Posted by m@t on Tue Dec 23rd at 5:01am 2003
Notice: This method only works if your CPU supports MMX.
Add these to your userconfig.cfg (or make your own):
developer 1 // puts you in developer mode
r_mmx 1 // forces MMX calculations
fps_max 500 // you can set this to just about anything
cl_showfps 1 // shows approx. fps in top left of screen
Enjoy!
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Tue Dec 23rd at 7:32am 2003
Yak_Fighter
member
1832 posts
406 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 30th 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Posted by m@t on Tue Dec 23rd at 5:45pm 2003
Posted by Yak_Fighter on Tue Dec 23rd at 11:02pm 2003
Yak_Fighter
member
1832 posts
406 snarkmarks
Registered: Dec 30th 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Occupation: College Student/Slacker
Posted by Myrk- on Wed Dec 24th at 2:41am 2003
I find lower screen refresh rate is softer on the eyes, must be the intake of electrons or photons or somat. I get sorer eyes with 80fps than 60, plus some games like diablo 2 and HL look smoother at lower framerates.
Its the reason why console versions of games look better- take Halo for instance, looks 10x smoother and softer 'cus the TV screen has less pixel density and slower fps
[addsig]Myrk-
member
2299 posts
385 snarkmarks
Registered: Feb 12th 2002
Location: Plymouth, UK

Occupation: CAD & Graphics Technician
Posted by Gorbachev on Wed Dec 24th at 8:07am 2003
| ? posted by Myrk- |
|
I find lower screen refresh rate is softer on the eyes, must be the intake of electrons or photons or somat. I get sorer eyes with 80fps than 60, plus some games like diablo 2 and HL look smoother at lower framerates. Its the reason why console versions of games look better- take Halo for instance, looks 10x smoother and softer 'cus the TV screen has less pixel density and slower fps |
If you're actually getting higher framerates it'll always be smoother...My friend gets 24 in D2 and it plays and looks like shyte...I get around 50-60 and it's smooth. The TV is solely because of the blur. All the FPS console games with higher refresh rates run smoother. Lower frame-rates = chop = not smooth. And running a computer monitor at 60 Hz is not exactly advisable when you have flourescent lights I believe it is because the lights and the monitor conflict with refresh rates causing your eyes to get "tired" and can cause headaches. Always run your monitor at the highest possible refresh rate. I ignored this for the longest time but realize how much longer I can go with a better refresh. Use vsync or at least set your fps_max to whatever refresh rate you're using on your computer for the best possible image.
[addsig]Posted by Tracer Bullet on Wed Dec 24th at 9:09am 2003
| ? posted by Myrk- |
|
I find lower screen refresh rate is softer on the eyes, must be the intake of electrons or photons or somat. I get sorer eyes with 80fps than 60, plus some games like diablo 2 and HL look smoother at lower framerates. Its the reason why console versions of games look better- take Halo for instance, looks 10x smoother and softer 'cus the TV screen has less pixel density and slower fps |
Part a. just silly
part b. If you think fuzzy images look good, than go ahead and stick to console games. I personly think they look like s**t.
and gorb, flourescent lights run at 120hz even though they run on 60hz current. go figure.
[addsig]Tracer Bullet
member
2271 posts
367 snarkmarks
Registered: May 22nd 2003
Location: Seattle WA, USA

Occupation: Graduate Student (Ph.D)
Posted by Hornpipe2 on Wed Dec 24th at 7:21pm 2003
| ? posted by Tracer Bullet | ||
Part a. just silly part b. If you think fuzzy images look good, than go ahead and stick to console games. I personly think they look like s**t. and gorb, flourescent lights run at 120hz even though they run on 60hz current. go figure. |
Sounds like somebody needs S-Video or Component video cables.
Assuming you live in a country that uses those, that is.
[addsig]Hornpipe2
member
636 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 7th 2003
Location: Conway, AR, USA

Occupation: Programmer
Posted by Forceflow on Wed Dec 24th at 7:56pm 2003
Forceflow
member
2420 posts
342 snarkmarks
Registered: Nov 6th 2003
Location: Belgium

Occupation: Engineering Student (CS)
Posted by fraggard on Thu Dec 25th at 2:02am 2003
| ? posted by Tracer Bullet |
|
flourescent lights run at 120hz even though they run on 60hz current. go figure. |
They fire once in the Positive half of the Input cycle, and once in the Negative half... Hence twice the frequency 
fraggard
member
1110 posts
201 snarkmarks
Registered: Jul 8th 2002
Location: Bangalore, India

Occupation: Student
Posted by Edge Damodred on Thu Dec 25th at 2:55am 2003
Edge Damodred
member
237 posts
54 snarkmarks
Registered: Apr 24th 2002
Location: I don't even know anymore

Occupation: student
Posted by m@t on Thu Dec 25th at 5:52am 2003
Posted by Hornpipe2 on Tue Jan 6th at 6:53am 2004
Sorry to resurrect this, but here's a program I wrote to demonstrate that you can, in fact, tell the difference.
http://www.snarkpit.com/pits/hornpipe2/FPS.zip
Enjoy.
[addsig]Hornpipe2
member
636 posts
94 snarkmarks
Registered: Sep 7th 2003
Location: Conway, AR, USA

Occupation: Programmer
Snarkpit v6.1.0 created this page in 0.1924 seconds.


