? quoting Gwil

63kb for a 4/5 colour small jpg? You should be ashamed

I am, truly.

I had it down to 30k but the damned yellow wouldn't show right/correctly.

I dunno what it is about yellow but XAT failed me.

*whispers*

I do try to set some sort of an example. I am truly sorry.

Be overly dependent on XAT?

I dunno bud. For starters, I didn't look at anyone else's so I was surprised when Gwil pointed it out.

My 30k version was dull and blurry.

My un-Xat version was 146k, so... Go figure.

I am curious to know how the others got their yellow so good.

If its a legit method, I would like to add it to the Image tutorial I have... With permission of course.

Weird. PNGs are notoriously larger than JPGs.

For the record, I didn't see any link but.. I didn't look very hard. Lesson learned I guess.

Clearly, I am over dependent on XAT.

Its nice to know, since I always heard that PNGs were notoriously high file sizes. Makes sense that they would have their niche since they were created for some purpose.

I don't use them because I was told they are bad.. I must have been slightly misinformed.

As I said, I never looked at the other screens and was surprised when Gwil pointed it out.

PNGs must handle yellow better.

Lesson learned.