Throughout history, being mad at something has been a predominantly irrational action. Understanding why someone is mad, is not a necessity to its existence.
There are however warning signs when its happening. Learning those warning signs is probably a good idea.
Fishman and I used to argue often. We do not really argue much anymore, at least I assume we don't because we seem to have learned each other signs.
Most recently, when I slipped up and said "I am a law abiding citizen it seems" What actually meant was, I have not gotten into trouble and had to go to court or jail. He tactfully pointed out my error and, I caught it. I knew he was tweaked slightly for my apparent slip of the tongue and being a liar.
My point is, telling me that I really have no reason to be mad is only infuriating the situation. It doesn't matter if you meant to make me mad. Thats bound to happen. Telling me its stupid to be mad is not winning you any points I promise you.
When I said I couldn't believe you typed that out loud. That was warning #1.
When I told you I needed to bow out that was the last warning.
This is not a majority rules situation people. Telling me in many different ways how childish I am for being mad is only creating more tension.
Anyway. learn from this.
I know I piss a lot of people off very often, but I try to stop before it reaches critical mass. I do not often succeed but I try.
Morph, I am not real keen on the idea of people telling me to shut up. And telling me that my complicating something with realism is telling me to shut up.
It may not have been meant that way, but i took it as such.
Crono... I read what you wrote, honest I did but I still am not understanding your point. Nothing new there I suppose.
nite-nite all.
