OK here is a new twist to an otherwise already tried and true method. Each of us in the past has seen a map, or many maps that we thought to ourselves, "I would have done it this way" or something similar.
This contest would be open ended, meaning no real time limit. It would be set in such a way that if participant #1 took a week, and #2 took a month, that neither would interfere with the other because the participants aren't competing against one another, only themselves.
The idea is (and I use this as an example for the moment) that Gwil thought he could improve Juims new map. With permission of course, since Juim would have to cough up the map for editing. Gwil sets himself the task of putting his money, where his mouth is.
When Gwil is done, he submits his new version for us to vote on. If he made enough of an improvement, or a sufficient amount of changes to warrant it being "Original" then he would win. (note: changes and improving aren't necessarilly the same thing!) If not, he could continue to alter the map till he succeeds, or settle for what he has created and moves on to his next project.
My question: Do you think this a good idea, and one we need to cultivate?





