Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 8:45pm
/me gets indignant, cause you all are deliberately playing dumb 
go back, re-read Hugh's reply.. and forget reno replied at all and it will make perfect sense 
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 8:25pm
*sighs*
it wasn't a joke, read hughs RANT.. i was laughing at him 
Posted by Campaignjunkie on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 8:03pm
Orph apparently explained that WAD's can be bypassed right before you. I'm not sure if that's hilarious enough though.
[addsig]
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 8:02pm
this once, it wasn't a joke, i was laughing at Hugh's comment about no one critiquing his map because of a missing wad..
all i meant was, you can circumvent a missing wad, but you cannot a model (to my knowledge)
anywho's, as i said, you were thinking correctly, but reading my words wrong..
tis no biggie
Posted by ReNo on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 7:29pm
/me looks up as Orph's joke goes right over his head...
Sorry mate, I've re-read it numerous times now and I still haven't a clue what the joke is
Posted by beer hunter on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 5:16pm
| ? quote: |
Thanks for pointing it out, I award you a gold... award. |
hey ! i've won something
/edit - it doesn't seem to be using any textures from hugh_issues.wad ? ...lol
Some nice curved wall action going on in the room with the 4 rooflights. I would retexture the railings tho' with something more detailed that looks nicer.
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 2:10pm
| ? posted by ReNo |
|
I'm confused, how couldn't you just bypass a model the same way as a wad, by renaming another model to replace the missing one? Anyway, I'll try and take a look later on today |
slow down duncan, read it again..
you are thinking it right, but reading it wrong
Posted by ReNo on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 1:26pm
I'm confused, how couldn't you just bypass a model the same way as a wad, by renaming another model to replace the missing one?
Anyway, I'll try and take a look later on today
Posted by Orpheus on Wed Jun 23rd 2004 at 11:16am
missing wads, can be bypassed.. its not as if it were a model missing 
(<--which cannot)
[edit] message editted for duncan[/edit]
[addsig]