Does it have to be 2? I'm quite certain I use 1, although typing it has become second nature so I don't actually know for sure.

As a sidethought on having trouble following pointfiles, do you think it would be a good idea to perhaps reduce the max rendered distance of the map if you know there is a leak? Often when I have leaks they are on large and complex maps, so when out in the void the whole map is rendered, making it run extremely slowly, and meaning there are loads of points criss-crossing around, making the tracing process tricky. If you cut down the max rendered distance then it would run nice and smooth, and (I don't know if this would be true) perhaps only the points within your vision range would be drawn.

Obviously this would only be useful on complex maps where you are having real trouble following the pointfile, as its a bit of hassle going and changing the settings and recompiling, but its just a little thought.

? posted by Campaignjunkie

Not really a problem for me. I just load the pointfile in VHE 3.5 - it's a bit buggy, but still quite functional. Saves a lot of time when I'm fixing, say, 15 leaks.

i have a tough time imagining only 1, how does one create multiple leaks?

i must be a freak, i create at most 1 per map.. :/

Duncan, it doesn't take an Einstein to see that my style of mapping is all straight lines, i would imagine that 90* angles are less hole inviting than your famous rock works.

i just love to look in hammer and see all straight angles , clean brushwork is very cool IMO.

? posted by ReNo

Wow, you are one lucky devil then Orph, I almost always have at least one per compile. Most of them come from workwork though I guess, which is all I've done for quite some time

I tell ya, that workwork...

coulda been worse duncan, you coulda hit the "P" and made it porkwork... something i would rather not have to envision