? quoting Gwil
It seems like an awful lot of the hostility is actually imagined to me.
If by "flame wars" people mean "heated discussions" - we've had those at the Snarkpit for a very, very long time.
Quoted for truth.
Now, some might say that "I", meaning Orph, should be the very last person to be contrary to this but IMO, most of the heat is imaginary. Sure, we have heated topics, but none of the newest members seem to remember the REAL hostility of Snarkpits beginnings. Nothing, and I mean nothing compares to some of our truly explosive threads of 3 or 4 years ago.
In all honesty, I look forward, and in some cases incite a topic because it seems to be stalling. IMO, a good hearty debate can be enlightening. Look at it like this. If you cannot handle a relatively benign confrontation in a forum where REAL damage to you is nearly impossible to achieve, how are you going to handle an "in your face" ordeal in real life?
I am not saying that you will have to deal with physically violent ordeals, I have not had a real fist fight in over 20 years, but there are ordeals that are of the non-violent nature that can rip your asshole clear out and leave you bloody for years. (Metaphorically speaking guys)
Most of you people who always cry for a topic to calm down, or want one locked, or even claim that there is to much violence may need to reassess your situations a bit.
There is nothing wrong with being a pacifist. I think its a truly warriors opinion to be one. If you disagree, try being the only calm one in a fist fight. But constantly crying about how horrible it is in here is simple crybabiness. There simply isn't enough hatred to warrant a "boy who cried wolf" mentality.
My advice, if you are still reading my words is: Stand back and allow the chips to fall once in a while.
@Fish.. I miss the old Fish. We had much more fun as adversaries than buddies. 