Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Sun Jun 11th at 6:06pm 2006
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Jun 11th at 6:42pm 2006
Religion cannot ever be brought into the school system. I am sorry to say that but its a fact that cannot be overlooked.
The reason is, religion is to subjectmental to the whims of the teachers background. Religion would NEVER be taught as an unbiased extension of "Learning"
In the south, baptist reign. In the south that religion would be predominant. Up north, another type would be. See my point?
Religion should be taught fundamentally. Not ever turned into an extension of the local church.
I have voted against religion in school so often that its sickening that these assholes cannot see that its NOT GOIN TO PASS!!
Unless ALL aspects, both good and bad are taught, I say NO f**kIN WAY BUCKO's!
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Addicted to Morphine on Sun Jun 11th at 6:45pm 2006
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Jun 11th at 6:56pm 2006
No. It wouldn't.. Fiction would go against the belief system of the ones who think its true.
If it were taught as an extension of HISTORY, then I'd be happy. The point is, the teachers pick "which" history instead of "ITS" history.
See my point?
[edit] TBH, I cannot stand all this crap NickelPlate writes about but I would never dream of forbidding it from happening. His kind of belief makes me ill. I have met far to many people like him but the point is, they have all the right in the world to believe HOW they see fit.
I cannot imagine myself ever forbidding someone their voice.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Sun Jun 11th at 8:45pm 2006
A lot of people trace parts of American culture back to the Puritans. The Puritans were a highly religious people. Don't you think some understanding of the Bible would help students "connect the dots?" So much literature references the Bible, not to mention its huge effect on history.
What's the Bible's role in the tension between the West and the Middle East? The common high school student has no idea. He/she can't even find Iraq on a map. Madonna only holds significance as a singer to them. It's not freedom to learn, derived from the separation of church and state - it's shameful ignorance.
We should seek to understand the Bible, its strengths and flaws, not to blindside it out of education and ignore its existence. Whether we believe it or not is another story, but it should definitely form some part of the curriculum in public schools, although I doubt it ever will.
Campaignjunkie
member
1309 posts
291 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: West Coast, USA
Occupation: Student
Posted by reaper47 on Sun Jun 11th at 9:25pm 2006
As soon as this would happen fanatic English teachers would use this method to preach the bible in their classes. I don't know. You can read a lot of general meaning from the bible but it still tells you that there was a guy called Jesus who healed the people with his bare hands and made water into whine. This can be read as metaphors but it's still glorification, thus a work of propaganda that cannot be taught without teaching religion in general. Especially not to children/teenagers.
The only moral/ethical values I have no problem with being taught in schools are the Human Rights. As long as you don't kill or hurt anyone and leave others their personal freedom people should form their picture of the world outside the school.
Posted by Orpheus on Sun Jun 11th at 9:37pm 2006
There is plenty of literature with good moral value. We do not need to resort to biblical versions to establish a guideline with.
If religion isn't taught as a history value subject, it doesn't belong in schools. Period.
As for the bible in general. Its to specific to be of use. It doesn't allow for many other religions to be compared to.
Until they can assure me that religion would be taught as a historical subject, the answer will forever remain, NO!
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Nickelplate on Sun Jun 11th at 11:55pm 2006
No. It wouldn't.. Fiction would go against the belief system of the ones who think its true.
But treating it any OTHER way would go against the ones who DONT beleive it. no matter what you do, you will always disagree with someone. If not, you're just a wishy-washy yes-man.
[edit] TBH, I cannot stand all this crap NickelPlate writes about but I would never dream of forbidding it from happening. His kind of belief makes me ill. I have met far to many people like him but the point is, they have all the right in the world to believe HOW they see fit.
I cannot imagine myself ever forbidding someone their voice.
You're just upset because someone has come up with a perfectly logical way of beleiving. You want to beleive that there is nothing to what we say, you want to beleive that we are all stupid following-sheep, but now that there is logic and reason to what we beleive, you just have to get upset. How impotent.
You know that you can not deny anyone thier voice NOW because that would make you a hypocrite. I do thank your majesty for so graciously allowing one such as me to speak freely.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 12th at 12:11am 2006
No. It wouldn't.. Fiction would go against the belief system of the ones who think its true.
But treating it any OTHER way would go against the ones who DONT beleive it.
No it wouldn't. Treating it as fiction would harm everyone. Believers and non-believers alike.
You have two views, those that believe and those who don't. Fiction would deny believers, and history would deny no one. Treating it "as" fiction would benefit no one either so your point is invalid.
