Posted by Atrocity on Mon Sep 1st at 8:33pm 2003
Atrocity
member
221 posts
152 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 1st 2003
Location: Toronto Ohio

Occupation: Level Designer/Student
Posted by wacokid on Tue Sep 2nd at 10:07am 2003
rotate that truck about 45 degrees.

Posted by Finger on Tue Sep 2nd at 1:36pm 2003
I have some issues with your debris.

area 1. - It looks like the room was full of concrete, and someone knocked the wall off. If this is supposed to be debris from, say, the roof caving in, that huge concrete brush isn't very convincing. Try making a couple of fallen rafters, and some smaller chunks of debris on the floor of the room, instead of one solid block.
area 2. - This looks funny for a couple of reasons. If that is supposed to be the wall that fell from the building above it, it looks way too thick, and the way it's skewed isn't doint it any justice. The texturing is also throwing me off there. That concrete texture just doesn't make any sense on the side of that brush. I would break it (not literally) into maybe 3 medium size brushes, texture it completely with the brick texture, and make them about 16 units thick.
Other than those obvious oddities, the screenies looked really nice.![]()
Posted by Finger on Tue Sep 2nd at 4:45pm 2003
I was bored, so I did a paintover to Illustrate what I was talking about with the debris.

Posted by Atrocity on Tue Sep 2nd at 5:32pm 2003
Atrocity
member
221 posts
152 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 1st 2003
Location: Toronto Ohio

Occupation: Level Designer/Student
Posted by Finger on Tue Sep 2nd at 7:26pm 2003

Posted by Orpheus on Tue Sep 2nd at 7:30pm 2003
| ? posted by Finger |
teehee.. I'll do makeover's for anyone else, if they like.![]() |
apparently, you ain't seen my ugly puss yet.. ask gollum.. it would take skills far beyond anyone at SP ![]()
Orpheus
member
13860 posts
1547 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 26th 2001
Location: Long Oklahoma - USA

Occupation: Long Haul Trucking
Posted by Atrocity on Wed Sep 3rd at 3:23am 2003
Atrocity
member
221 posts
152 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 1st 2003
Location: Toronto Ohio

Occupation: Level Designer/Student
Posted by Finger on Wed Sep 3rd at 12:24pm 2003
Posted by Quasar on Wed Sep 3rd at 3:52pm 2003
ATROCITY!!!!!!111!!!11!!OENOEN!!11!!!
How ya been? Great maps btw ![]()
Quasar
member
10 posts
1 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 1st 2003
Location: UK

Occupation: Not a lot, really.
Posted by Myrk- on Thu Sep 4th at 2:44am 2003
Gotta love the way people think:
HL2!?! OMGAWD NO POLY LIMIT!
There most certainly is, HL2 is only HL1 with stuff chunked on top, model lods, distance brush loading with fog and skillfull brushwork make the levels in HL2 look good.
[addsig]Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by Atrocity on Fri Sep 5th at 4:11am 2003
Atrocity
member
221 posts
152 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 1st 2003
Location: Toronto Ohio

Occupation: Level Designer/Student
Posted by wckd on Thu Sep 11th at 9:06pm 2003
Posted by KungFuSquirrel on Thu Sep 11th at 9:13pm 2003
| ? quote: |
|
?HL2!?! OMGAWD NO POLY LIMIT! |
Technically, there isn't.
KungFuSquirrel
member
751 posts
345 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Austin TX

Occupation: Game Design, LightBox Interactive
Posted by ReNo on Thu Sep 11th at 9:29pm 2003
Oh you are pedantic aren't you andrew ![]()
But you are correct, it was certainly stated by some valve folks that the r_speeds facility has been scrapped in favour of a more in-depth performance related scale. I'd say this is a good way of doing things, as lately I've found r_speeds to be a pretty unclear indicator. Take my level Seneca for example - w_poly hits 1600+ and yet I witnessed far less slowdown than I've had on maps with lower counts.
[addsig]ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Posted by Sinner_D on Fri Sep 12th at 1:31am 2003
i know lep could use a makeover...MUAHAHA ![]()
*runs and hides*
[addsig]Sinner_D
member
376 posts
78 snarkmarks
Registered: Oct 11th 2002
Location: Sandiego, CA

Occupation: Freelance mapper
Posted by Myrk- on Fri Sep 12th at 2:03am 2003
Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by fraggard on Fri Sep 12th at 2:31am 2003
fraggard
member
1110 posts
201 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 8th 2002
Location: Bangalore, India

Occupation: Student
Posted by ReNo on Fri Sep 12th at 11:04am 2003
"R_speeds" are just essentially various counts of the number of polygons on screen (and the time taken to render them), so technically they will always exist. The r_speeds command however, seems to have been dropped, in favour of a performance indicator that people have compared to the current netgraph tool, as Fraggard said. It will still take into account the number of polygons on screen, but thats not the sole indicator as in HL1.
[addsig]ReNo
member
5457 posts
933 snarkmarks
Registered: Aug 22nd 2001
Location: Scotland
Occupation: Level Designer
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.0148 seconds.

