A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
locked
Quote
Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
Posted by Gorbachev on Fri Jan 26th at 6:47am 2007


? quote:
? quoting Gorbachev

Yeah, and with the current regulations popping in you'd think the States didn't see the difference between the border up here and down there.

Ahh, so you like that passport thingy then. image

I unlike many other locals (I work at a bank so I see this sort of stuff very, very frequently) have a still-valid passport. But I never use it when going to the States and quick frankly it's retarded. This is nothing more than the usual scare tactics, I mean seriously you make everyone have passports but anyone unscrupulous will just have counterfeit passports anyway and with such a high volume of documents personnel will just be so glossed over seeing them they won't pay attention to the details anymore.

And they try to arm and train the guards like the ones at the Mexican border. Psst...here's a tip, we don't give a s**t about hopping the border; waiting 1-5 cars to talk with a normal human for two seconds is fine for us. Making us wait in lineups to get passports and then bigger lineups so automatons can back up the queue with unnecessary checking of documents does piss people off and the jumpers will still be jumpers. Some good messing up of international relations though, I know lots of people who aren't going to go through the hassle to travel for shopping trips, etc. (And this goes both ways for those who want to get arrogant). Way to screw up tourism for no reason other than political and financial gain in the name of "safety".




Quote
Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
Posted by RedWood on Fri Jan 26th at 7:19am 2007


? quote:

  • Redwood... It was not just that someone dumped some jet-fuel on the floor and it all melted... There was a PLANE that CRASHED into the building. there was an EXPLOSION. The weight from the plane and the concussion from the explosion knocked one floor out, it fell on the next one, and so on and so forth. It's not a conspiracy, it's a plane... and it exploded.[/list]


  • Hay i'm with you. I'm not the one who said the plain wasn't what caused the collapse. Read the earlier posts.

    PS: All ford cars suck!




    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 11:33am 2007


    ? quoting RedWood
    PS: All ford cars suck!

    Cars suck because of their owners, not the other way around.





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by amanderino on Fri Jan 26th at 11:36am 2007


    Right. You can make an awful car good if you know what you're doing. I still don't like American cars, though.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Pvt.Scythe on Fri Jan 26th at 12:00pm 2007


    I'd say some American cars suck, but not all. The ones I've encountered have been quite keen on drinking fuel and not very sturdy(and f**king cold during winter). I guess ecologic fuel consumption isn't the first thing on your minds when your gasoline costs only a fraction of what it does here and I'd also guess that durability isn't an issue there since people are going to change their cars often anyways(they're hell of a lot cheaper there than they are here) and as for the coldness part... Well US of A isn't known for it's extreme winters(for the exception of Alaska and some mountain areas) so I guess that it isn't a priority to make cars that stay warm during winter time.

    My neighbors had a Chrysler Neon for a short while(it had a ton of electrical problems as well as it was noisy and not that great to drive). Now they've got some Honda SUV. What I've noticed that Japanese and European cars survive better out here. I know why European cars survive so well(they're made for the conditions duh), but I can only guess why Japanese cars aren't so kinky in these conditions. And don't even get me started about Fords(I've heard that the FORD acronym stands for Fix Or Repair Daily)...

    Of course opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one!

    Edit: I forgot something extremely important from this post. I apologize any inconvenience caused by this post.



    ''Everyone wades in s**t until they're competent enough to walk on it. Jesus style.''
    Dystopia - Empires



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 12:35pm 2007


    Cars are not inherently borked. Yes, they make lemons but by and large, they aren't made broken.

    However, their owners are. The average grownup now, hasn't a clue on how to properly maintain an automobile. I have owned several cars. Most have in excess of 100,000 miles. The last 4 have in excess of 300,000. My Saturn has 394,000 miles on the odometer, and 760,000 miles on the body. All my auto's are properly maintained though.

    If you have a car, thats not been previously owned, and its broken, its more than likely your fault. Thats not 100% assured, but its more than likely true. If you have a previously owned car and its broken, stop bitching about the car since you are not privy to its history. You cannot in good faith blame it for its woes.

    If you are under 30, the chances are you have NOT the knowledge to make an educated assessment of car brands. You are more than likely just repeating your parents words. There are however exceptions. I am betting NickelPlate knows a few things about cars, and we all know that he is a child in a grown mans body. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/heee.gif">

    But seriously, until you've owned a car from new, don't wad all cars into the "FORD SUCKS ASS" category.





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Flynn on Fri Jan 26th at 1:32pm 2007


    When I was 6 I used to have an insane crush on my dad's Ford Escort. Infact I was so obsessed with Escorts in general that everytime one went I used to exclaim "Ford Escort!". It was the last model before they got replaced by the Focus- 1996 model. But I liked cars in general. I also enjoyed crushing my toy cars. I liked cars so much that I hated them if you know what I mean. I went mad over them- crazy. I would jump at the chance to see a car being crushed whole. I dunno why, I just did.