I removed the rest of your post, it was all crap anyway. Sadly, an entire post having one sentace worth a s**t.![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 12th at 1:03am 2006
Before someone falsely assumes that I am once again picking on Nickel, let me explain that its not him, but ALL religious nuts. There is no singling out process. And yes, its pretty nutty to constantly drone on and on. (case in point.. image sizes) No one seems to hesitate to think "Dammit won't he ever stop whining"
So yeah, I have some insight on nuts. ![]()
The main point I cannot tolerate is when people assume that "Religious=good" and as such, no one can possibly complain about a "good" thing.
This is an absolutely horrible way to determine what you will ignore.
Meat is considered by most to be good, but I doubt that a vegetarian would like someone to drone on incessantly about the virtues of eating animals. Ice cream is good, if you ignore the lactose intolerant among us. Honey suckle smells great but be forced to smell it all day and see if you can stand it.
The point is, when you cannot see the warning signs, which in this case is the constant droning about the virtues of faith, then you really need to wake up.
Religion has its perks. Even I see them but they are far from good enough to go on about every single post. Even every 10th post would be far to often. No other subject known to be posted here has so many entries.
Yes, I can ignore them for a while. We all can but the signs are there, heed them.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by parakeet on Mon Jun 12th at 1:18am 2006
i obviously don't frequent the pit enough.. i missed reading nearly all of them v___v .
i believe the light should be Shown to all , it is their choice to follow or not. Religion and love are DIRECT results of free will , and to remove it would be going against everything we believe.
i sometimes wish the best decision for me would be already decided for me .. but then i wouldn't have the same amount of faith that i have today. If we've learned anything from this thread .. it's that each person is entitled to his own say ...... but there is only one truth ..... and that's for us to find out...
Those that stop looking.. have already given up on everything..
Be it science, or be it god .. We must find the Grand theory.
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
www.arclan.net
Posted by Nickelplate on Mon Jun 12th at 3:46am 2006
Orpheus, we all know there are good and bad things about religion, just as there are good and bad things about anything else.
The difference is that religion has been crammed down so many people's throats for so long that they just want to be free of it and all the annoyances associated with it. Nobody wants to be told how to live by someone they don't trust. If you don't beleive in God, why the heck would you want to do what he says, right? I mean look at the child-molesting priests, the killers claiming that "God told them to kill," the nuts bombing abortion clinics with signs that say "thou shallt not kill."
There are lots of times when you see the imperfect people who represent God, and you don't see any good in religion. I understand it, beleive me; I'm disgusted with plenty of my fellow beleivers. I guess my whole point is, many times it takes a lot of effort on your part to be able to beleive in God. It took me 15 years to get to this point of strength in my faith.
Which brings me to another point. After 15 years of searching and researching (although the first few were as a child) it is just a bit insulting when some... guy tries to write you off as a psycho who beleives in fairies and unicorns.
For all I know, this guy is just going off of the Ned Flanderses and religious nuts he sees on TV. Now I know Orpheus has had a bit more experience than that, but some of our younger members seem to just hear something from some propaganda source and repeat it. That should not be enough to invalidate someone's life's work.
Nickelplate
member
2770 posts
327 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 23rd 2004
Location: US

Occupation: Prince of Pleasure
http://www.dimebowl.com
Posted by reaper47 on Mon Jun 12th at 10:24am 2006
Because you said my view of Christians is distored in another post I feel spoken to. So I wanted to say that I don't think that today there's any propaganda against religion outside some communist regimes. There are news about religion gone nuts in TV (Al Qaida, Creationists, Mohammed caricartures, people voting for Bush because he goes to church and not because of his politics ect.) which are sad facts but no more propaganda than some news about the new pope or missionaries helping the poor. I never saw a banner saying "abandon god" or "religion is a lie, leave the church!". But I've seen a lot of "propaganda" (this can be a case for word a definition) from the church itself. In a local, very common newspaper there is one page in every issue written by a bishop. The visit of the pope in Germany was a week-long major event praised in all media. The Passion of the Christ made millions as did Jesus Christ Superstar. I'm living next to a big church, listening to the bells every hour. The next chuch is a hundered meter down the street. Yesterday there was a "night of the churches" where you could visit famous churches in the city, pray and even watch football during nightly events.
