omg the worlds gone nutz
Post Reply
Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Cash Car Star on Thu Jan 8th at 6:12am 2004


God Howard Dean... He poses a serious political question: Did the early media coverage make him popular or did his popularity gain him early media coverage? I believe the former. TV Stations and newspapers started crowning him king and boom he's "the frontrunner." He seems so wishy-washy to me, and for all he's attacked Bush on Iraq, he seems to have the least idea of how to get out. Kucinich has a pack-up and hit the road plan while people like Clark and Lieberman have actual strategies for getting out and stuff. (By the way, if you want a slightly more leftist moderate than our current commander in chief, Lieberman is that guy. He's like a Democratic John McCain.) On the domestic front, anybody read about Gephardt's 'Teacher Corps' proposal? That is some legislation I would be down with. Big time.

Dean smiles well though. And dammit, if a good smile isn't what I want in a president, then I don't know what is. Also, I imagine Bill Bradley's support is gonna bring the voters to the polls in droves. Seriously, the best things Dean has going for him are his smiles and the fact that he seems monolithic so some people (not all, just simply 'enough') are declaring his ascension inevitable...

By the way, just as an FYI to unwary Americans, any Englander not named "Tony Blair" loathes George W. Bush. Why is a fire hot? Why is a lake wet? Why is my left ear so sore? There's no good explanation for any of these things; they just are.





Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Cassius on Thu Jan 8th at 6:29am 2004


? posted by Cash Car Star

(By the way, if you want a slightly more leftist moderate than our current commander in chief, Lieberman is that guy. He's like a Democratic John McCain.)

He's also on an undying crusade to burn all videogames. It would of course be bad if suddenly I couldn't play Half-Life at my tender age, but the real problem is what his notions that it's good to ban material he considers 'dangerous' would portend for the rest of his platform.





Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Tracer Bullet on Thu Jan 8th at 8:06am 2004


? posted by Cash Car Star

God Howard Dean... He poses a serious political question: Did the early media coverage make him popular or did his popularity gain him early media coverage? I believe the former. TV Stations and newspapers started crowning him king and boom he's "the frontrunner." He seems so wishy-washy to me, and for all he's attacked Bush on Iraq, he seems to have the least idea of how to get out. Kucinich has a pack-up and hit the road plan while people like Clark and Lieberman have actual strategies for getting out and stuff. (By the way, if you want a slightly more leftist moderate than our current commander in chief, Lieberman is that guy. He's like a Democratic John McCain.) On the domestic front, anybody read about Gephardt's 'Teacher Corps' proposal? That is some legislation I would be down with. Big time.

Dean smiles well though. And dammit, if a good smile isn't what I want in a president, then I don't know what is. Also, I imagine Bill Bradley's support is gonna bring the voters to the polls in droves. Seriously, the best things Dean has going for him are his smiles and the fact that he seems monolithic so some people (not all, just simply 'enough') are declaring his ascension inevitable...

By the way, just as an FYI to unwary Americans, any Englander not named "Tony Blair" loathes George W. Bush. Why is a fire hot? Why is a lake wet? Why is my left ear so sore? There's no good explanation for any of these things; they just are.

I could come up with a good answer to any one of those (except your left ear), but I\'m just being a smart ass.

I totaly agree with most of it.

[addsig]




Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Cash Car Star on Thu Jan 8th at 8:14am 2004


? posted by Cassius
? posted by Cash Car Star

(By the way, if you want a slightly more leftist moderate than our current commander in chief, Lieberman is that guy. He's like a Democratic John McCain.)

He's also on an undying crusade to burn all videogames. It would of course be bad if suddenly I couldn't play Half-Life at my tender age, but the real problem is what his notions that it's good to ban material he considers 'dangerous' would portend for the rest of his platform.

Point. I think that particular agenda of his is pretty nutso.





Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Dr Brasso on Thu Jan 8th at 8:18am 2004


ROFLMAO!!!!.. ..cash, you may now marry my sisters....all of em....ROFLMFAO.....

damn dude, ya took all my best stuff ....couldna spake it better if i was on fire....!!!!

ban HL??? say it aint so cass....!!! you may now marry my oldest daughter...!!!

....there ya go Supercrazy...

