Posted by Dark Tree on Sat Feb 4th at 8:24am 2006
Dark Tree
member
646 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: USA

Occupation: DigiPen student
Posted by French Toast on Sat Feb 4th at 4:10pm 2006
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Y2kBen_2000 on Sun Feb 5th at 7:05am 2006
Also, I wasn't insisting on a debate over whether gwil should reopen the thread. I just wanted to see see if simple copyright education would spike an intersting thread.
Come to think of it "I've Created A MONSTER!!!" . . .
or perhaps just an interesting little debacle. You be the judge.
ha, video pirates? what about the rising space pirate problem, anybody gonna gripe about them?
Y2kBen_2000
member
167 posts
97 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 5th 2004
Location: Texas
Occupation: Student: Game Simulation Programming
Posted by Myrk- on Sun Feb 5th at 10:21am 2006
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by Orpheus on Thu Feb 9th at 12:28am 2006
Disclaimer: For the newer folks here abouts I would like to clarify my views and position as in reference to this happy site known collectively as "The Snarkpit"
I support the owner and administrative staff 100% in all aspects were the set rules and guidelines are concerned. I may not agree with some/many/a few of them, but I do respect them. I may try, with time, to alter them to be more broad in scope, but I will not actively show disdain for them. I may oppose any owner or admin in a subject, but not where it clashes with a rule. The sanctity of this site is paramount. Since I was a part of its current state, it would look odd to publicly disdain what I helped to enact.
Since this topic has finally cooled off a bit, I think now would be a good time to have my say:
Why is it wrong to change the format of a song?
Well Master Dave, since you and I have been friends since LONG before there was even a Snarkpit, I can only assume that your post was rhetorically based. You are perfectly aware of my thoughts on copy rights.
Lets assume for the sake of argument that making a backup of any DVD is wrong. Since there is nearly the exact same law applied to music, specifically songs, then by that thinking, making a copy/backup of a song is wrong as well. Anyone who sees any distinction between DVDs and MP3's is only fooling themselves. If one's thinking is:
a) Making a song into an MP3 is OK because you are only listening to it through your player for your own personal pleasure. How is that any different than viewing a movie using your own player?
b) Making an MP3 is more accepted because, MP3 players were specifically designed to PLAY THEM! Well I hate to say this, any DVD player will play any backup, assuming you use the proper blanks so, that still doesn't hold up.
c) That more people use MP3's than backed up DVDs? I doubt it but how does that make it more/less right/wrong?
d) That some songs are specifically SOLD in MP3 format. I can see this as a viable excuse but only in so far as you actually bought it pre converted into the format. If for any reason you actually converted a music CD into MP3, you are doing the exact same thing as anyone making a backup of ANY COPY RIGHTED MATERIAL!
Anyway, thats how I see it. So, if this thread truly is to define what IS ALLOWED to be posted here, and what IS NOT, then if we accept DVD backup as not allowed, then by association we are saying that anything in reference to making MP3's from music disks as same.
/ my point.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.