I don't think there is any reason for Christianity to to take the offensive. It has to accept that it's a way of living equal to Atheism or any other religion. And inferior to science when it comes to objectivity! And it has a power that must be controlled. It's not just praying and feel-good messages. It is for people taking a peaceful, tolerant approach but you can't just say the negative impact of religion on our society is just propaganda and things we saw on TV. It took a while before a critical program such as the Simpsons became accepted. Before hardly anyone dared to criticise overly devout lifestyles.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 12th at 11:49am 2006
I have a brother. He had (its assumed had) a serious drug problem. He nearly died from it.
Some nutcase turned him onto God. Do you know what its like to have to force him to stop preaching? I cannot be nice and say "Matt, give it a rest today please" or " Matt, did'ja hear the one about..."
He just cranks it up to the next level. Because he had no will power when it came to drugs, it seems that he has no will power where it comes to politeness either.
He literally cannot comprehend someone not associating "Religion=good"
*sighs*
I see him less than once a year now because he has no off button to press. " SRC="images/smiles/sad.gif">
Nickel, his conviction is every bit as strong as yours and, he has 10 times more motivation to succeed at his vocation. Can you not wonder why I get annoyed?
As far as your propaganda theory, I see no signs of it. In fact I notice many points to the contrary. There is a church literally on every street corner and those damnable crosses on every hilltop.
America is so horribly engrossed on this now.
/rant
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Loco on Mon Jun 12th at 1:04pm 2006
I'm aware that there are proportionally a lot more devout Christians in America than in England, so I can't quite identify with Orph's comment about "crosses on every hilltop" and "a church literally on every street corner".
I'm fairly happy with the view that people should have a discussion about religion where they can just say "Okay, I take your point, but look at it this way..." The same applies with teaching about the bible, where currently in RS it is generally taught: "X thought this, but Y said that. There are pros and cons, but its up to you to decide who you agree with".
Either way, I would argue that religion is intensely personal - you can tell from all the different viewpoints demonstrated here. As a result I'm not too keen on the whole banding-together-and-going-nuts sought of thing (sorry to stereotype), but I vaguely see why people do it if they share the same beliefs.
You will notice that the argument proper has only developed now that we're discussing how religion should be treated rather than what you believe, so its nice to see everything's still being treated maturely.
EDIT: Just came across this nice quote on Google Personalised: "As an adolescent I aspired to lasting fame, I craved factual certainty, and I thirsted for a meaningful vision of human life - so I became a scientist. This is like becoming an archbishop so you can meet girls." - M. Cartmill
Apologies to any present archbishops or scientists.
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 12th at 1:16pm 2006
I'll stand back and let a believer certify my words on the crosses and churches then.
There isn't any way they could fib about it I mean and then it will look more like what I said.
You can truly go to some towns and have a church on every corner... Let me rephrase that, "You can stand on certain corners and have a church on the others across from you on each of the other three." I didn't mean that to say that if your town had 100 corners it would have 100 churches. " SRC="images/smiles/sad.gif">
As for the crosses. It seems that every town in America has those 3 wooden constructs now.
I think what bothers me most about them is, if every other religion picked a hilltop one of two things would happen.
1) we'd have millions of symbols.
2) the Christians would revolt and cause a stink. (It seems that only Christian crosses are permitted)
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Posted by Loco on Mon Jun 12th at 1:21pm 2006
Posted by reaper47 on Mon Jun 12th at 2:23pm 2006
Religion and politics however are where this characteristic can go into the negative and lead to a form of fanatism we don't have here in Europe (we have other forms of it).
Posted by parakeet on Mon Jun 12th at 2:31pm 2006
Except in my case i was the nutcase that converted my brother.. and he's happy. Sure he may nag on me every day that i need to read the bible more.. but i think it's loads better than not having anything to live for... which is what he used to have.
I'm obviously not saying you should convert , i'm just saying .. it can be a positive influence on some people ... that really can't find much to live for.
before religion he had suicidal intentions and soforth.. but now they're gone and he has a "Grounding" on life , a foothold for sanity as i should say.
I'm not saying religion is good , or even that the people that teach it are good.. but certainly it can be a really really positive influence on a persons life .. and scince they've felt that , they wanna share it.
parakeet
member
544 posts
64 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 30th 2004
Location: Eastern US

Occupation: n/a
www.arclan.net
Posted by Orpheus on Mon Jun 12th at 3:28pm 2006
I don't fault the intentions 'Keet but, he's the one doing the penance not I. If only there was an off button.
The way I see it, it was his fault he got into drugs, he is the only one who should pay the piper.
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
The best things in life, aren't things.
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0162 seconds.


