I was on TWHL last week and some people were saying that nobody should discriminate against anyone's sexual preference. They said since I am intolerant of homosexuality, that I am a bigot and should be classified with nazis. Then I told them that Pedophilia, bestiality, (and necrophilia) are sexual preferences too, and that they are just as valid as the main two. Yet society discriminates against them and nobody says anything about it. Now, I understand that all three of those are completely disgusting and everyone knows it but the people doing them. But 50 years ago, so was homosexuality. Do you think that these sexual preferences will be accepted some day just like homosexuality? What are your thoughts on this matter? Either all of them must be un-discriminated-against or none.
Posted by Nickelplate on Tue Apr 25th at 12:43am 2006
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by ReNo on Tue Apr 25th at 1:05am 2006
ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Apr 25th at 1:10am 2006
Nickel. I don't think that its possible to have an "All encompassing" sexual thread. The ideals of pleasurable sex, or even popular sex is just to vast.
I personally do not see a thread of this type having a resolvable discussion.
That doesn't mean that I feel that you should not have posted it, or that you will be bashed for doing so. I just feel that the scope is to large to be placed in one discussion.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Crono on Tue Apr 25th at 1:19am 2006
Reno hit the nail on the head. In addition to that, though. Disregarding pedophilia and incest there's a pretty standard "not outside the species" rule. Screwing your dog will probably never be accepted, for instance ... even if the dog is ready and willing ... gross.
But, there are plenty of sexual preferences allows already! Old and young people get it on together all the time. So do large and little people, short and tall ... etc. I think, homosexuality was one of the last "alright, I can understand that and I need to respect your right to do it" type of things left. Anything beyond that ... you're either harming someone, or it really is a mental condition. Wanting to screw your sister isn't normal. Neither is oogling your 5 year old daughter's friend's little brother. There's just things that are not okay, especially because in most situations, it is not mutual.
That's my take on it.
Posted by Spartan on Tue Apr 25th at 9:59am 2006
I don't understand why you even go to that place. I f**king hate TWHL.
end rant/
Now as Reno stated there is a difference because kids, animals, and corpses are not consenting adults. However I would condone the actions of a necrophile long before I ever would of a peadophile. You don't cause psychological and physicle harm to a corpses. They're already dead.
Now as for Nickleplate I think your beliefs are just fine. If you don't accept homosexuality that's just fine. You don't have to accept if you don't want to. Just don't go around beating up gay or bi people now.
There are even cases where girls will act bisexual at a school to try and attract more guys.
Posted by reaper47 on Tue Apr 25th at 11:23am 2006
It's like saying "I don't tolerate infertile people!" or "I don't tolerate people who like brunettes!" Completely pointless.
You're comparing homosexuality (the love between two men) with perverse sexual acts with non-willing participants. That's rather bigot in my eyes. To be honest I don't know many homosexuals and their way of talking makes my ears ring. But I tolerate them. I don't see any reason why not to. The word tolerate means to me to accept someone else to be what he is. I don't know if there again is some weird shift of meaning in the English definition of the word but I don't think so. Please tell me a reason someone should not tolerate homosexuals?
Posted by Nickelplate on Tue Apr 25th at 1:23pm 2006
The only thing that says children cannot consent is society. The same society that is being decried for not allowing gay marriages. And you're not HURTING animals and corpses, just like gays aren't hurting anyone.
[edit] i don't beat up gays, lol. I like the PEOPLE for the most part. But what they do is abominable.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by ReNo on Tue Apr 25th at 2:10pm 2006
ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by Nickelplate on Tue Apr 25th at 2:16pm 2006
Animals are my property. Animals have no rights... whatsoever.
Dead people are akin to dirt. No rights, no consent age, only a "best if necro'd by" date.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Tue Apr 25th at 2:26pm 2006
Pvt.Scythe
member
730 posts
113 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 19th 2004
Location: Finland

Occupation: student
Dystopia - Empires
Posted by reaper47 on Tue Apr 25th at 2:37pm 2006
Dead people are akin to dirt. No rights, no consent age, only a "best if necro'd by" date.
Isn't there a law against cruelty to animals? Also dead people aren't akin to dirt to their relatives.
The difference is that homosexuals can and do agree to have sex with their partners which in the other cases is either impossible or questionable. I'd even agree with you on homosexual acts being unpleasant to imagine for heterosexuals but that still doesn't explain why you wouldn't tolerate it.
Is it something religious?
Posted by Dred_furst on Tue Apr 25th at 2:42pm 2006
Homosexuality is on different terms completetly, it is mutually agreed (hope thats the right word) and is accepted in most countries (like the UK) by 9 out of 10 people, i.e. most will. you may not like some of the stuff that goes through said people's heads or dont understand why it happens, but thats perfectly fine, as long as you dont try to stop what happens. Thats when it becomes wrong to discriminate.
Overall think what you like, but think again before you act on it. acting on its different.
Posted by Nickelplate on Tue Apr 25th at 2:49pm 2006
It isn't cruelty, it's LOVE!
And you don't TELL thier families, or else you use corpses related to you.
And yeah, I am very devout in my beleifs. I don't like the word "religious' because a religion is a bunch of people all doing the same things instead of thier own personal beliefs. I have my own personal belefs that are not necessarily that of any one organized church. but anyway, I have more than just religious reasons for not liking homosexuality as a concept.
- I personally believe that it is an abomination to my God.