    Just Kidding

    Just Kidding



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Nickelplate on Fri Jan 26th at 3:00pm 2007


    ? quoting RedWood
    PS: All ford cars suck!

    oh, no you di'in't!

    I'd say of the 3 main car manufacturers in the USA, Ford is the best one. Their business practices lately are very shady/crappy, but their cars are great. REmember: Ford makes Volvo, Land Rover, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Mazda, Lincoln and Mercury. If you say Aston Martin sucks I will purchase a plane ticket to the airport nearest your house, and hijack the plane into your bedroom, planting the starboard engine in your face.

    Edit: Flynn, the british escort is different from the USA escort. The british one started out having quite a bit of class. Not unlike my 1956 British Ford Consul http://consul.dimebowl.com <----very nice. lol




    I tried sniffing coke, but the ice cubes kept getting stuck in my nose.
    http://www.dimebowl.com



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by DocRock on Fri Jan 26th at 3:05pm 2007


    ? quoting RedWood
    ?
    I knew what u meant. I just said that because i couldn't think of a reason why you would say that, but those do should like good reasons to believe what you do. I don't want to stare a debate over this but i wonder what temperature you would have to reach to weaken the beams enough to fail.

    The simple facts of temperatures:

    • 1535ºC (2795ºF) - melting point of iron
    • ~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
    • ~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air - blue flame)

    Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
    Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.

    The fires in the towers were diffuse -- well below 800ºC.
    Their dark smoke showed they were oxygen-starved -- particularly in the South Tower.





    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 3:12pm 2007


    Seems to me that the towers would have a chimney effect, turning them into a flue.. Thereby increasing the heat like in a wood stoves vent pipe.

    Just my thinking though since the stairway in the towers was engulfed in all that fuel.





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by DocRock on Fri Jan 26th at 5:29pm 2007


    ? quoting Orpheus
    Just my thinking though since the stairway in the towers was engulfed in all that fuel.

    Most, if not all, of the fuel burned off directly after impact according to most reports. There is a video of a woman waving from inside the building shortly after impact. If the fire was so hot to melt even the structural steel, then how could she be alive, waving for help inside the cuts in the steel that the planes made when they impacted?

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2005/170105womanwaving.htm





    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Andrei on Fri Jan 26th at 5:41pm 2007


    More Cleese, less 9-11 paranoia. We've had enough of that already.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 5:44pm 2007


    How do planes fall out of the sky at 30,000 feet and 600 mph and people walk away?

    You're asking a question about the exception to the rule. Perhaps you should be thinking about the rule.

    I saw with my own eyes a car that had been hit by an Amtrak train. You know, the 100 mph kind?

    Nothing was left of the car to identify what make it was except the hubcap of one wheel. The driver lived with scratches.

    s**t happens, and theres no conspiracy involved. People naturally want to blame, and its easiest to blame whats closer to home, than something thousands of miles away.

    America, or certain segments of it want to believe that the US government had something to do with the towers falling. Nothings going to stop them from thinking such. But its my belief that the government can sabotage a lot, with a lot less visuals. Seeing the towers fall was pretty well seen. There are things that can do more harm, and no one will notice for years.

    Why do something, everyone would notice, assuming you had the incentive to cause grief?

    Never mind, thats a rhetorical question since you've obviously made up your mind. If you think the US government brought down the towers, then they did.

    /story





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by pepper on Fri Jan 26th at 6:05pm 2007


    I can imagine some sort of involvement of the USA governement, but i did some research a while back that tackled some of the arguments.

    I think it is one of those things that will be uncovered in 60 years.



    RUST Gamedesign
    pepper design

    The strength of the turbulence is directly proportional to the temperature of your coffee.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by reaper47 on Fri Jan 26th at 7:18pm 2007


    John Cleese should have made a comment about these conspiracy theories. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/icon_smile.gif">

    Personally, I think that a big plane crashing into a 300 meter high building creates enough havoc to cause a collapse.






    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 7:32pm 2007


    I was a Combat Engineer in the army, not a structural Engineer so I cannot say for a certainty but, I do know how to blow up a building so I think my guess is better than some.

    The planes crashed just far enough down to cause the upper portion to collapse under its own weight.

    Remember, the second building hit, was the first to fall. It fell first because the hit was further down and more pressure was exerted from above.

    I am not really sure about the construction, but I imagine a few parts were made of aluminum. Ask any Brit about the Hood, and you'll know what happens to aluminum once its heated. (This also assumes that I remember my history about Battleships and powder magazines.)

    Anywho, the buildings fell because of the fire, not the impact. Had the planes had less fuel, the outcome might have been different.

    *shrugs*

    Who knows.





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by RedWood on Fri Jan 26th at 7:52pm 2007


    ? quote:
    The simple facts of temperatures:

    • 1535ºC (2795ºF) - melting point of iron
    • ~1510ºC (2750ºF) - melting point of typical structural steel
    • ~825ºC (1517ºF) - maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air - blue flame)

    Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
    Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.
    The fires in the towers were diffuse -- well below 800ºC.
    Their dark smoke showed they were oxygen-starved -- particularly in the South Tower.