Doc Brass...

seriously tho....the guy is a facade of a polititian....doesnt know his ass from a bucket, and still, people flock to him like lemmings...i stand here utterly amazed...

[addsig]




Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Cash Car Star on Thu Jan 8th at 8:38am 2004


I'm hoping these are younger sisters... much younger sisters. I'm not a fan of the Ashton Kutcher lifestyle.



Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Dr Brasso on Thu Jan 8th at 8:43am 2004


...rest assured, they are younger, and much better looking than i... [addsig]



Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by 7dk2h4md720ih on Thu Jan 8th at 1:41pm 2004


? quote:
...rest assured, they are younger, and much better looking than i...


.. so that does that leave your daughters free? *runs
*




Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by SuperCrazy on Thu Jan 8th at 7:28pm 2004


? posted by Cassius
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the term partisan only apply if he were directly supporting a party?

Dictionary.com says it applies to anyone "devoted to or biased in support of a party, group, or cause."

? posted by Cash Car Star

God Howard Dean... He poses a serious political question: Did the early media coverage make him popular or did his popularity gain him early media coverage? I believe the former. TV Stations and newspapers started crowning him king and boom he's "the frontrunner."

Dean has become the frontrunner because of a very large base of activists volunteering for him and donating their money. His use of the Internet as a campaign tool played a huge role in this. He had the momentum that has taken him to where he is now long before the media began calling him the frontrunner.

? posted by Cash Car Star

He seems so wishy-washy to me, and for all he's attacked Bush on Iraq, he seems to have the least idea of how to get out. Kucinich has a pack-up and hit the road plan while people like Clark and Lieberman have actual strategies for getting out and stuff.

Dean's plan for Iraqi reconstruction is on his site. I believe most of his attacks on Bush have been regarding getting us into the situation in the first place though, not on his handling of the reconstruction.

To Kucinich's credit, he also has a fairly detailed "actual strategy" for how to handle the situation. Whether you agree with it or not is another issue (I don't, for one).





Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Dr Brasso on Thu Jan 8th at 7:41pm 2004


? posted by Cassius

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the term partisan only apply if he were directly supporting a party?

? posted by www.snarkpit.com http:>SuperCrazy

Dictionary.com says it applies to anyone "devoted to or biased in support of a party, group, or cause."

then that leaves me out of it, as i will never conform to one party or the other....let alone, "devote to, or bias myself in support of a party, group, or cause."

plain and simply, i have always voted for whom i think is the best qualified candidate...i dont give a flyin s**t if hes dem or rep, black, white, or chinese...and im damn proud of that fact. and you cannot tell me that my statements so far have depicted myself as someone that would "devote to, or bias myself in support of a party, group, or cause."

the only party im interested in is my family... and the country as a whole... i think folks are losing site of the fact that in this "instant gratification based, me me me" society we've developed into, that weve only been involved in this iraq thing for little more than a year this go round, and no matter who is in the oval office, its gonna take time to deal with...dude, ive been in combat that had more loss of life in a week than we've had thru BOTH gulf wars...strategies take time, the world is a better place without sadaam, on both sides of the big pond, so dont even f**kin go there....

Doc Brass...

[addsig]




Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by SuperCrazy on Thu Jan 8th at 7:46pm 2004


That comment was only regarding your "in a liberal state of mind" remark.



Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Dr Brasso on Thu Jan 8th at 7:48pm 2004


ok then...i supose this would be a good place to let it rest sir....agreed?

Doc Brass...

[addsig]




Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by SuperCrazy on Thu Jan 8th at 9:56pm 2004


Probably, I can't see either of us convincing the other person to change their mind.



Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Dr Brasso on Thu Jan 8th at 10:45pm 2004


aye....peace to ya then man..

Doc Brass...





Quote
Re: omg the worlds gone nutz
Posted by Cash Car Star on Fri Jan 9th at 4:30am 2004


? posted by SuperCrazy

Dean has become the frontrunner because of a very large base of activists volunteering for him and donating their money.

I will agree with this, he has shown that he has some deep pockets. The thing is, NO ONE can outdo Bush on the money issue. If he tries to buy himself the Democratic nod, he will surely fail in November. I think Democrats would want a candidate that can stand up to Bush, even on a smaller budget, and I don't believe Dean is where they'll find it.






Post Reply