- It goes against what is natural for every animal including humans, Largely a waste of time and effort, not to mention a thorn in the side of our current relations laws system. Don't you think we have more important things to worry about than whether gays can marry instead of "civil unions," or whatever. There are terrorist-funding countries that call us "the great satan" that are refining uranium and jacking up oil prices. There is hunger and poverty all over the world and even in our own country and we have the stylish citizens of San Francisco complaining that they can't "legitimize" thier unnatural relationships.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Gollum on Tue Apr 25th at 6:08pm 2006
It goes against what is natural for every animal including humans, Largely a waste of time and effort, not to mention a thorn in the side of our current relations laws system. Don't you think we have more important things to worry about than whether gays can marry instead of "civil unions," or whatever. There are terrorist-funding countries that call us "the great satan" that are refining uranium and jacking up oil prices. There is hunger and poverty all over the world and even in our own country and we have the stylish citizens of San Francisco complaining that they can't "legitimize" thier unnatural relationships.
What is natural behaviour? Presumably it is the behaviour of animals (whereas humans, being more sophisticated, can do "unnatural" things).
Many species of animals are well-documented to behave homosexually. Often it's used as a form of status determination: the dominant animal does the buttf*cking, whereas the submissive gets buttf*cked. Homosexual behaviour is also observed in captive animals where females are absent. Animals have even been known to mate with their food bowls.
Note that masturbation is similarly "natural" in many species.
The rest of your post is irrelevant, not to mention insularly neo-conservative. You cannot dismiss the importance of a topic by comparing it to world hunger.
Here's a thought: if most of the heterosexual population were suddenly "struck gay", and became homosexual, then the world's population would decline. Once the population had reduced to, say, less than a billion, we wouldn't have any environmental problems any more ![]()
I can see the posters already:
"Save the world -- bugger a man today!"
"Bend over for the environment."
(And yes, I know that's silly. But it does make you wonder about "natural".)
Gollum
member
1268 posts
207 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 26th 2001
Location: Oxford, England

Occupation: Student
Posted by reaper47 on Tue Apr 25th at 6:11pm 2006
Homosexuals have been terrorized in every phsychological and physical way for ages (and in some places still today). Now, since a few years, people are starting to accept them. Why do you want to ruin that for these people? That's exactly what you do by shouting out your accusations all over the net. It's pretty cruel towards those people who are completely innocent. It's not just a characteristic for them, it's an essential part of their life.
A personal belief that it is an abomination to somebody's God doesn't justify the discrimination of a group of people with harmless, slightly twisted sexual preferences. My personal belief, for example, is that they should not be discriminated.
Also I do not see any relation between homosexual rights and the time spent to prevent terrorism and poverty. Gay marriage is mainly a method to make it easier for homosexuals to clarify certain legal questions in relationships. You don't raise the number of homosexuals through that anyway, you just make it easier for them to live their lifes which I think is something positive and humane.
Posted by Gwil on Tue Apr 25th at 6:21pm 2006
I'll stand this one out and stick pins in my eyes I think.
Gwil
super admin
2864 posts
293 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 13th 2001
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Occupation: Student
Posted by Toast King on Tue Apr 25th at 6:22pm 2006
I used to be on TWHL, but then they banned me for unknown reasons, they
said I 'spammed' - which is when I just said things in the shout-box like 'Hi" or 'Im working on a map'. The site is now 100% idiots who just flame and argue, never EVER go into their IRC channel.
Posted by Nickelplate on Tue Apr 25th at 7:46pm 2006
Well I've seen pedophilia and necrophilia in nature too, so is it natural? And if we can't compare ourselves to animals, who use animals as justification for what we can or can't do?
Personally, I just think that people want to do whatever they want to do and they will always do it, ANd search until they have a way to justify it, no matter what. I also think that people will defend other people for doing whatever they want, because if they admit that another person is wrong, they might have to admit that they are. Otherwise, why would such straight people even care how homosexuals are treated, as long as it doesn't interfere with their OWN hedonism?
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Andrei on Tue Apr 25th at 8:15pm 2006
PETA.
Posted by Orpheus on Tue Apr 25th at 9:13pm 2006
I'll stand this one out and stick pins in my eyes I think.
I agree, minus the pins methinks.
I have but one comment. Mankind is born with a plethora of things most can be termed "Good" and "Bad"
I have heard the tired argument about how Homosexuals have no choice in the matter. They are "born" the way they are. I won't even add the sigh in this post, but be aware that it is present while you are reading these words.
Homosexuals may, or may not have a choice in being born the way they are, but they do have a choice whether to "ACT" upon those urges. It is commonly thought that pedophilia, alcoholism,kleptomania, and a whole s**t load of other ailments are born traits. This may or may not be true, but the real truth of the matter is, as responsible adults, you ARE responsible if you do not reign in the urges of these diseases.
I do not want to hear the argument that you cannot compare an illegal action to one that is not illegal because the terms do not apply in this conversation. Kleptomania,alcoholism,homosexuality and all the rest of the supposed "Born" traits are wrong and should not be acted upon... Thats the bottom line of it.
Myself, I do not believe in the born theory. I firmly, and whole heartedly believe that all these actions.. ALL OF THEM, are learned traits. You learn to steal, you learn to burn down buildings, you learn to be gay, you learn them all.
Education and consequences for acting upon them will be the only real deterrent. If no one ever has to pay the piper, then no harm is done, right? ![]()
Society has deemed some of these things more wrong than others so, not all of them are considered "Criminal actions" any longer. If you feel that this is basically true, or you feel that this is because they are not all criminal actions, then YOU are the problem more so than the people doing the things we discuss.
anyway, those pins are looking pretty nifty about now... Can I borrow a few from you Master Gwil? And, a bit of mouthwash because topics like this always leave a bad taste in my mouth. 
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0428 seconds.