    Ok, but i asked what the temp has to be for the beams to weaken. Not melt. I know if i want to bed a iron bar i have to clamp it in a vice heat a point with a map gas torch, then hit it with a hammer. what temp would the beams have to reach, with the million or so pounds on top of them, to fail. I don't think i have to even reach a 1000 deg f to bend that bar.

    And yes ford cars are grate... for 20 thousand miles. Then they fall apart FAST. In a sense, orph is right. I am repeating the words of my father, but he is a mechanic. He doesn't have any particular dislikes for ford. Is just every time i talk to him he tell me about some new god awful system or component to a car thats a f$$king nightmare to fix. and it never should have broken in the first place. Then i ask (because i don't like ford) "is it a ford" and 85% of the time he'll say yes.
    I can remember one specific example. I walk into the shop one day and he tells me what a piece of crap theses things are, and that he's fixing the timing chain on another one of them. As he troughs his thumb back pointing a ford probe. someone els hear has herd of this, i'm sure.
    I'v had this argument before with people. so i ask him "are ford's really that bad." "It depends" as he looks around. "well i think every car in hear now is a ford". At this point i look around and see fore cars in the shop. The probe, a ford s10 truck and to other cars (fords) i can't remember.
    then he tells me he works mostly on fords.
    Most American cars are crap because they are built to be crap. Their not trying. I i want a good American car, I'll buy a Saleen 7.




    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 8:21pm 2007


    Well, the only thing you said that I concur with is, "Ford is a bitch to work on" The f**king people design their motors to require special tools. Assholes all of them.

    The rest of it is.. unsubstantiated bunk. No car breaks more often than another, not by default anyway.

    Yes, they all break. I drive brand new school busses and about 5 a year break down. I deliver about 75, so thats what? about 4%? Now compound that by ever how many people deliver school busses and you get a pretty whopping figure. s**t breaks.

    I don't own it any longer but I did have a 1990 Tempo. By all accounts a piece of s**t car. At least thats what I heard prior to buying it.. USED.

    I got over 400,000 miles out of it before it became to much of a liability to use anymore. Yup, fixed many of its parts, but it was still about 75% original equipment when I sold it for parts.

    Now, if I bought into that crap about Tempo's, I'd not have gotten one to show me otherwise.

    Believe what you wish, but its people who break these things. If your Pop is fixing mainly Fords, find out if its the owners breaking them before you complain. If your Pop doesn't know, then he should be quiet about Fords too. Could it be that more people drive fords and thats why more are broken?

    I wonder.

    IMO, the most reliable car is a Honda. No particular reason other than they seem to last beyond expectations. I do however like a Saturn too, so its not American or Foreign I favor.

    *shrugs*





    The best things in life, aren't things.



    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by DocRock on Fri Jan 26th at 8:30pm 2007


    The hardest part of the whole 911 thing for me to understand is how people shrug it off like it's not a big deal anymore. To me, it seems that those people are very un-patriotic. How can they shrug it off like - meh, it's been 5 years ago now, get over it.

    It is so obvious that the buildings didn't fall due to fire. I can site you many other buildings that have burned much longer, even days, and didn't collapse. Your agrument, I'm sure, will be that those building weren't hit by planes.

    If a building can burn for hours and hours and not collapse, then what was it that caused the twin towers to collapse only after burning for a few hours? A plane hitting it? Certainly not, especially when the buildings were built to withstand hurricane force winds and a plane hitting it. They had to take that into account when they built the buildings especially when, at the time of their build, they were going to be the tallest in the world. They took into account that the Empire State Building was hit by a plane once which had been lost in the fog. However, the Empire State Building didn't collapse.

    If, for the sake of argument, the buildings' metal stretched and bent due to the heat, wouldn't it make sense to think that the building would have fallen down alot slower than 9 seconds? There was a lot of weight there to collapse upon itself. Wouldn't the floors stack up as they fell, pancaking down upon one another and then slowing as more and more stacked up? But both buildings fell at the speed of gravity. It took 9 seconds for each building to fall. What happened to the floors under to make them not slow the building as it fell? Same thing happened to building WTC7 - but it wasn't even hit by a plane.





    Quote
    Re: A message frrom the great and wise John Cleese
    Posted by Orpheus on Fri Jan 26th at 8:46pm 2007


    The fact remains that we have no structural engineers to postulate our arguments with. Not that that would do any good. We had a doctor, and he royally f**ked up the ADHD discussion. (Thats for the purpose of example, not to open past scabs)

    The buildings were the biggest of the big. Unless you want to wreck a plane into the next tallest building of a DIFFERENT design, we'll never know for sure.

    I watched the films about the falling. I believe it was due to a design flaw that never took into account of fire+impact. If they had, they never would have made the stairwells as they had.

    I have no answer. Just my belief and my engineering background. I could bring a building down. I dunno if I could do it with a plane. I never studied that.

    So, my best guess is worthless. <img src=" SRC="images/smiles/sad.gif">





    The best things in life, aren't things.




    locked