their toilets and the blue ice of doom landed on this planet. I do not believe in some higher power governing our progress. I believe that given time we will find life elsewhere (or it will find us) but in effect it will show that life is basically the same everywhere within our realm of the universe.
Our makeup is predominately iron based. Not because iron makes the best building block but because its one of the most common elements available on this burg we call home. I do believe that a metal will probably be a base for all life throughout the galaxy, but whether its iron or not will depend on whats most common on the other worlds.
If there is an entity at work, its not driven by how smart it is, but by how smart we are. Natural selection is the only true power.
Anyway, thats my view.
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Posted by fishy on Tue Nov 29th at 9:54pm 2005
feel free to comment any way you like, there's no special request from me to ask anyone not to post in a discussion i'm involved in, not even Crono.![]()
you may have noticed that i'd ignored the insult in your earlier post, prefering to let it be what you now claim it to be, some sort of attempt at lightening the thread. maybe that's all it was intended as. however, and this is what my response was aimed at, if you further reasoned that the thread was destined to end in tears, and you took it upon yourself to attempt to derail it before that happened, then i'm sure there's no need to repeat myself.
Posted by Crono on Tue Nov 29th at 9:55pm 2005
Iron is important however. But so is hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen (want to talk about a weird ass atom, nitrogen.)
Another plausible base is silicon, except it's impossibly hard to separate silicon from oxygen once they attach. Carbon, however, attaches to oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen fairly easily (By the way, removing oxygen from a C-O setup, making it C-H is how we gain energy from food. Plants make the C-O combination from direct sunlight, which "traps" energy in the bond. Our digestive track simply releases it and we get that energy.)
Anything we would consider life would most likely be carbon based. That's not to say they'd look like us or something like that.
It was something like a distance of 0.9 - 1.3 Atu planet's distance from a moderate sized star for it to inhabitable. Closer would be too hot and farther away would be too cold (Venus and Mars respectively).
It's really interesting if you look at a planet like Venus, because the abundance of elements is almost the same as Earths, so is the size of the planet. It was just too warm.
But, all of this is just talking about the actual ability for something like life to be created (and I wasn't talking about OUR lives being governed. I'm talking about the entire system that exists in our universe).
You have to consider the possibility that if there are other beings out there that they may have never had the need for something like mathematics (or whatever they would potentially call it) We developed math to show self worth through possessions. Even cultures on our planet (like in Fiji) only have a slight concept of counting: 1, 2, many.
That part is a completely different discussion, since it is a social science type topic.
One more thing. Even saying that there's such a thing as "natural selection" is implying that there is a force. When in all actuality ... there could be none ... so ... saying you believe there's no force then saying there is one is really flawed. As far as I can tell, this is done simply for people to understand it and identify it. We always assign "forces" and people to arbitrary events.
However, I don't that it isn't actually like that. But then, nobody does. I think that's the point though. That's also why it's a matter of personal choice and belief.
Posted by Nickelplate on Wed Nov 30th at 1:29am 2005
I ahve a book called "Case for a Creator."
It's about a guy that goes out trying to prove his christian wife wrong so she will stop going to church because he's and Atheist and it makes him mad. He ends up finding out that just about everything he was taught about Evolution was a big fake and that the main things he had always used as proofs of evolution (as opposed to creationism) were outdated or completely false. It's a great book that lays down the scientific facts, not just untraceable addages and stuff like you normally hear. It's cool. In the book it not only says a lot of what Crono just said, but that the earth has a PERFECTLY round orbit, and all the other planets have elliptical orbits. If the earth had an ellitpical orbit, the earth would fry for half the year, and freeze the other half.
we don't know of any other planet with plate tectonics, either. Without plate tectonics, there would be no land and this would be a salt-saturated WaterWorld. Just a dead sphere of water... That would suck.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Crono on Wed Nov 30th at 1:47am 2005
If they didn't there'd be no atmosphere now. Jupiter is the only planet in our system that was large enough to keep its (supposed) original atmosphere. The current atmospheres are secondary atmospheres.
Earth's orbit is elliptical around the sun, the axis is tipped though (what 46? or something like that). The moon has a round orbit around the Earth though.
The reason(s) why the Earth doesn't fry: 1) Covered in water, water is a wondrous liquid that can absorb massive amounts of energy and stay the same temperature (Ever wonder why you can bring water to a boil so fast ... but it takes forever to evaporate?) Rock, doesn't have this property, which is why something like the moon has such extreme temperatures (this doesn't mean the moon landing is a hoax, there are explanations on how those astronauts didn't die. They are true, also) 2) We have a large amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. It acts like a blanket and keeps a lot of heat in ... and IR/UV out. (This is the reason why you can't melt lead on the surface of Venus. There's a very thick blanket on the planet from CO2 and Sulferic Acid clouds.)
If we didn't have plate tectonics ... I don't think there'd be much water to speak of.
Posted by Underdog on Wed Nov 30th at 2:12am 2005
you may have noticed that i'd ignored the insult in your earlier post,
My deepest apologies. I was told that light blue meant humor. It won't happen again.
and yes, "Carbon" not Iron. Swap out the word please.
Underdog
member
1018 posts
102 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 12th 2004
Location: United States

Occupation: Sales-Construction
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 1.0141 seconds.

