[map] fy_mini_dust2
Post Reply
Quote
Re: [map] fy_mini_dust2
Posted by nappy on Thu Sep 14th at 7:30pm 2006



This is a a discussion topic for the map "fy_mini_dust2" by nappy which can be found here

Map description:

Hi,

I don't know who build the original cs1.6 map.
My clan members requested i convert it to source.
Layout is as it was in 1.6, i just added some source props and a 3d skybox.

It's a mini map but who ever made it has devised some clever routing. I find it very playable and hope you like it as well.

More info on my site on building etc

Map screenshots:

Screenshots for: fy_mini_dust2




Quote
Re: [map] fy_mini_dust2
Posted by Sparky911 on Thu Sep 14th at 7:30pm 2006


Playing this map alot for Counter-Strike 1.6 I was hoping this map would be as close to the original as possible while still implementing the benifits of the Source engine. I wasn't let down at all. It features the same great fast gameplay and layout as the original. The 3D skybox works well with this map. As the name suggested its a mini version of dust2 shoved into a FY map. For those of you who like to take a break from oridnary CS gameplay or even for those hardcore FY gamers download this map. You won't be disappointed.<br /><br /><b>Verdict</b><br /><br />A must for both the casual and hardcore FY gamer.



Quote
Re: [map] fy_mini_dust2
Posted by Sparky911 on Thu Sep 14th at 7:30pm 2006


Playing this map alot for Counter-Strike 1.6 I was hoping this map would be as close to the original as possible while still implementing the benifits of the Source engine. I wasn't let down at all. It features the same great fast gameplay and layout as the original. The 3D skybox works well with this map. As the name suggested its a mini version of dust2 shoved into a FY map. For those of you who like to take a break from oridnary CS gameplay or even for those hardcore FY gamers download this map. You won't be disappointed.

Design


Gameplay


Verdict
A must for both the casual and hardcore FY gamer.

Pros
Fast gameplayand good layout.

Design
Could have used more Source defining features





Post Reply