Posted by G4MER on Sat Mar 18th at 3:25pm 2006
What are your thoughts..
I think my catch line below the topic says it best.
Posted by OtZman on Sat Mar 18th at 5:21pm 2006
Trailer
Looks like a nice flick. Anyone seen it?
As for the terrorist thing, I think what you said sounds pretty reasonable.
OtZman
member
1890 posts
199 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 12th 2003
Location: Sweden

Occupation: Student
Posted by Windows 98 on Sat Mar 18th at 6:41pm 2006
Windows 98
member
757 posts
86 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 25th 2005
Location: USA

Occupation: Student
Posted by Gwil on Sat Mar 18th at 6:46pm 2006
Besides that, the comic is way older than mainstream Islamic fundamentalism, so had little or no bearing on events pertaining to the 2001 attacks on America. Judge the movie on its merits as a film and a conversion to screen from an old (and excellent) DC Comic story, nothing more.
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Crono on Sat Mar 18th at 10:40pm 2006
I love V for Vendetta. There were things that were changed in the adaptation to make it more "current", but, it still stands as blatant fiction. If you see the context of the G.Novel/Film, it makes much more sense. It doesn't approve terrorism, but rather reclaiming your own rights. (U.S. Revolutionary War, would be a proper comparison)
If someone does Watchmen right, I'll be very happy ... but ... the content matter is so f**king close to 9/11 even though it was written 20 years before 2001. People will no doubt make that connection because it's the only thing they can see. As a whole, audiences lack the ability to see a film for more than face value, that's something that's bugged me for a long time.
Fox and CNN are by far credible news sources anymore. That and, they're playing on this idea as a tactic. Nothing more.
Also, EVERYONE who knows this wonderful story have known for over a year (or so) that people would react this way, simply because of the core content matter.
Posted by rs6 on Sat Mar 18th at 11:02pm 2006
rs6
member
640 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 31st 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA

Occupation: koledge
Posted by Dark Tree on Sun Mar 19th at 1:03am 2006
V For Vendetta: 8/10. It was a really solid and quite inspirational if you can look past the improbability of a lot of it. It was a really kickass flick with intelligent dialogue by 'V'....also, I was unaware of it till I looked on IMDB, but Hugo Weaving (Agent Smith) plays the role of 'V'...also...the script was written by the Wachowski Brothers (Matrix trilogy) about 9 years before The Matrix came out.....The Matrix....Wachowski's....Agent Smith....Hugo Weaving...V.....there are no coincidences (also a them in the movie
And yes, back on topic....while watching it I became aware of how it was like pro-terrorist.......I thought it was rather humorous, as most movies are the opposite. I wouldnt call the movie groundbreakign in any way, but definately a fun romp. Kinda reminded me of:
Show spoiler
I would recommend dis moveh.
Dark Tree
member
646 posts
144 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: USA

Occupation: DigiPen student
Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Sun Mar 19th at 2:49am 2006
Posted by Nickelplate on Sun Mar 19th at 3:30am 2006
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by FatStrings on Sun Mar 19th at 5:27am 2006
in section 802 I have copied it from the document
the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--
`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
`(B) appear to be intended--
`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
`(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
`(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
`(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.'.
so i am a terrorist
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Nickelplate on Sun Mar 19th at 6:29am 2006
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by FatStrings on Sun Mar 19th at 6:31am 2006
by our governments standards if you get a speading ticket you are a terrorist
but only if you're in the united states
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Nickelplate on Sun Mar 19th at 6:37am 2006
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by FatStrings on Sun Mar 19th at 6:40am 2006
just playin
but yeah that was retarded, and that was only 1 of the 2 they tried to pass
they are trying to take our rights and our ignorant citizens are supporting them because they're to stupid to think about what is happening
FatStrings
member
1242 posts
132 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 11th 2005
Location: USA
Occupation: Architecture Student
Posted by Nickelplate on Sun Mar 19th at 6:45am 2006
oh boy... I just can't wait for the Reich!!
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by French Toast on Mon Mar 20th at 3:59am 2006
French Toast
member
3043 posts
300 snarkmarks
Registered: Jan 16th 2005
Location: Canada

Occupation: Kicking Ass
Posted by Cassius on Mon Mar 20th at 7:10am 2006
I wondered after I saw the movie as to what we're supposed to take away from it. Perhaps I only have this perspective because I live in the Bay Area and am regularly exposed to liberal ideas over the internet, but it seems to me that the gist of it - all that rebellion and never give up your individuality and all that - is pretty played out.
I really liked the Matrix because it adressed issues of individuality versus "the system" and eventually got past that: Revolutions questions the value of individual identity, asks what it is and what it means, rather than taking it as something grand and romantic to fight for.
V was a good movie. The explanation of the backstory was kind of patchy: it wasn't given to us as a string of clues leading up to a realization of what really went on, but in awkward chunks, some more significant or relevant than others. Other elements seemed a little too simplistic: Portman's character is extremely credulous and naive, and that V "fell in love with her" seems very token - it doesn't really fit except in the sense that we're watching a Hollywood movie, and somebody has to fall in love with somebody in a Hollywood movie. The assistant to the High Chancellor or whatever the office was actually taking the Chancellor to V was stupid. And overall, stepping back from the romanticism of the characters and wondering for a minute what V really accomplished by destroying the government and himself in a grand act of martyrdom: who will lead the nation? Who will actually give out the vaccine that apparently infected the rest of the world? Now that Portman no longer has a government to fight - one that she was conditioned to fight and built her whole life around fighting - what will she do?
Sadly, V for Vendetta doesn't really consider such questions. It espouses a romantic revolutionary spirit that does not pause to consider practical or realistic concerns. That isn't a problem with the film as a piece of art - that's a problem with the fact that it encourages the audience to adopt the anti-authoritarianism it puts across, though of course not in such an extreme fashion as V does - and a problem with the fact that people do and will buy that philosophy or something similar.
Posted by Bewbies on Mon Mar 20th at 4:14pm 2006
maybe when they adapt The Green Lantern it'll live up to your philosphy-injecting-movie standards, cass. =P
..or maybe it'll be another adaptation of a 20-year-old DC comic. meh
Bewbies
member
413 posts
41 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 10th 2003
Location: US-of-A

Occupation: IT Dude
Posted by Jinx on Mon Mar 20th at 5:23pm 2006
It's a great graphic novel, I'm going to see the movie this afternoon. I don't think you have to consider V to be a hero necessarily. While the government in Vendetta is corrupt and evil, I don't think the story necessarily pushes the idea that V himself is "good". He's monstrous in his own ways.
The Watchmen was fantastic, one of my favorite stories ever.
----------------------------
but in a way, didn't V *totally* give up his individuality to his cause?
I think the problem is that everyone wants to see this as purely good vs evil and whatnot. If you've read other stuff by Moore like Watchmen you would understand that he likes to play with ideas of morality, and with ideas of whether doing terrible things toward a good end is justified. Moore has written stories where the bad guys *win*, and possibly for the best, so don't try to look at Vendetta as a black and white, good vs evil story because it certainly is not.
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0167 seconds.

